Why don’t fats make a person fat? A Dietitian explains how it might be the opposite

Professionals have some excellent news to fairly share: no, eating fats does not automatically make you fat. Overeating, macronutrient (fat, protein, or carbs) boosts the threat of weight gain, said registered dietitian Kristin Kirkpatrick at Cleveland Clinic Wellness, but “fat in and of itself just is not a thing that is likely to make you fat,” despite the somewhat misleadingly identical terminology.

You can understand where in actuality the misconception arises from, however. “Fat can be a fairly scary nutrient” for individuals who count calories, Kristin said, since it is more calorie-dense: one gram of fat contains nine calories, in comparison to four calories per gram of protein and four calories per gram of carbohydrate. “People also may associate fat with more ‘indulgent’ foods, such as butter and steak,” Kristin told POPSUGAR, adding to the misconception that every fat are unhealthy. Then there is the simple association that eating fats might create fat within the body, which is not just the situation; you are likely to gain weight if you eat processed or processed foods or overeat consistently, including fats, but fats do not inherently lead to weight gain.

Kristin said, nearly all her clients have now been able to lose weight on high-fat diets, often since they replace refined carbs and sugars with healthy fats (snacking on nuts as opposed to pretzels, for example). The popular ketogenic diet, which can be high-fat and low-carb, is the one which has helped many people drop some weight, even though it is still controversial among dietitians.

According to Kristin, fats will also be harder to digest than other nutrients, such as carbs. This means they take longer to move throughout your digestive system, that will help you stay full for longer and have fewer snacking cravings. Fats improve your metabolism for the same reason; the body needs more energy (aka burns more calories) to digest them.

Exactly how much fat should you eat, then? On average, seek to keep fats as 30 percent of one’s healthy daily diet, though Kristin noted that this would probably vary based on the body, activity level, and general health; consult a health care provider or dietitian for guidelines specific to the body. You ought to also adhere to healthy fats as much as possible, including avocados, nuts, whole soy, olive oil, and fatty fish like tuna and salmon.

So no, you most likely do not need to go nonfat to get rid of weight or remain healthy. Keeping those healthy fat sources as part of your regular diet, balanced with carbs and much protein, is the better way to go.

Reference
Does Eating Fat Make You Fat? | POPSUGAR Fitness. https://www.popsugar.com/fitness/Does-Eating-Fat-Make-You-Fat-46237336

New study links people who don’t get enough sleep to poor nutrition

Study links people who don’t get enough sleep to poor nutrition

Poor sleep has been connected to poor nutrition. However, it is unclear why the two may appear together. The association between the issues was revealed in a study that looked at National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, based on the American Society for Nutrition, which unearthed that individuals who sleep lower than seven hours per night might also lack adequate levels of vital nutrients.

Following the CDC, adults should get more than seven hours of sleep per night to maintain their health. The brand new study unearthed that US adults who got not as much as that number also, an average of, consumed fewer nutrients like vitamins D and A, zinc, niacin, and more.

Some vitamins and minerals are vital for health but are not created by the body. Someone with a poor diet could be with a lack of at least one of these micronutrients, eventually leading to disruption in normal bodily functions, or perhaps the introduction of diseases or any other problems.

As well as a connection between poor sleep and poor nutrition, the study found that more nutrients were connected to poor sleep in females; taking vitamin supplements reduced the amount, based on the study, hinting at a potential benefit from supplementing to fill the nutritional gaps in one’s diet.

The findings may be revealed because of the study’s lead author Chioma Ikonte in the annual American Society for Nutrition meeting. The type for the study means the researchers were not able to find out whether someone suffers poor sleep quality because of poor nutrition, or if perhaps poor sleep quality eventually results in nutritional deficits.

Reference

Study links people who don’t get enough sleep to poor …. https://www.slashgear.com/study-links-people-who-dont-get-enough-sleep-to-poor-nutrition-09579778/

It is interesting that body fat distribution linked to higher risk of aggressive prostate cancer

Micrograph showing prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma (the most common form of prostate cancer) Credit: Wikipedia

In the first prospective study of directly measured body fat distribution and prostate cancer risk, investigators unearthed that higher levels of abdominal and thigh fat are associated with an increased danger of aggressive prostate cancer. Published early online in a peer-reviewed journal associated with the American Cancer Society, the findings can result in a significantly better knowledge of the partnership between obesity and prostate cancer and supply new insights for treatment.

