Tag Archives: genetics

genetics, Humankind, Science

Would you like to know that a human genome has finally been fully decoded?

Leave a comment

The genome of a single sperm contains the genetic material of one pair of paternal chromosomes.

Researcher Kevin Bishop looks at zebrafish samples. Techniques used to sequence the human genome can also be applied to other species. Ernesto Del Aguila III / National Institutes of Health

Researchers are re-analyzing 92 percent of the genome to look for genetic variants that may be causing illnesses. “We identified many more, tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands” of new variants, says David Dennis. In addition, researchers can better investigate how centromere proteins assemble and what happens when they alter or lose function using the new genome. As part of his research, Evan Eichler aims to decode the genetic code on paternal and maternal chromosomes. By systematically sequencing a large number of individuals from diverse origins, he claims that it would be possible to better understand the genetic variation of the globe and identify relevant genetic variants.

Reference

A human genome has finally been fully decoded. https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/human-genome-finally-fully-decoded-rcna22029?fbclid=IwAR0dGb_i9ckxLcACA777uZcg4BCAUPLDfwMJw2t65P_WNw2rxeHj_i9QU_E

environmental, Fitness, Health

DNA diet could help you fit into your jeans

Leave a comment

Many people have this basic understanding of genetics: You inherit genes from your parents, and their DNA combines to create your specific genetic makeup. This will include more obvious traits such as for instance eye color and height but also more complicated traits which could involve multiple genes, such as threat of diseases including diabetes, heart problems, obesity and cancer, in addition to every aspect of metabolism.

The Human Genome Project — a global 13-year collaboration that mapped out all of the genes in humans — discovered approximately 50,000 variances (differences within the individual DNA code) in our genetic code that will change lives in how your system functions.

What lots of people might not realize is that there clearly was a substantial interaction in the middle of your environment and your genes, along with your diet is one of the most basic and potentially modifiable the different parts of your environment.

Behavioral Science, Culture, Ethics, Health, History, Politics, Social Justice

Exploring Darwin’ and looking at genetic engineering — What does this mean to humanity as a whole?

Leave a comment

 

For a vast amounts of years, existence on the planet developed through the steps involved in Darwinian evolution by way of natural selection: Tiny mistakes at the time of reproduction propagate from father and mother to children, sometimes providing some a survival benefit to search for food or combat opponents. Had reproduction been ideal, the sole living beings on the planet could well be single-celled microorganisms, your 3.5 billion-year-old ancestors and forefathers. We are, actually quite literally, the product of reproductive system errors and planetary cataclysms. All of us — and other kinds of living beings — are classified as the mutants who made it in a environment that threw various curved balls our way. Even now, in spite of life’s amazing resiliency, up to this aspect the progression of existence on the planet has become a unaggressive course of action. Genes mutated in arbitrary ways, without any individual at the helm.

The waters of ancestral meddling happen to be murky, and Metzl skillfully critiques where we have been during the past as a guide for where this can be all advancing. Though, eugenics can be described as destructive case in point. To manage mating with the objective of enhancing the human populace seems nearly as bad as the things we do with winning prize bulls and race horses. On the other hand, with human beings it can be substantially even worse, as diverse societal and governmental ideological agendas will have extremely diverse opinions of what “improvement” requires. Terrible criminal offenses against humankind were perpetrated in the name of various concerns of “improvement.” In the initial half of the Twentieth century, hundreds and hundreds of individuals in mental establishments and crooks in the U.S. ended up being sterilized devoid of their acquiescence. In 1925, Hitler published in Mein Kampf, “The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker.” Within a number of years after acquiring power during 1933, the Nazis sterilized approximately 400,000 Germans. And then, inevitably, the more intense was still to arrive.

