Tag Archives: political arena

President Donald Trump is increasingly isolated

In his accusations of electoral fraud, President Donald Trump is increasingly isolated. His intelligence chief says that international rivals are seeking to weaken trust in democratic processes. Attorney General Bill Barr has disappointed Trump by saying that the Department of Justice has found no proof of systemic fraud. An election security officer shot a tweet about what Trump called a “highly misleading” election comment. “It’s clear to me, and I think most Americans,” Krebs told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Friday, “that the election is over. “We’ve got to get this past.”
Some of the administration officials Krebs served with the most closely on the election were bolder in their rebukes to the President. Commissioner Ben Hovland of the Election Assistance Commission called Trump’s comments “misleading” and “insulting” The country’s top counter-intelligence official said Wednesday that he was worried about post-election conspiracy theories.While Trump rants about votes, Why none of his election security officials support him?

While Trump rants about votes, none of his election security officials support him. https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/04/politics/trump-election-security-officials/index.html

Supreme Court challenges of partisan gerrymanding

At issue appears to be whenever politicians get too far in drawing lines for partisan gain, plus it may be the most critical cases of the court’s term. The justices could, for the very first time, begin a typical to choose when politicians go too far in drawing lines for partisan gain, or perhaps the court could slam the doorways shut on such claims of extreme gerrymandering.

Chief Justice John Roberts recommended at one point so it will be demanding of the court to police the usage of partisanship in map drawing, once the process is intrinsically governmental. Justice Samuel Alito emerged as the utmost vocal critic of the court’s involvement, frequently picking apart the manageability of tests that were presented to the court and worrying that every single dispute the future would have to be solved because of the judiciary.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh — whose vote may be key — stated he would not “dispute” that extreme partisan gerrymandering has to turn into a problem that has been especially obvious in a map drawn in their house state of Maryland. But he also questioned if courts should remain from the issue because states are reacting using their initiatives. It was a belief provided by Justice Neil Gorsuch, who said states have “provided treatments in this certain area.”

Where John Roberts appears to be unlikely to compromise
The liberal justices suggested which they believed that the court could when it comes to the first time, establish a workable standard.

Justice Stephen Breyer, perhaps sensing the reticence of the conservatives, suggested that the court could create a test that could target only those maps that represented exactly what he called “outliers.”

This kind of test, Breyer stated, will be “absolutely simple” and eliminate the most blatant examples of politicians relying too greatly on a party to attract maps. Justice Elena Kagan stated that maps used Maryland had been excessive under “any measure.”

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, an active participant at dental arguments, worried that beneath the current system, the effect of an individual’s vote could be “reduced” according to the voter’s celebration affiliation.

Critics say that if the court chooses to remain out of this issue, it’ll entrench the celebration in charge of drawing the lines.

No standard on partisan gerrymandering
The last term, all eyes had been on Justice Anthony Kennedy, who many thoughts ended up being on the verge — for the very first time — of articulating a legal standard that courts can use moving forward. He was considered the move vote. While the conservatives on the bench suggested the issue should be kept to your branches that are political Kennedy was unwilling to bar all future claims of damage from partisan gerrymander.

But finally, the court sidestepped the merits for the instances and Kennedy retired — dashing the hopes of experts of extreme gerrymandering that is partisan whom thought he might be their final opportunity to stop politicians from illegally attempting to entrench energy for one party over another. Before the court now are a couple of instances arising from new york and Maryland. Democrats challenging Republican-drawn maps bring one, the other appears to be Republicans challenging an accessible route. The lower courts struck the maps and provided the justices with several potential tests grounded in the very first Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause along with other areas for the Constitution to determine a brand new standard.

“These instances are concerning the representation we enter federal, state and local officials all in the united states,” stated Justin Levitt, a professor of law at Loyola Law School, that has finalized a brief in support of the challengers.

New York
Rucho v. Common Cause ended up being brought by voting rights groups and Democratic voters, among others, who argue that New York’s 2016 districting that is congressional ended up being unconstitutional. They state the map drawn by Republican legislators amounted to an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander that intentionally diluted the electoral energy of individuals who oppose Republicans.