Previous research reports have shown that obesity is related to a heightened chance of advanced prostate cancer and a poorer prognosis after diagnosis. Also, emerging evidence shows that the precise distribution of fat in the torso may be an essential factor.

To offer high-quality evidence, Barbra Dickerman, Ph.D., associated with the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, along with her colleagues analyzed body fat distribution using the gold-standard way of measuring computed tomography imaging and assessed the possibility of being identified as having, and dying from, prostate cancer among 1,832 Icelandic men who were followed for up to 13 years.

Throughout the study, 172 men developed prostate cancer, and 31 died from the disease. The accumulation of fat in specific areas—such as visceral fat (deep in the abdomen, surrounding the organs) and thigh subcutaneous fat (just under the skin)—was associated aided by the threat of advanced and fatal prostate cancer. High body mass index (BMI) and high waist circumference were also connected with higher risks of advanced and fatal prostate cancer.

Interestingly, when looking separately at men with a high BMI versus low BMI, we discovered that the association between visceral fat and advanced and fatal prostate cancer was stronger among men with a lower BMI. The precision of these estimates was limited in this subgroup analysis, but this might be an intriguing signal for future research.

Additional studies are needed to investigate the role of fat distribution when looking at the development and progression of prostate cancer and exactly how alterations in fat stores as time passes may affect patients’ health. Ultimately, identifying the patterns of fat distribution, which are from the highest risk of clinically significant prostate cancer might help to elucidate the mechanisms linking obesity with aggressive disease and target men for intervention strategies.

An accompanying editorial notes that lifestyle interventions—such as diet and exercise—that target fat loss may also reduce the risk of prostate cancer.

Reference
Body fat distribution linked to higher risk of aggressive …. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-06-body-fat-linked-higher-aggressive.html

Can Fat Thighs Give You Cancer? Study Finds Link Certain …. https://uevf.org/cancer/fat-thighs-give-cancer-study-finds-link-kinds-obesity-aggressive-prostate-cancer-68666028

It is interesting that Vitamin D supplement does not prevent type 2 diabetes in adults at high risk, study finds

Taking a daily vitamin D supplement will not prevent type 2 diabetes in adults at high risk, according to results from research funded by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), an element of the National Institutes of Health. The Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) study enrolled 2,423 adults and was conducted at 22 sites throughout the united states of America. These findings were published June 7 into the New England Journal of Medicine and presented during the 79th Scientific Sessions regarding the American Diabetes Association in San Francisco bay area.

2d may be the most extensive study to directly examine if daily vitamin D supplementation assists in maintaining people at high risk for type 2 diabetes from developing the illness. The analysis included adults aged 30 or older and assigned participants randomly to either take 4,000 International Units (IU) for the D3 (cholecalciferol) kind of vitamin D or a placebo pill daily. All study participants had their vitamin D levels measured at the beginning of the study. During those times, about 80% of participants had vitamin D levels considered sufficient by U.S. nutritional standards.

“Observational studies have reported an association between lower levels of vitamin D and increased risk for type 2 diabetes,” said Myrlene Staten, M.D., D2d project scientist at NIDDK. “Additionally, smaller studies discovered that vitamin D could improve the function of beta cells, which produce insulin. However, whether vitamin D supplementation might help prevent or delay type 2, diabetes had not been known.”

The analysis screened participants every three to half a year for an average of 2.5 years to ascertain if diabetes had developed. Researchers then compared how many people in all the two study groups which had progressed to type 2 diabetes. At the end of the analysis, 293 away from 1211 participants (24.2%) in the vitamin D group developed diabetes in comparison to 323 out of 1212 (26.7%) into the placebo group – a difference that failed to reach statistical significance. The study was made to detect a risk decrease by 25% or even more.

D2d enrolled a different number of participants with a variety of physical characteristics, including sex, age, and body mass index, as well as racial and ethnic diversity. This representation helps ensure that the analysis findings could be widely applicable to people at high risk for developing type 2 diabetes.

