There are times when we think that we know the laws of the land, but do we really know them. I asked several people about their rights as a citizen. I was surprised that many individuals did not know their rights on jobs, are in the general public. When I was coming up in school, they taught us civics. It is a shame that many people do not know anything about civics. I asked another person did they know what civics was. The reply was, that they believe it was something that dealt with an alien take over of the world. I could not do nothing but laugh. Whatever alien that has taken over the world is from the planet ignoramus. Whatever happened, it erased knowledge of the past and is now on course of a scary future.
Government and most states’ laws prohibit workplace race bigotry. In fact, Title VII — the federal law that forbids race discrimination — has recently been on the books for almost five decades now. However, apparently, some business employers have not gotten the message, because racial discrimination still happens more often than anyone wants to believe. Inside fact, it is the most common type of discrimination employees are accountable to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal agency that enforces Title VII.
Discrimination pays a very high price, both from the victims and from the companies that let it occur. Legal cases in recent times have proven this point, as large companies have experienced to pay for a huge amount to compensate the sufferers of competition discrimination and also to pay for their complicity in motivating or allowing a discriminatory atmosphere to prosper in the work environment.
An employer does race discrimination when it makes job judgments by nationality or when it retreats into seemingly unbiased job guidelines that disproportionately affect members of a particular contest.
Federal and most states’ laws and regulations prohibit race elegance in every aspect of employment, including employing, firing, promotions, compensation, job training, discipline, and termination.
Whenever an employer deliberately public out candidates or employees of a particular race for less favorable treatment, that is “disparate treatment” discrimination. However, the burden falls more heavily on employees of a particular race, that is “disparate impact” discrimination.
An employee who makes a disparate treatment claim alleges that he or she was handled differently than other employees who were in similar situations, due to employee’s competition. For example, a boss promotes only white employees to remedies positions, requires only job seekers of a certain race to submit to drug tests, or refuses to allow employees of certain races to deal with customers.
An employer that discriminates by physical characteristics associated with a particular race — such as hair texture or color, skin color, or facial features — also commits disparate treatment discrimination.
In a disparate impact legal action, the employee does not state that the employer purposely singled out employees of a particular race for bad treatment. Instead, the employee claims that the employer’s apparently neutral policy, rule, or practice has a disproportionately negative effect on users of a particular competition.
For example, a work policy requiring men to be clean-shaven may discriminate against African-American men, who are more likely to experience Pseudofolliculitis barbae (a painful skin condition triggered and exacerbated by shaving). A minimum height need may screen out excessive numbers of Asian Us and Latino job candidates. Analysis on hiring any applicant with an arrest or conviction record could disproportionately affect Latino and Black men.
If an employee implies that a particular policy has a disproportionate impact on members of the particular race, the employer can defend the plan by showing that there is a legitimate, important, job-related reason that necessitates the policy. For example, a height requirement might be justified if the employer can present that an employee must be at least a certain level to operate a particular type of machinery. However, an employer would be hard-pressed to justify a level requirement for a office position.
Harassment is also restricted. Harassment is any behavior based on a person’s actions that create an overwhelming, hostile, or offensive work environment or interferes with the individual’s works performance. Harassing might include racial slurs, jokes in regards to a particular ethnic group, physical acts of significance to a certain racial group.
Not every joke or inappropriate remark could be harassment, from a legal perspective. Place of work conduct must be unwelcome. Also it must be adequately severe or pervasive to change the conditions and conditions of the victim’s employment, to qualify as harassment. If the conduct is extreme, an individual incident might be enough to create a hostile environment. Physical assault, use of “the N-word, ” or hanging a noose, for example, might be so threatening and insulting as to be a nuisance. In the event the comments or functions are much less offensive, they will constitute harassment if they often happen enough to change the workplace surroundings.
Reference
What Is Race Discrimination? | Nolo.com. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/fighting-race-national-origin-discriminat
As a blogger, I know that some may not share my thoughts and belief, however, I believe whether we agree with people or not, that we should have a love for our neighbor. I might not agree with my neighbor, but love is what brings us together. I overheard a conversation about the LGBT community, and while listening to the statements, I was applaud of what was coming out of Christians mouths. I was asked for my response; I said answered with a question, who in the shop has a perfect life? The shop went quiet. Who has committed sin in their mind while being angry with another person? How many have lusted after a woman? Still no answer. I responded, “Do not use God as a pon because God is not a Pon. Using the Bible to an AK47 to shoot people down does not give you that right to do unjust drive-by shootings with your lips. The same Bible used to enslave, was the same Bible used to kill millions of Jew, the same Bible used to oppress women was that same Bible that was used to deny rights to individuals who are different, and this was the same Bible used to write a constitution that excluded American Indians. Then I processed to say; there is a difference between reading the Bible and Studying the Bible. Studying means that you struggle with text and critically break that text down using the actual language, Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. If one is not critically translating this text in its original form, I have questions. So, before quoting scripture make sure you know what you are saying because King James I was a homosexual and murderer.
