In December 2019, at the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Vanuatu’s representative to the European Union made a political proposal: to make environmental degradation a crime.
Vanuatu is a tiny island country in the South Pacific, a nation endangered by increasing sea levels. Global warming is an immediate and catastrophic problem in the region, and activities that triggered rising temperatures – such as the combustion of fossil fuels – has almost totally taken place abroad to satisfy other nations, with the blessing of state governments.
Small island states like Vanuatu have long sought to convince big, strong nations to voluntarily curb their pollution, but progress has been sluggish – Ambassador John Licht indicated that it might be time to change the legislation itself.
An enhancement to the Treaty, also known as the Rome Statute, developed by the International Criminal Court could criminalize ecocide-related actions, he said, adding that “this radical concept deserves serious debate.” Reference Ecocide: Should killing nature be a crime? – BBC Future. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20201105-what-is-ecocide
Pope Francis’ call for legal acceptance of #same-sex relationships has raised both hope and worries among #LGBTQ Catholics.
“What we need certainly to create is a civil union law,” the pontiff said in “Francesco,” an upcoming documentary from Russian American filmmaker Evgeny Afineevsky. “That way, these are typically legally covered. I stood up for that.”
The remarks are a departure from earlier church messaging. Inside the last book, “Memory and Identity,” Pope John Paul II suggested same-sex marriage was “part of an innovative new ideology of evil.”
In 2003, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who later became Pope Benedict XVI, wrote that respect for gays and lesbians “cannot lead in any solution to the approval of homosexual behavior or even to legal recognition of homosexual unions.”
“Legal recognition of homosexual unions or placing them on a single level as marriage will mean not only the approval of deviant behavior,” Ratzinger wrote, “but would also obscure basic values which fit in with the normal inheritance of humanity.” It has not been long ago that African Americans and Whites could intermarry. At that time, some Whites believed that Blacks would destroy the white race. Now, we see that the Pope is making a bold statement. Why are some people concerned about others’ marriage when their marriage ends in divorce because of an unfaithful partner who may be practicing deviant behavior with an individual of a different gender or that same-gender, which leads to adultery? Why get in other people’s business if your business is not perfect? Who gives a person the right to tell others who to love when your Christian bible say, “save yourself”? What would G-d say about one’s prejudice toward a sister or brother who may not share the same beliefs? Are we better than the other person because we know scriptures and many times misquote them without knowing the historial context that time in which scripture was written? If we take the scriptures literally, should we be stoning people?There are gay people in our families, pulpits, professional life who are doctors, lawyers, teachers, nurses, firefighter, ministers, essential workers, and in the church serving in every ministry whether known or unkown. There are just questions to think about.
The judicial system sentence more African Americans for non-offensive crimes while whites have committed the worst crimes. African Americans are more likely to spend more time in jail than whites. The judicial system in American is rigged to punish Africans more than whites. African Americans pay more fines than whites. African Americans pay higher fines than whites.
“A 63-year-old man who was serving a life sentence in prison for stealing a pair of hedge clippers has been granted parole, CBS affiliate KLFY reported. The Louisiana Board of Pardons and Committee on Parole voted this week to release Fair Wayne Bryant after he had served 23 years in prison.” This person should take the system to court for unjust sentencing. Do you think the crime is ridiculous and does not warrant 23 years in jail?
About 2 million Americans could die in the time and effort to accomplish herd immunity to the coronavirus.
Experts had “huge issues” regarding a herd immunity strategy, and much continues to be unknown about how long immunity to Covid-19 may last. Suppose we are waiting until 60% to 80% of individuals own it. We are discussing 200 million-plus Americans getting this — with a fatality price of 1%, suppose, that is 2 million Americans will die with this effort to get herd immunity. Those are usually preventable deaths.
What is herd immunity, and why some think it might finish the coronavirus pandemic? Throughout a media briefing in Geneva the other day, that “herd immunity” is generally discussed in vaccinations — much less a response to some pandemic. Whenever we talk about herd immunity, we discuss just how much of the populace must be vaccinated to possess immunity to the herpes virus towards the pathogen so that transmission cannot happen or is very problematic for a virus or perhaps a pathogen to transmit among people.
If we consider herd immunity within the organic sense of letting a virus run, it is dangerous. The virus infects many people, lots of people will require hospitalizations, and several people will pass away.
