Trauma May Be Woven Into DNA of Native Americans

 

genetic 2
Trauma is big news right now. Mainstream media is full of stories in regards to the dramatic improvements allowing science to find out more clearly how trauma affects our bodies, minds and even our genes. Most of the coverage hails the scientific connection between trauma and illness as a breakthrough for modern medicine. The following breakthrough are going to be how trauma affects our offspring.

The science of epigenetics, literally “above the gene,” proposes that people pass on more than DNA in our genes; it implies that our genes can hold memories of trauma experienced by our ancestors and can influence exactly how we respond to trauma and stress. The Academy of Pediatrics reports that the way in which genes work in our anatomies determines neuroendocrine structure and is strongly affected by experience. [Neuroendocrine cells assist the nervous and endocrine (hormonal) system work together to produce substances such as adrenaline (the hormone linked to the fight or flight response.] Trauma experienced by earlier generations can influence the dwelling of our genes, making them very likely to “switch on” negative responses to stress and trauma.

In light of this emerging science and how it really works because of the way we respond to trauma, the AAP stated in its publication, Adverse Childhood Experiences additionally the Lifelong Consequences of Trauma, “Never before within the history of medicine have we had better understanding of the factors that determine the fitness of an individual from infancy to adulthood, which is area of the life course perspective—a means of looking at life not as disconnected stages but as integrated across time,” according to the AAP in their recent publication examining the role of Adverse Childhood Experience (ACES) on our development and health. The now famous 1998 ACES study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Kaiser Permanente showed that such adverse experiences could play a role in mental and physical illness.

“Native healers, medicine people and elders have always known this which is common knowledge in Native oral traditions,” according to LeManuel “Lee” Bitsoi, Navajo, PhD Research Associate in Genetics at Harvard University. (Courtesy SACNAS)“Native healers, medicine people and elders have always known this which is well known in Native oral traditions,” according to LeManuel “Lee” Bitsoi, Navajo, PhD Research Associate in Genetics at Harvard University. (Courtesy SACNAS)
Folks in Indian country wonder what took science such a long time to catch up with traditional Native knowledge. “Native healers, medicine people and elders have always known this which is well known in Native oral traditions,” according to LeManuel “Lee” Bitsoi, Navajo, PhD Research Associate in Genetics at Harvard University during his presentation at the Gateway to Discovery conference in 2013.

Based on Bitsoi, epigenetics is just starting to uncover scientific proof that intergenerational trauma is real. Historical trauma, therefore, is seen as a contributing cause when you look at the growth of illnesses such as for example PTSD, depression and type 2 diabetes.

What exactly is historical or intergenerational trauma? Michelle M. Sotero, an instructor in Health Care Administration and Policy in the University of Nevada, offers a three-fold definition. Into the initial phase, the dominant culture perpetrates mass trauma on a population in the form of colonialism, slavery, war or genocide. Within the second phase the affected population shows physical and psychological symptoms in reaction into the trauma. In the final phase, the original population passes these responses to trauma to subsequent generations, who in turn display similar symptoms.

In accordance with researchers, high rates of addiction, suicide, mental illness, sexual violence as well as other ills among Native peoples could be, at least to some extent, impacted by historical trauma. Bonnie Duran, associate professor during the Department of Health Services in the University of Washington School of Public health insurance and Director for Indigenous Health Research during the Indigenous Wellness Research Institute says, “Many present-day health disparities can be traced back through epigenetics to a “colonial health deficit,” the result of colonization and its aftermath.”

Based on the American Indian and Alaska Native Genetics Research Guide developed by the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI), studies have shown that various behavior and health problems are due to inherited epigenetic changes.

Authors for the guide make reference to a 2008 study by Moshe Szyf at McGill University in Montreal that examined the brains of suicide victims. Szyf along with his team unearthed that genes governing stress response in the victim’s hippocampus had been methylated or switched off. Excessive trauma causes us to make hormones called glucocorticoids which can alter gene expression. Chronic exposure to this hormone can inhibit genes within the hippocampus ability to regulate glucocorticoids. Szyf suggested that the genes were powered down in reaction to a number of events, such as abuse during childhood. All victims into the study were abused as children.

Nature or Nurture? It’s Both!

Szyf, in collaboration with another scientist at McGill, Neurobiologist Michael Meaney, did research showing a difference within the hippocampus between adults rats raised by attentive and inattentive mothers. Adult offspring of inattentive rat mothers showed genes regulating sensitivity to stress to be highly methylated. The rats with attentive moms would not.