As well as the study’s size, certainly one of its major strengths could be the diversity of their participants, which enabled us to examine the effect of vitamin D across a sizable number of people. When the study ended, we found no meaningful difference between the two groups, no matter age, sex, race, or ethnicity.

Reference
NIH-funded trial finds vitamin D does not prevent type 2 …. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-funded-trial-finds-vitamin-d-does-not-prevent-type-2-diabetes-people-high-risk

Do you know in milestone trial, experimental drug delays type 1 diabetes?

Marking the culmination of a 33-year odyssey, scientists today report a milestone in type 1 diabetes: the first occasion the illness happens to be markedly delayed in young adults at high risk. Presenting in the American Diabetes Association meeting in San Francisco and publishing simultaneously when looking at the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers found that two weeks of an experimental intravenous drug held off disease by on average about e of years.

The mainstay of type 1 diabetes treatment is insulin, discovered 97 years ago. These results open an innovative new chapter, says Jeffrey Bluestone, an immunologist at the University of California, San Francisco bay area, and the first research team. “On the only hand,” the outcome is “pretty exciting,” Bluestone says. “On one other hand, now the actual time and effort begin.” Which will mean considering just how to move this treatment forward and probing whom it is most very likely to help?

The clinical trial began eight years back and included 76 people, the youngest of whom were 8 yrs. old plus the oldest within their 40s. Nearly three-quarters were 18 and under. Each had an incredibly high danger of type 1 diabetes. In this autoimmune disease, the body attacks cells within the pancreas, which make insulin, which helps keep blood glucose levels under control. Because of the time diabetes is diagnosed, a lot of these insulin-producing cells, called beta cells, have left.

Reference
In milestone trial, experimental drug delays type 1 …. https://ehealthynews.com/2019/06/10/in-milestone-trial-experimental-drug-delays-type-1-diabetes-science-magazine/

It is amazing that scientists dream of a personalized diet based on Genetics

No single food regimen works well with everyone. New research is one of comprehensive effort yet to understand why.

CreditGetty Images

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

A decade ago, spurred by the success of the Human Genome Project and the affordability of genetic sequencing, scientists started to explore the promise of “nutrigenomics.” Could personalized nutrition, informed by understanding of an individual’s DNA, assist in preventing and even
treat diet-related diseases?

The outcome of early studies from Harvard, Stanford and elsewhere were compelling: Genetic differences did actually predispose individuals to lose different levels of weight on different sorts of diets. A multimillion-dollar industry soon sprang up, premised on marketing DNA-based diets. But subsequent studies have failed to demonstrate any statistically significant difference between fat reduction between overweight individuals who “eat suitable for their genotype” and the ones that do not.

In fact, the result of genes on obesity has been hard to tease out; various studies put the figure at anywhere from 35 to 85 percent. Nutritionists have traditionally observed that no body weight-loss strategy works well with everyone, and that individuals show striking differences in their responses to different diets.

Reference
Diet for One? Scientists Stalk the Dream of Personalized …. https://monohealthy.com/diet-for-one-scientists-stalk-the-dream-of-personalized-nutrition-the-new-york-times/

Is there a benefit to forgiving someone who done you wrong?

Harboring anger and hostility were related to a higher risk of cardiovascular system disease in a paper published within the Journal of the American College of Cardiology in 2009.

The paper, which involved reviewing 44 previously published studies on cardiovascular illnesses, found that anger and hostility were related to increased cardiovascular system disease events, such for example coronary arrest, in healthy people and poor prognosis in people who already had a brief history of heart disease.

“To better understand the entire process of forgiveness, it may be useful to step back and appear at the procedure for waiting on hold to anger,” said Neda Gould, a clinical psychologist and assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore.

“Anger is a form of stress, and thus, whenever we hang on to anger, it is as if we are turning in the body’s stress response, or fight or flight response, chronically. We know that turning about this response chronically contributes to wear and tear on the body,” she said. “It might not be surprising that after we participate in the act of forgiveness, we could commence to switch off the strain response while the physiological changes that accompany it.”

