Category Archives: Finances

Should we take Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez seriously, and not literally?

Trump and Ocasio-Cortez are rash, unapologetic, and enigmatic New Yorkers with ardent cult followings. They will have equally tenuous associations with reality. While President Trump and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., stand starkly against one another, they are pretty similar in their refusal to accept the seriousness of the workplaces they hold.

To her credit, Ocasio-Cortez became the youngest person in the home of Representatives while operating as a waitress. That is a distinctly American accomplishment, one which deserves our admiration.

In order to his credit, Trump was a billionaire who paid attention to the lamentations of ordinary Americans and defeats out probably the most talented industry of presidential primary applicants inside our recent history to be the president of America.

The DNC and RNC establishments took neither Ocasio-Cortez nor Trump seriously, and today they are uniquely positioned to determine the terms of these policies and strategies so that they should start acting honestly like it.

Ocasio-Cortez’s gripes with fact-checking rough mirror billionaire business owner and Trump ally Peter Thiel’s distillation of the president’s relationship along with his critics.

“I think a significant factor that needs to be distinguished here is that the mass media is always getting Trump literally. It is no way takes him seriously, but it usually takes him actually,” Thiel told the Nationwide Press Club through the 2016 election, channeling columnist Salena Zito. “I believe lots of voters who vote for Trump get Trump seriously, however, not literally, when they hear things such as the Muslim comment or the walls comment, their question isn’t, ‘Are you likely to build a walls like the Great Walls of China?’ or, you understand, ‘How exactly will you enforce these assessments?’ What they hear will be we are going to possess a saner, a lot more sensible immigration policy.”

Thiel’s evaluation is correct. Nonetheless, it highlights a single flaw with both Trump and AOC’s methods in public messaging.

Both stoke fears when advocating their respective policies. Trump depends on fearmongering with the imagery of “rapists and murderers” crossing our southern border to outlandishly advocate for pretty commonsense border protection. AOC forebodes that “like, the planet is gonna finish in 12 many years,” if we don’t deal with climate change, accurately diagnosing our political sphere’s apathy towards climate modify, but ineptly advocating for an Eco-friendly New Deal that may do nothing to lessen greenhouse gasoline emissions and everything to nationalize vast swaths of the United States economy.

We do not doubt that Trump, a Queen’s outsider who built his brand name to enter the billionaires’ golf club, and Ocasio-Cortez, a millennial self-starter who has observed – first-hand – a couple of failures of the best economic system in history, genuinely wish to prove their authority within their positions.

However, they ought to begin rising to the event. They are not courtroom jesters, eliciting few times of reality, bookended by jokes and nonsense. They are users and cultural leaders of the governing bodies of the free world, and the general public and the media, on both sides of the aisles, must keep them compared to that standard.

Senate Republicans heighten issues regarding Stephen Moore’s sexist documents

 Stephen Moore of the Heritage Foundation is interviewed in his Washington office on August 31, 2016. Tom Williams/ CQ-Roll Call/ Getty Images

Herman Cain is definitely not the sole debatable individual Trump has regarded as pertaining to the Federal government Reserve board. The following seven days, Senate Republicans are struggling with an additional pick the chief executive has floated pertaining to the economic body: conservative commentator Stephen Moore.

Moore has yet to become legally nominated, but the outcry over sexist articles he has recently released deriding the female participation in sports activities signifies it may not appear.

Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst, the fourth-ranking Republican inside the Senate meeting, has become one of the most expressive contributer to the GOP in sounding the alert in regards to a range of content Moore published for National Review in the early 2000s.

The push-back over Moore is becoming considerably more obvious recently, as a developing range of Republicans have mentioned queries regarding his capability to get proved.

Although Moore continues to be determined in seeking this candidate selection, he is also declared that he would reflect on pulling out from the process in the event that his confirmation may jeopardize lawmakers’ electoral probabilities.

More about Stephen Moore and his sexist remarks

Let’s keep it real, Do 83% of Trump’s tax cut benefits go to the 1% or is the American people being hoodwinked when it comes to taxes?

Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont showed up at a CNN presidential town hall Monday night. After his first question to the audience, Sanders argued that President Donald Trump “said he’d have a tax plan that will benefit the middle class, but 83% for the benefits go to the 1%.”

The research shows that for 2018 tax year, the top 1% benefits from the tax cut and will received 20.5% of those benefits from the tax cuts.

The tax reform passed in December 2017 included tax cuts for corporations along with individuals — but even though the benefits for business were permanent, the person taxpayer cuts will expire by 2027. If Congress does nothing to extend them, the top 1% will at that point receive roughly 83% for the tax cut benefits, relating to estimates through the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.

More information on Taxes