To try their research they switched the parents for rat babies born to bad and good mothers. The babies born to attentive moms but given to inattentive moms also developed highly methylated genes and grew to be skittish adults. The exact opposite proved true for babies born to bad moms but given to good moms. As adults the rat babies born to bad moms but raised by good mothers appeared calm.

This research generally seems to combine the historically polarizing theory of nature versus nurture in determining behavior. Nature is the fact that which can be inherited while nurture may be the environmental influences.

Native researcher Teresa Brockie PhD, Research Nurse Specialist at the National Institute of Health implies that such gene methylation is related to health disparities among Native Americans. In her own article in Nursing and Research and Practice, she along with her research colleagues remember that high ACE’s (Adverse Childhood Experience) scores have now been associated with methylation of genes that regulate the strain response. They further noted that endocrine and immune disorders may also be associated with methylation of such genes.

The researchers discovered that Native peoples have high rates of ACE’s and health conditions such as for example posttraumatic stress, depression and drug abuse, diabetes all associated with methylation of genes regulating the body’s response to stress. “The persistence of stress connected with discrimination and historical trauma converges to add immeasurably to these challenges,” the researchers wrote.

While there is a dearth of studies examining these findings, the researchers stated they certainly were unable to conclude a direct cause between epigenetics and high rates of certain diseases among Native Americans.

Certainly one of researchers, Dr. Jessica Gill, Principal Investigator, Brain Injury Unit, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Nursing Research wrote in response to questions to your NIH’s public affairs office, “Epigenetic studies provide a distinctive opportunity to characterize the long-term impact of stressors including historical trauma on the function of genes. The modification of gene function through epigenetic modifications can greatly impact the fitness of the average person and might underlie some of the health disparities that we observe in populations including Native Americans. This type of research is of good promise for nurse scientists, because it is going to be instrumental within the promotion associated with the health and well-being of patients relying on trauma and stress.”

Although epigenetics offers the hope of developing better and much more specific medicines and interventions for mental health problems, in addition suggests the notion that Native peoples as well as other ethnic groups could be genetically inferior.

Researchers such as for example Shannon Sullivan, professor of philosophy at UNC Charlotte, suggests in her own article “Inheriting Racist Disparities in Health: Epigenetics as well as the Transgenerational aftereffects of White Racism,” that the science has faint echoes of eugenics, the social movement claiming to enhance genetic features of humans through selective breeding and sterilization.

Inherited Resilience

Epigenetics is indeed a hot topic, and pharmaceutical companies are actively searching for epigenetic compounds that will help with learning and memory and help treat depression, anxiety and PTSD.

Many researchers caution, however, that the newest science could be getting in front of itself. “There is lots of research which should be done before we are going to understand whether and exactly how these methods work,” says Joseph Gone, professor at the University of Michigan and member of the Gros Ventre tribe of Montana.

Scientific developments such as for example epigenetics will offer exciting new insights not just into how our bodies react not only to trauma but in addition exactly how we find a way to survive it.

Native peoples power to maintain culture and feeling of who they are into the face of these a traumatic history suggests an inherited resilience that bears scientific examination as well, based on Gone.

Isolating and nurturing a resilience gene may well be being shown to people there.

Resource

The media have obtained a turning point in covering Donald Trump. He will possibly not survive it.

Trump in the news

Kenneth Dantzler-Corbin's avatarThe Dantzler Report!

trump-hands-headRepublican presidential candidate Donald Trump warned reporters May 31, “I will continue to attack the press.” He slammed parts of society at large as “dishonest” on a news conference about donations he raised for veterans’ groups at Trump Tower in New York city.

The news media have learned in for a large amount of criticism in terms they’ve reported this election, that makes it very similar to most other election. But something could possibly have changed just in the past few days. I seem to not a clue how meaningful it definitely change into or how much time it will last.
But it’s fairly likely that when we recall in the sweep with this most unusual campaign, we’ll mark today as a significant turning point: the amount of time when journalists finally found out learn how to cover Donald Trump.
They didn’t do it by creating some hyped model of…

View original post 1,237 more words

The media have obtained a turning point in covering Donald Trump. He will possibly not survive it.

 

trump-hands-headRepublican presidential candidate Donald Trump warned reporters May 31, “I will continue to attack the press.” He slammed parts of society at large as “dishonest” on a news conference about donations he raised for veterans’ groups at Trump Tower in New York city.