Even yet in people with high lifetime stress, those types of who scores on top of measures of forgiveness — in which they report engaging in acts of forgiveness — their high-stress lives tend not to predict poor psychological state, based on a study published when you look at the Journal of Health Psychology in 2016.

This means forgiveness may provide some protective factors against lifetime stress, even though researchers have traditionally known that lifetime stress is tied to worse psychological state outcomes.

Another study, published into the Annals of Behavioral Medicine in 2016, unearthed that with time, increases in forgiveness are associated with decreases in stress.

The study involved using questionnaires to measure degrees of forgiveness and perceived stress among 332 adults, age 16 to 79. The adults were followed for five weeks, and levels of forgiveness were measured by asking perhaps the adults agreed or disagreed with statements such for example “I wish for good things to occur to the person who wronged me.”

The analysis unearthed that quantities of forgiveness tended to change as time passes, however in general, “increases in forgiveness were associated with reductions in perceived stress, that have been in turn about decreases in mental yet not physical health symptoms,” the researchers wrote when you look at the study.

“Given how complex we have been as human beings with regards to our biology and our experiences, it is hard to generalize why some people are more likely to forgive than others. However, forgiveness is an art that can be cultivated,” Gould said.

Reference

Forgiveness and your health: What science says about the …. https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/05/health/forgiveness-health-explainer/index.html

Do you know what the colors in the rainbow flag stands for?

The rainbow flag that has turned out to be a worldwide icon of hope for LGBTQ individuals around the world, first flew in San Francisco bay area’s United Nations Plaza for Gay Pride Day, on June 25, 1978.

It had eight colors — two more than today’s version — and was created by Gilbert Baker, an openly gay artist, and activist. He has previously been accredited to develop an icon for the LGBTQ people by his associate Harvey Milk, the initial openly gay chosen official in California.

Baker drew motivation from the US national flag, which had commemorated its bicentennial in 1976, and a real rainbow, which showcases the colors of the light spectrum in approximately precisely the same sequence since the flag. He assigned a meaning to every one of this colors: hot pink for sex, red for life, orange for healing, yellow for sunlight, green for nature, turquoise for magic, blue for harmony and violet for spirit.

The first flag measured 30 by 60 feet and Baker, who was then 27 yrs. old, had sewn it by hand.

Reference
Pride flag: A history of the Gilbert Baker rainbow design …. https://www.cnn.com/style/article/pride-rainbow-flag-design-history/index.html

Chicken vs. Red Meat

A new study mentioned that the prevalent belief that white meat, such as chicken, is healthier for cholesterol levels compared to red meat, such as beef, pork, or lamb.

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

A new study suggests that eating poultry is just as bad for our cholesterol levels as eating red meat.

A new review breaks some bad update for meat eaters, as scholars discover that white meat is at this moment as detrimental to cholesterol as red meat.

The paper counters the extensive belief that white meat is further beneficial than red. This belief depends on a range of observational findings that have discovered a connection concerning red meat intake and a advanced danger of cardiovascular disease.

Reference

When it comes to cholesterol, is chicken as bad as red meat?. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/when-it-comes-cholesterol-chicken-bad-red-meat-n1013376

Blood pressure drugs may help reduce dementia risk

A massive innovative analysis has discovered a connection concerning choosing many classes of blood pressure-lowering medications and a minor risk of dementia amongst senior adults, adding to the conversation about the relationship concerning cognitive deterioration and high blood pressure.

People who take blood pressure-lowering medication may have a lower risk of dementia.

Dementia is an umbrella term for numerous neurodegenerative disorders, the most extensive of which is Alzheimer’s disease.

The critical trait of dementia is progressive cognitive deterioration, in which a person encounters memory loss and degeneration in their reasoning and decision-making capabilities.

Scientists are still ambiguous as to what causes dementia, but in an attempt to progress prevention stratagems, they have been examining the possible danger causes that may be a factor to the progress of this condition.

Various current studies have connected hypertension with an advanced risk of dementia. For example, a paper that appeared in the journal Neurology last year found that hypertension is coupled to a higher risk of suffering brain lesions, which are, in turn, attached to dementia.

Reference

May | 2019 | My CMS | Page 40. https://www.medicationjunction.com/2019/05/page/40/