Afer contemplating Mr. Trumps obsessiveness towards this new anchor, I wonder if there was any wrong. My conclusion was that this was an attack on women. Any individual who makes sexist remark toward women has a problem. Click on the link and you would be repulsed. This
I am glad that someone is speaking up about the occurrences at these rallies. This is not a show; this is a reality. Individual prepare themselves by studying political science, and learning law to be leaders in government. Are they perfect, no, but it is possible for change to happen. It may take a long or short time. The nation continues to grow, and there is room for improvement. Laws that was intended to segregate have been debated for years. Legislation that oppressed people because of race, ethnicity, gender, age and orientation gradually changes for the better. It is not too late, to stand for justice
Many individuals are immigrants to this country. The country is made up of immigrants. All people have the right to live in a safe community. When individual make a distinction between them and us, this is not okay. The prejudices and biases should not be a part of the political arena. Just to repeat this slogan, “Let’s make America great again.” America was already great before invader came to took the land forcing people off of their land, extinguishing their culture, forcing them not to practice their belief, outlawing them to speak their language. Immigrants bring rich cultural traditions that help to build America. If cultural richness is taking away, we as a society has failed and fallen short of what is means to be a progressive and productive society.
.
I believe everyone should have their say or present their case to a committee. However, scare tactics does not work or bullying others show that they are not really who they are inside. In saying that I would rather have someone in politics that knows the system. It is just like saying you are a mechanic, but you do not know anything about working of cars. Your ability and skills will determine if you are capable of being in whatever position one works. A pretender never gets away, because time will determine if one is really up to the task.

White privilege (or white skin privilege) is a phrase for societal privileges that benefit or cater to people identified as white in Western countries, beyond exactly what is common which affect non-white people by the same social, political, or economic circumstances. Academic perspectives such as critical race theory and whiteness studies use the understanding of “white privilege” to investigate how racism and racialized societies affect the lives of white or white-skinned people.
Racism is believed to end up being the act of discriminating against a person or a group of people predicated on social belief or the geological difference between people. A person’s family genealogy determines whether one is born Caucasian, African-American, Chinese, Hispanic, or possibly a mix of ethnicity altogether. The human genome may be the set of total genetic information for humans, which is coded as DNA sequences within twenty-three chromosomal pairings.
The reason for the missing chromosome 23 lies within the genealogy of the individuals affected. Researchers have already been in a position to map the missing chromosome back again to at least eight generations in a single family, meaning the condition has existed for hundreds of years. If a person’s mother and father were both missing the chromosome, their children had a one-hundred percent chance of being born without it as well
Nevertheless, individuals who decide to contest that racism is inherent have made every effort to note their view with suggestions that racism is biological in origin. For instance, when white Americans view black people, there is an augmented action in the amygdala (Measured using fMRI), a brain structure relates to sentiment and, particularly, with the recognition of threats. Even so, Even, the correlation between psychological responses and biological relations do not show if the reactions are flatly natural. Within research completed by Avoi Telzer of UCLA wherein amygdala research were sung the national anthem upon kids, presently there made an appearance to become a unique thought: the racial level of sensitivity in the amygdala will not consider impact before the age group from 12-15.

the other thing that’s unprecedented will be the anti-Muslim bigotry has moved to everyday consumers,” Hooper indicated, “In the previous attacks, like after 9-11, Islamophobia was on the fringes of society.”
Muslims have an excuse to be scared of both anti-Muslim attackers and overbearing police forces whose surveillance of mosques generates mistrust, Sarsour said. Since at least 2002, the NYPD has begun “suspicionless surveillance of Muslims in The big apple and beyond,” as stated by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). “It is chilling free speech in our community,” Sarsour said of one’s surveillance. “People do not trust the individuals in our community. We do not know that is an informant, who is not an informant.”