The news media have learned in for a large amount of criticism in terms they’ve reported this election, that makes it very similar to most other election. But something could possibly have changed just in the past few days. I seem to not a clue how meaningful it definitely change into or how much time it will last.
But it’s fairly likely that when we recall in the sweep with this most unusual campaign, we’ll mark today as a significant turning point: the amount of time when journalists finally found out learn how to cover Donald Trump.
They didn’t do it by creating some hyped model of coverage, or distributing and assigning what they were taught in journalism school. They’re performing by rediscovering the fundamental values and norms that may presupposed to guide their profession. (As well as for the record, although I’m part of “the media” I’m speaking among the third person here because I’m an opinion writer, which certainly is mostly about the reporters whose job it can be to objectively relay the events of one’s day).
If this evolution in coverage takes hold, we can trace it into the combined effect of a number of events and developments happening in a quick time period. The initial was Trump’s press conference on Tuesday, the ostensible objective of that was to answer questions on a fund-raiser he kept in January to improve money for veterans’ groups. For the duration the press conference, Trump reluctantly visited his petulant, abusive worst, attacking reporters generally and any within the room. “The political press is among the most dishonest people that I’ve ever met,” he stated, saying to one journalist who had asked an absolutely reasonable question, “You’re a sleaze.” These sorts of criticisms aren’t new — anybody who has reported a Trump rally can inform you how Trump always tosses some insults for the press, at this stage his supporters spin and hurl their own abuse at those covering the event — but Trump seemed particularly angry and unsettled.
To discover the state of the hot tub press checked out that revealing event, it’s critical to comprehend what resulted in it. It happened due to the reason that the Post’s David Fahrenthold and some other reporters did what journalists are supposed to do. They raised queries about Trump’s fund-raiser, and the moment they didn’t get adequate answers, they investigated, gathered facts, and asked more questions.
Match the ‘nasty’ reporter who got Trump to offer $1 million

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said he raised $6 million for veterans groups with a January fund-raiser. The Washington Post’s accounting, in accordance to interviews with charities, only found $3.2 million in donations to veterans groups. Additionally, almost four months after promising one million dollars of his own money to veterans’ causes, Trump gone to fulfill that pledge.

Finally it was excellent work — time-consuming, difficult, and ultimately paying dividends publicly understanding. And Trump’s attack for them for doing their jobs directions those jobs are purported to be performed couldn’t have also been better devised to get most other journalist to desire to accomplish exactly the same. They’re as simple as anyone else: While you have a direct attack upon their professionalism, they’re prone to react by reaching back to their profession’s core values to indicate that they may perform them. Trump may have needed to intimidate them, but it’s likely to hold the opposite effect.
Exactly the same day just like the press conference, a trove of documents from Trump University was released when you prepared the motorcycle for winter a class-action lawsuit accusing Trump of fraud. Your fax revealed allegations as to just what a scam that enterprise was: high-pressure sales tactics, nothing resembling knowledge being imparted towards the “students,” people in financial trouble preyed upon and told to do so go overdrawn on their credit cards to offer for more seminars and courses. Several of Trump’s other schemes could possibly have been comical, but as far as we know nobody was victimized too terribly by buying a Trump Steak or maybe a bottle of Trump Vodka. Trump University is something entirely different, and it’s not over yet; questions are now being raised about a investigation the Texas Attorney General’s office undertook of Trump University, which concluded the new comer was cheating Texans away from large sums of money; the investigation was dropped by then-AG Greg Abbott, who later got $35,000 in contributions from Trump and is actually don’t worry the state’s governor.
Watch Jake Tapper ask Trump 23 follow-up questions about whether Trump continues to be racist about a estimate

CNN reporter Jake Tapper asked Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump if his judge attack was racist, then carried out 23 times.

A lot of presidential candidates have possessed shady doings in their pasts, but how do you give thought to anything at all that compares to Trump University? A party’s nominee allegedly managing a con not just on unsuspecting victims, but on victims specifically chosen for his or her vulnerability and desperation? It’s obvious why you can’t find any Republicans who’ll defend it, in a time when ordinarily you can find a partisan hack to justify absolutely anything their party’s leader is practicing or has done.
Then you had Trump’s continued attacks toward the judge presiding over that fraud case. It’s unusual just enough for a presidential candidate to become publicly attacking a judge inside a case he’s involved in, but what’s most appalling is the blatant bigotry along at the basis of Trump’s criticisms. First Trump could possibly feel that together with being biased against him the judge is “Mexican” (which happens to be false — the judge was born in Indiana). Now Trump says that because of the fact that the judge is “of Mexican heritage” he should really be faraway from the reality. “I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of concern,” he avers. Given the rest of the demographic groups Trump has insulted and offended, the body’s conclusion would seem to get that as a general rule only white male judges are fit to preside over Trump’s many, many lawsuits.