Allison Riggs for the coalition that is southern personal Justice argued in court documents that the map drawers “divided clusters of Democrats that may have anchored congressional districts and submerged the fragments within larger masses of Republicans.”

Riggs points out that Republicans won 53% for the vote in the 2016 election, but they also won 10 of the 13 congressional seats.

Riggs warns the justices that if they do not become part of now, the usage of politics will only worsen as map drawers depend increasingly on redistricting software that is more sophisticated and research has revealed that the ideological gap between Democrats and Republicans in Congress appears to be bigger than ever before.

She said that if the Supreme Court rules that the issue must be left of the legislative branches, the 2016 plan will likely to be the revolution for the future.” In the 2020 cycle and beyond, both parties will emulate — or exceed — its abuses, openly entrenching by themselves in power using the array that is full of mapmaking technologies,” she stated.

A lower life expectancy court ruled in support of the challengers on same security grounds, holding that individual districts discriminated against voters, and therefore the master plan also violated the First Amendment, for punishing people considering the way that they had formerly voted.

Maryland One other instance, Lamone v. Benisek, arises from Maryland. A reduced court blocked the map, keeping that individuals within the district had been retaliated against according to how that they had voted, in violation of the initial Amendment.

This instance ended up being brought by seven Republican voters, who argue that Democratic then-Gov. Martin O’Malley, who had been overseeing the redistricting procedure, took specific aim at the state’s 6th Congressional District.

” To that particular end, map compartments methodically dismantled the sixth district, breaking aside large swaths of territory dominated by rural Republicans and changing all of them with smaller, densely populated areas dominated by suburban Democrats,” their attorney, Michael Kimberly, argued in court documents.

The officials targeted some 66,000 Republicans within the district and included some 24,000 Democratic voters, therefore swinging the region, based on court papers. The challengers pointed to O’Malley’s very own statements, as he stated it was “also my intent to produce a region in which the social people would become more likely to elect a Democrat than a Republican.”

June the justices should rule on both cases by the end.

As a Society We Need to Embrace Difference, Are We Doing Enough to Stand Up for Individual Who Are Different?

trump anger 2Many individuals are immigrants to this country. The country is made up of immigrants. All people have the right to live in a safe community. When individual make a distinction between them and us, this is not okay. The prejudices and biases should not be a part of the political arena. Just to repeat this slogan, “Let’s make America great again.” America was already great before invader came to took the land forcing people off of their land, extinguishing their culture, forcing them not to practice their belief, outlawing them to speak their language. Immigrants bring rich cultural traditions that help to build America. If cultural richness is taking away, we as a society has failed and fallen short of what is means to be a progressive and productive society.