The economic after-effects from the coronavirus pandemic guarantees to affect families throughout the United States and future decades for years to come. The downturn will probably hit African Americans hardest, exacerbating huge, long-standing racial wealth spaces. Because these inequities possess historical roots, looking at how they contribute to intergenerational inequality will help citizens, policymakers, and stakeholders create policies that move the country toward racial collateral. We cannot start 20, 50, or even a century ago; we need to start. Four hundred years ago, white people trafficked and enslaved African people to build their particular wealth.
Centuries of systemic and structural racism followed, and it was not really until 1865 that the 13th Amendment passed and officially released Black people from bondage. For almost 100 years, Jim Crow laws and regulations and discriminatory practices forced racial segregation and impaired efforts to reduce or eliminate the racial wealth gap.
Limited covenants and redlining avoided Black people from buying homes in many neighborhoods; the Black Codes prohibited many Black people from creating profitable businesses, and white mob violence destroyed the firms of many other Black business owners and being denied entry to better-paying jobs got more difficult for Black family members to accrue savings to get down payments on homes or accumulate cash about business investments.
America’s dominant cultural lens and narrative center on white persons and portray the country’s past primarily as a tale of social innovation and progress.
Within this narrative, contemporary problems like poverty and crime are individual and communal failings. By extension, racial disparities shows poor options or behavioral patterns, not historical and continued discrimination.
This narrative minimizes or removes the impact of human trafficking and bondage and the following terrorizing and humiliation of Black people through assault, the Black Codes, and Jim Crow. This implicitly perpetuates the belief that white people are doing better as they are inherently better or are operating harder, laying the bedrock for white supremacy.
House investigators issued subpoenas Thursday up to 2 associates of President Trump’s lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani following their arrest on campaign finance charges, seeking “key documents” which have not been produced along with impeachment inquiry.
The 2 guys are supposed to charge with scheming to funnel foreign money to U.S. politicians within a bid to affect U.S.-Ukraine relations. Both types have helped Giuliani investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his awesome son, although the indictment does not mention Giuliani or suggest that he cannot be charged with illegal trespass portion of alleged crimes. The developments played out as Trump ready to move to Minneapolis as a result of his first campaign rally since House Democrats launched the impeachment inquiry. Ahead of the trip, Trump lashed out at Fox News following its release of a new poll showing 51 percent of voters want to see him impeached and taken out of office. That is an uptick considering that the House launched an inquiry focused on Trump’s call wherein he pressed the president of Ukraine to look into the Bidens at a time when U.S. military aid to Ukraine was withheld.
If there is something we understand about President Donald Trump, it is that he is an unapologetic egomaniac that is obsessed with general public viewpoint. He retweets good approval reviews while labeling any polls showing negative ratings as “fake.” Throughout decades in public areas life, Trump has repeatedly lied about his wide range. The entirety of their life is choreographed appearing vibrant, and powerful. Trump’s narcissism, nonetheless, reveals a fragility that congressional Democrats is smart to exploit as they continue steadily to debate whether they should initiate impeachment procedures resistant to the president.
For this point, Democrats have now been trapped in a field of their very own generating. Regarding the one hand, they issue strong statements claiming that the president “is perhaps not over the law.” In the other, Democratic leaders like House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., state that “you cannot impeach a president if American people do not help it.”
By wanting to contain it both methods, congressional leaders only have telegraphed to Trump that they do not have the stomach for the impeachment fight. Trump indeed interprets their hesitancy as weakness and feels empowered because of it.
Fox News on Friday afternoon standing by Laura Ingraham after this lady defended a white supremacist plus many other fringe individuals who have been prohibited or disciplined by huge social news agencies.
Ingraham’s defense regarding the extremists on her prime time Fox showcase “The Ingraham Angle” came during the course of a segment on Thursday regarding House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s negative feedback of facebook or twitter for not getting rid of a video clip doctored to make it looks as if she was intoxicated and slurring her statement.
Ingraham stated calls for Facebook to get rid of the video clip happened to be a “pretext or be in a position to suppress voices.”
Subsequently, throughout the segment, Ingraham exhibited revealing visual photos regarding individuals she classified as well known voices censored on social mass media.
2020 Democratic hopeful Pete Buttigieg accused President Donald Trump on Friday of “deteriorating the ethics regarding the military” for pardoning or thinking about pardons for service members who have been convicted beneath the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, has increasingly leaned by himself military service — he served in the U.S. Navy Reserve in Afghanistan in 2014 — to describe a number of his personal views and policies, including his opinion on the usage of force and Trump receiving multiple draft deferments during the Vietnam War.