Put together this sequence of developments coming one after another, and I suspect that many journalists are deciding the fact that the technique to cover Trump is just to accomplish it as honestly and assiduously as possible, which might itself be something almost revolutionary. In the event the tone of his coverage up until has been “Wow, is the election crazy or what!” it very well could become much more serious — as is completely appropriate given that we’re choosing a professional to make sure that the most powerful position on earth.
The switch may be seen in ways both government and commercial. Yesterday, in a story about a number of Trump’s remarks, CNN ran a chyron reading “Trump: I never said Japan needs to have nukes (he did)”. The type of on-the-fly fact-checking is unusual, but Trump necessitates it because he tells this sort of spectacularly good deal of lies. He also enables it because those lies are often repeated and obvious. So we’re embarking to see those corrections appear directly in the too much to handle stories: the reporter relays what Trump said, and notes immediately that it’s false.
Trump himself probably finds such treatment grossly unfair, since to that person “unfair” coverage is anything else that doesn’t portray him in the most glowing terms. However it is perhaps ironic that after all this time of thinking about to handle this most unusual candidate, Trump has been shown the press that this most effective way to do it would be to cover him like every candidate really should be covered. This means not simply planting a camera at his rallies and marveling at how nuts almost everything is, but doing the work to completely vet his background, correcting his lies as swiftly and surely as they simply can, exploring exactly what a Trump presidency would positively mean, and customarily doing their jobs without letting him intimidate them.

Author Resource Box:

Donald Trump Points Out Black Rally Attendee, Tells Crowd To ‘Look Within African-American’

Interesting choice of words….

Kenneth Dantzler-Corbin's avatarThe Dantzler Report!

Donald Trump singled out a black supporter for a rally Friday, telling the group to “look his African-American.”


Speaking at an event in Redding, California, Trump condemned the violent protests that had broken out after his campaign rally in San Jose the night before and called the protesters “thugs.” Trump claimed he always tells his supporters to “be very gentle” with demonstrators — despite having frequently encouraged violence at his campaign events.
Trump then started a story about a rally in Tucson, Arizona, the place where a black Trump supporter punched a protester wearing a KKK hood.
“We experienced a case where we had an African-American guy who was a big fan of mine. Great fan. Great guy. The truth is I wish to get to know what’s happening with him,” Trump said, before pointing to a man inside the crowd. “Look at my African-American over here. Examine him. Are you…

View original post 142 more words

Donald Trump singled out a black supporter for a rally Friday, telling the group to “look his African-American.”


Speaking at an event in Redding, California, Trump condemned the violent protests that had broken out after his campaign rally in San Jose the night before and called the protesters “thugs.” Trump claimed he always tells his supporters to “be very gentle” with demonstrators — despite having frequently encouraged violence at his campaign events.
Trump then started a story about a rally in Tucson, Arizona, the place where a black Trump supporter punched a protester wearing a KKK hood.
“We experienced a case where we had an African-American guy who was a big fan of mine. Great fan. Great guy. The truth is I wish to get to know what’s happening with him,” Trump said, before pointing to a man inside the crowd. “Look at my African-American over here. Examine him. Are you the most? You are aware what I’m talking about? OK.”
“Everyone thought the African-American was against me,” he was quoted saying in regards to the incident with the Tucson rally. “And it was actually the flip side it.”