Any time Donald Trump speaks in one of his rallies, Gisell Broch physically responds. She cringes.
“He’s just like a punch to the full gut. ”
That punch is so palpable
“He’s a racist, said Broch, from her front row seat in a naturalization information session inside Homestead, Florida. When Broch files her paperwork, the girl expects she will vote for Trump.
Trump’s campaign pledge to build a wall along the U. S. -Mexico border and his declaration that Mexico sends crooks, drugs and rapists directly into America have become the rallying cry for Latinos. The Trump campaign states his proposed immigration reconstructs will finish up reaping helpful benefits legal Latino immigrants.
Like the noticeable protests at Trump’s rallies, quiet but powerful protests have been making among immigrants who are long term residents in the Combined States since Trump’s strategy announcement last June.
Just what it would decide to use build Trump’s border wall 02: 34
Figures from  Citizenship and Migration Services show a 14. 5% jump in naturalization applications in June-December regarding 2015 compared with typically the same six months in the particular previous year. Federal info does not break down those applications by competition, but grass-roots organizations, just like the Florida Immigrant Cabale, say their naturalization drives across their swing state are filled mainly by simply Latinos.
“They feel unsafe with his phrases, ” said Florida Migrant Coalition spokesman Ivan Parriza. “They desire to be respected. Regarding them, it is an emergency. ”
Parra has been among the attorneys weaving through people from table to be able to table in a given space at a mall within Lauderhill, Florida. The occasion opened at ten. But, the line had begun to form at five a. Marielle., said Broward County Commissioner Dale Holness. At the very least 50, individuals showed upward without appointments, hoping to begin filing paperwork.
Holness stated in the 40 many years he’s lived in Fl, he’s never seen these individual residents filing for citizenship. Naturalization advocates say applications spiked in election years, but this particular year has been remarkable.
“Trump’s tone makes people scared. Though he’s often saying ‘illegal, individuals with been here don’t feel secure either. They can be next. So regarding one, they want to protect themselves, so they don’t get thrown away for just for any reason. Two, they will want to ensure they’re involved to the extent that will they can contribute to being able to insure that Trump’s not the person, ” this individual said.
Grass-roots groups point to the enormous population that for many many years didn’t pursue citizenship, usually citing the $680 charge as a factor. Even though permanent residents are qualified to vote in close and state elections, just citizens can vote. The opportunity presented seems to get trumped that once-prohibitive cost to utilize said Catholic Legal Services’ Raul Hernandez.
“If that will is the motivation regarding them to become people, I welcome the determination, ” said Hernandez. He or she adds that if those residents become naturalized, “it’s a game changer. inches
“It’s going to end up being an entirely different political situation — folks using a different view of being a citizen.
New poll: 3 away of 4 Hispanics ‘don’t like Trump’ 01: fifty-eight
Data from the University or college of Southern California Centre for your Study of Immigrant Integration shows in typically the United States, 4. five million Latinos are entitled to naturalization. In the particular swing states, those potential voters are a sizeable voting bloc. Nevada has more than 64, 000 qualified to become citizens. The state of Colorado has some 57, 1000. Florida is home to 415, 000, based on Catholic Legal Services.
In Republican strongholds, the numbers offer a glimpse into typically the future. Arizona has from least 139, 000 Latinos eligible to become naturalized. Texas has at the very least 750, 000.
“This will be a direct result associated with his words, ” stated Maria Elena Salinas, Univision anchor, and vocal Donald Trump critic. “This period around this is diverse. They’re going to stop Donald Trump. ”
Salinas, the co-anchor of Noticiero Univision, typically the nightly newscast of the USA States’ most-watched Spanish-language television network and is a single of the most identified and trusted Latina press in Americatrump anger 2.
Soon after Trump entered the race, Salinas penned an editorial greatly criticizing the Republican front-runner. She also anchors together with Jorge Ramos, famously thrown out of an Overcome news conference when he or she attempted to confront Trump on his immigration plans and refused to take a seat.
Univision is owned just by Haim Saban, a wealthy political donor who provides poured millions into Hillary Clinton’s super PACs and candidacy.
Univision, as the powerful media conglomerate, offers joined unapologetically with grass-roots groups to have out typically the Latino vote in Nov.

Salinas sees this election season as a struggle that Latinos have combined to get on. “You feel it. You know Donald Trump is your enemy, as they declared war. He declared us enemies. There’s something powerful to say regarding the vote. It’s a weapon. ”
According to what Salinas has seen this election cycle, she can make this prediction: “The similar group he is attacking is the one to stop him from going to the White House. Inside November with this year, the Latino vote is going to stop Donald Trump. ”
Sixty-four-year-old Colombian local Edgar Ripoll plans to become a part of that block that stops Trump within November. In the USA States since 1991, Ripoll raised his two youngsters in the States and sent one son to the U. S. military. The attraction of his life had been working hard and dwelling lawfully and peacefully. Nevertheless, the anger that’s the particular driving emotion in Trump’s rise has captured Ripoll this election. Ripoll is angry as well, plus is channeling that rage into his first political election this November.
“Many regarding us are against their campaign and his guidelines, ” he said. Enjoying off Trump’s campaign slogan of “Make America Great Again, ” Ripoll additional, “Latinos make the nation great. ”


“Latinos line up to get naturalized and stop Trump – ABC-7.com …” Insert Name of Site in Italics. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 Mar. 2016 <http://www.abc-7.com/story/31489744/latinos-line-up-to-get-naturalized-and-stop-&gt;.