Comment from the author:

I think provided the past and present history of world-wide discord, such serious modification at a world-wide level can simply manifest when we discover ourselves above all as a solitary species, trying to enhance ourselves in general. Maybe, the prodding debate, which Metzl did not suggest, will come from realizing that all of us succeed by numbers but not by tribal remoteness. This might be the language that both government authorities and market factors must accept to prevent substantial social unrest. The survival may possibly be based upon this.

 

 

Behavioral Science, Culture, Social Justice

Could Being a Racist be a Genetic Defect?

1 Comment

genetic 1Racism is believed to end up being the act of discriminating against a person or a group of people predicated on social belief or the geological difference between people. A person’s family genealogy determines whether one is born Caucasian, African-American, Chinese, Hispanic, or possibly a mix of ethnicity altogether. The human genome may be the set of total genetic information for humans, which is coded as DNA sequences within twenty-three chromosomal pairings.

Researchers in the Genome Laboratory by WIT are conducting innovative DNA research that testifies persons of a racist mother nature are born without the vital “Chromosome 23, ” and this racism is, actually, a Genetic Disorder. Upon much genome mapping trials, WIT has had the opportunity to determine that folks born with racist inclinations only show twenty-two chromosome pairs, instead of the normal twenty-three. Without Chromosome 23, folks are more susceptible to racist activities and tendencies. Scientists imagine the racism disorder found within Chromosome 22, and it is prevalent in one in three-hundred people.

genetic 2The reason for the missing chromosome 23 lies within the genealogy of the individuals affected. Researchers have already been in a position to map the missing chromosome back again to at least eight generations in a single family, meaning the condition has existed for hundreds of years. If a person’s mother and father were both missing the chromosome, their children had a one-hundred percent chance of being born without it as well
To reason that beings are inherently racist is beyond the scope of credibility. Before the development of transportation, it was almost impossible for different racial groups to have interacted.Therefore, it could be interpreted it is certainly not plausible the human family tree, through development, acclimatised a great intuitive and inherent respond to people of various racial organizations.

genetic 3Nevertheless, individuals who decide to contest that racism is inherent have made every effort to note their view with suggestions that racism is biological in origin. For instance, when white Americans view black people, there is an augmented action in the amygdala (Measured using fMRI), a brain structure relates to sentiment and, particularly, with the recognition of threats. Even so, Even, the correlation between psychological responses and biological relations do not show if the reactions are flatly natural. Within research completed by Avoi Telzer of UCLA wherein amygdala research were sung the national anthem upon kids, presently there made an appearance to become a unique thought: the racial level of sensitivity in the amygdala will not consider impact before the age group from 12-15.

Furthermore, once it requires effect, it does not affect each congruently. It uncovered that the most diverse the peer group, the weaker the amygdala effect. In circumstances where diversity is prominent, the finish line result disappeared completely. The creators of the studies mentioned the fact that ”these findings recommend that neural biases to race are not innate and that competition is a social building, discovered eventually. ”

Of course, it is imprudent to assume that we are all born innocent. While we are not innately racist, it is in some way natural to us to ‘select’ and ‘categorise. ’ It appears that development offers willing us to determine willingly entire units of individuals as the nemesis. However, when determining this antagonist – classifying the ‘outcast’ – some are prepared to become very compliant. The externalised group can become explained and ‘ characterised ’ by the religious beliefs, language or pores and skin colour. Clearly, it is certainly almost all contingent which group all of us consider to become ominous for one’s well-being and securities.

It is fair to say that race is a social paradigm. It does not intrinsically draw a parallel with this prototypes of anxiety or distrust or phobia, even though it can become one. Thus, it is within one’s authority to foster a social order whereby race is not a philosophical construct.

Reference

Racism: Is It Inherent or Learned? – MyMPN. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.mintpressnews.com/MyMPN/racism-inherent-learned/

The genetics of being gay – Page 18 – politicalhotwire.com. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://politicalhotwire.com/sexuality/118057-genetics-being-gay-18.html

Why say Thais, when 99% are? – Page 6 – General topics … (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/834468-why-say-thais-when-99-are/page-6