Trump continued by insinuating that the media has hidden his black supporters.
“We have tremendous African-American support,” he said. “The reason is I’m intending to bring jobs to our country. However when these sleazy people, these dishonest individuals who never show the crowds … And showed that event, it made it appear like the white guy was on my side.”
The presumptive GOP nominee has previously claimed he’ll prosper with black voters in November’s general election. However, a Quinnipiac Poll released today found Hillary Clinton winning 93 percent of a given black vote inside a potential match-up having the business mogul.
Author Resource Box:

 

Why the new Trump University documents give Democrats exactly the weapon meets the necessary needs

Trump U in the news

Kenneth Dantzler-Corbin's avatarThe Dantzler Report!

trump-hands-headThreemonthsago, MarcoRubiotriedtoutilizestoryofTrumpUniversitytotrimdowndownhisprimaryrival. “He’shopingtogivetotheAmericanpeoplewhathedidtothoseinthisparticularcourse,” Rubiosaidwithinadebate, settingabouttoturnhowitisintoyourmetaphorforthecompleteTrumpcandidacy. “He’sattemptingtoconpeopleintogivinghimtheirvoteidenticaltoheconnedthesepeopleintogivinghimtheirmoney.” Butasyoucanpossiblyrecall, itdidn’tworkTrumpkeptrolling, rightoverRubioandrighttotheRepublicannomination.
Howeverasyoureadthis, there’sprobablyafocusgroupinprogresssomewhere, inwhichundecidedvotersareshowndocumentsfromtheoriginialandTrumpUniversitylawsuitandprizedtheirreactionwhileDemocraticpollstersandmediaconsultantswatch

View original post 824 more words

Why the new Trump University documents give Democrats exactly the weapon meets the necessary needs

trump-hands-head

Three months ago, Marco Rubio tried to utilize story of Trump University to trim down down his primary rival. “He’s hoping to give to the American people what he did to those in this particular course,” Rubio said within a debate, setting about to turn how it is into your metaphor for the complete Trump candidacy. “He’s attempting to con people into giving him their vote identical to he conned these people into giving him their money.” But as you can possibly recall, it didn’t work Trump kept rolling, right over Rubio and right to the Republican nomination.
However as you read this, there’s probably a focus group in progress somewhere, in which undecided voters are shown documents from the originial and Trump University lawsuit and prized their reaction while Democratic pollsters and media consultants watch eagerly from behind one-way glass, convinced this is the attack which Trump cannot recover. And they might not be wrong.
What changed? The vague and somewhat abstract became concrete, by using documents typically from class-action lawsuit against Trump, in which former marks pardon me, students of Trump U are suing the Republican standard-bearer for fraud. Now that your fax have been publicly released, instead of general characterizations of what happened there, we’ve former employees testifying on how these were instructed to encourage the students to reach the limit on their cards, how they ordered students’ desperation (“is it a single parent of three children that may need money for food?”) being a tool to manipulate them into making ever-larger purchases of a given supposedly life-changing seminars, or the way Trump U salesman was reprimanded after he failed to push a struggling couple to subscribe a $35,000 package because he knew they couldn’t afford it (unfortunately to them, another salesman stepped in and closed the sale).
Any political consultant can tell you that if you want to say your opponent lied or call him a hypocrite, it’s much more effective if by chance you have got his actual words and it’s more appropriate if they’re on tape. The better concrete the evidence, the harder it is to pay no attention to or explain away. That’s what these Trump University documents do: not just recast this specific tale, but allow Democrats to make it a metaphor for Trump’s candidacy, really as Rubio tried without success to perform.
Trump’s wealth has represented numerous factors to voters until the now. To lots of people of his supporters, his plane and resorts and spectacularly gold-plated apartment (done within a method we might call Late Russian Mobster) represent success, proof of Trump’s competence and skill. To lots of people others, his wealth represents Trump’s shallow and classless venality. Except for the most part, until recently finally it was essentially harmless and amusing. That’s as opposed into the last person the Republicans nominated for president, who appeared to actually be apologizing for their wealth the single last thing Trump will ever do.
Democrats successfully convinced voters that Mitt Romney was obviously a heartless corporate raider who may step over his own mother to help make another million. They had several grounds on which in order to make that case, but none was as powerful as the stories of people that were released using a company Romney’s Bain Capital had bought. In a single devastating super PAC ad, a worker in an Indiana factory told how he and his awesome coworkers were instructed to create stage within their plant; the stage was then mounted by executives who told the gathered workers which the plant was closing and they were all going to lose their jobs. “Seems that whenever we built that stage, it was actually like building my own coffin,” said a male in the ad.
But Trump’s wealth had never appeared to come at anyone’s expense. Sure, you might think Trump Tower serves as a monument to ’80s garishness, but no one’s pushed to purchase a place to rent there. Trump Steaks may well have been a joke, but at worst you are possibly one of the tiny number of people who bought some on a holiday to Sharper Image, ate them, and chose not to really become a repeat customer. Victims were few and far between.
That is actually, until Trump University. Now Democrats can say that just not only is Trump a fraud, he’s a con artist who destroys people’s lives as a way to buy himself a new hair weave. That recasts Trump’s wealth, that have always been his primary qualification for office. The absurd notion that is President Donald Trump rests on the notion that being a successful businessman, he is very good at get things done and create things work. It’s surprisingly hard to believe if you really associate him less with titans of industry and a lot more using the guys running three-card-monte games within the shadow of 1 of his buildings.
All that isn’t to claim that the emerging attack on Trump U is guaranteed to work. Even if Democrats decide to allow it to be the centerpiece of their own campaign against Trump, it’ll be only one piece of an incredibly complicated puzzle. But considering that they usually have a vivid, concrete method to make the case, its probabilities of success are very high.

Author Resource Box:

Trump is under fire about Trump University

A judge, called a “hater” by Donald Trump for his handling of a lawsuit pertaining to the businessman’s Trump University real estate school, has unsealed documents associated with…

Source: Trump is under fire about Trump University

Trump is under fire about Trump University

A judge, called a “hater” by Donald Trump for his handling of a lawsuit pertaining to the businessman’s Trump University real estate school, has unsealed documents associated with the way it is.

Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump holds a rally with supporters in San Diego, California, U.S. May 27, 2016. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee for any Nov. 8 election, is fighting a lawsuit that accuses his school venture of misleading lots of people who paid as much as $35,000 for seminars to know about the billionaire’s real estate investment strategies.

In an order signed on Friday, U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel said that materials, including Trump University procedures on dealing with students together with media, should be unsealed.

He noted they had recently been published because of the media organization Politico and that a magistrate judge described them previously as “routine” and “commonplace.”

At a rally in north park on Friday, Trump criticized Curiel for his handling associated with Trump University case.

“We have a judge that is a hater of Donald Trump. A hater. He is a hater,” Trump said.

“We’re in the front of a really hostile judge. The judge was appointed by Barack Obama,” Trump said, adding he believed Curiel was Mexican.

Curiel is an American who was simply born in East Chicago, Indiana, and graduated from the Indiana University School of Law.

Legal scholars said Trump could face consequences for slamming the judge, although many speculated that Curiel was unlikely to sanction him formally.

“Mr. Trump’s conduct could possibly be at the mercy of sanction for indirect criminal contempt of court,” said Charles Geyh, a legal ethics expert at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law.

“He has got impugned the honesty associated with the judge in a pending case, and contains done this within the context of a political rally that seems calculated to intimidate by inciting anger among his supporters,” he said.

Arthur Hellman, a specialist on federal courts and judicial ethics at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, said the judge was in a challenging position.

“He can’t respond directly. He’s not expected to talk out of court about proceedings before him. Judges have gotten into trouble defending themselves from attacks. The judge’s hands are actually tied,” he said.

Trump has drawn criticism for his comments about immigrants from Mexico, a few of whom he has said were criminals and rapists.

He’s got proposed building a wall across the U.S. border with Mexico to prevent illegal immigration and requiring Mexico to pay for it.

Hispanics are a vital voting bloc in U.S. presidential elections.

A week ago, Trump knocked one of several highest-profile Hispanic ladies in the Republican Party, criticizing New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez on her behalf handling associated with the state’s economy.

Her office said his criticisms are not substantive. Martinez continues to be touted as a possible vice presidential pick for a Republican ticket.

Resource

Trumps take advantage of 911 money for small businesses

Trump take money from small business

Kenneth Dantzler-Corbin's avatarThe Dantzler Report!

CLAIM: Donald Trump improperly received $150,000 in federal aid earmarked for small enterprises damaged through 9/11 attacks, even though his business was neither small nor damaged among the list of attacks.

trump-hands-head
MOSTLY FALSE
WHAT’S TRUE: Company owned or operated by Donald Trump was entitled to $150,000 in federal aid to businesses affected with all the 9/11 attacks.
WHAT IS FALSE: The grant money was not specifically earmarked for smaller businesses nor was it improperly accessed by Trump. Trump’s businesses failed to lie or mislead federal agencies to in order to qualify underneath the respect of programs, which did not require businesses to get sustained physical harm to remain eligible to get the funds. Trump’s business also was not the greatest large firm to qualify under criteria used by the agency tasked with distributing the grant money.
ORIGIN:In late May 2016 a variety of sites published articles reporting that presumptive Republican…

View original post 81 more words

"Know your plan and purpose for life it will bring you success"