Category Archives: Healthy eating

Could thousands of cancer diagnoses be tied to a poor diet?

Ones diet could have more impact on ones cancer risk than you might think, new research has discovered.

An estimated 80,110 new cancer cases among the adults 20 and older within the United States in 2015 were attributable only to eating an unhealthy diet, in line with the study, published within the JNCI Cancer Spectrum on Wednesday.

Photo by Public Domain Pictures on Pexels.com

The researchers evaluated seven dietary elements: a low intake of vegetables, fruits, whole grains and dairy products and a higher intake of processed meats, red meats and sugary drinks, such as for instance soda.

Low whole-grain consumption was associated with the largest cancer burden into the US, followed closely by low dairy intake, high processed-meat consumption, low vegetable and fruit intake, high red-meat intake and significant intake of sugar-sweetened beverages.

The research included data on the dietary consumption of adults into the United States between 2013 and 2016, which came from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, in addition to data on national cancer incidence in 2015 through the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The researchers used a comparative risk evaluation model, which included estimating the number of cancer cases related to poor diet and helped evaluate just how much diet may be the cause within the US cancer burden. Those estimations were made using diet-cancer associations found in separate studies.

Previous studies provide intense evidence that a top consumption of processed meat escalates the risk of colorectal cancer and a low usage of whole grain products decreases the danger of colorectal cancer. However, our study quantified the amount and percentage of the latest cancer cases which are attributable to poor diet at the national level.

The researchers found that colon and rectal cancers had the best number and proportion of diet-related cases, at 38.3%.

Once the findings were looked over by diet, low use of whole grain products and dairy products and eating lots of processed meats contributed into the highest cancer burden.

Also, men 45 to 64 years of age and ethnic minorities, including blacks and Hispanics, had the highest proportion of diet-associated cancer burden compared with other groups, the researchers found.

Ultra-processed foods linked to increased cancer risk
The study had some limitations, including that the information could not shed light on what the association between diet and cancer risk may change as an individual ages.

Additionally, more research is needed to see whether an equivalent association would emerge for other years and time periods within the United States.

On the whole, diet is amongst the few modifiable risk factors for cancer prevention. These findings underscore the needs for reducing cancer burden and disparities within the US by enhancing the intake of key food groups and nutrients.

Avoid these ‘ultraprocessed’ foods and you might live longer
Ultraprocessed foods occupy an increasing area of the world’s diet. A 2016 study found that 60% of the calories into the average American diet originate from this sort of food, and a 2017 study found that they make up 50 % of the Canadian diet. They make up a lot more than 50% associated with the UK diet, and much more of this establishing world is just starting to eat in this manner.

Yet you may protect yourself from cancer by avoiding ultraprocessed foods and alternatively selecting organic foods, studies have shown.

Individuals who frequently eat organic foods lowered their overall danger of developing cancer, in accordance with a report published just last year into the medical journal JAMA Internal Medicine. Specifically, those who primarily ate organic foods were almost certainly going to ward off non-Hodgkin lymphoma and postmenopausal breast cancer than those who rarely or never ate organic foods.

Additionally, in accordance with a report published in the same journal in February, we face a 14% greater risk of early death with each 10% increase in the total amount of ultraprocessed foods we readily eat.

Could avocados and almonds be vegan?

Commercial farming of those vegetables, at the least in certain areas of the world, often involves migratory beekeeping. In places such as California, you can find not enough local bees or any other pollinating insects to pollinate the huge almond orchards. Bee hives are transported regarding the back of large trucks between farms — they might go from almond orchards in one part of the US then on to avocado orchards an additional, and soon after to sunflower fields over time for summer.

Vegans avoid animal products. For strict vegans what this means is avoiding honey because of the exploitation of bees. That appears to imply that vegans also needs to avoid vegetables like avocados that involve exploiting bees inside their production.

The revelation that avocados may possibly not be “vegan-friendly” could seem to be a reductio ad absurdum for the ethical vegan argument. Some people might point out this and declare that those who are vegan but still consume avocados (or almonds and the like) are hypocrites. Alternatively, this sort of news might lead some individuals to throw up their hands in the impossibility of living a really vegan diet, and thus to stop.

However, one initial defence for vegans is the fact that this might be only a problem for several vegetables which are produced commercially on a big scale and that are determined by migratory beekeeping. In places for instance the UK, this practice continues to be uncommon. Locally sourced butternut squash would probably be fine (although you could never guarantee a bee kept in a hive had not pollinated a crop), while avocados and almonds (including most almond milk) sourced from California could be a challenge.

Another answer might depend on someone’s view about the moral status of insects. Commercial beekeeping may injure or kill bees. Transporting bees to pollinate crops seems to negatively affect their own health and lifespan. But some may question whether bees are capable of suffering in the same manner as animals, while some may wonder whether bees are self-aware — whether they have a desire to carry on to reside. When they do not, some philosophers argue that they would not be harmed by being killed.

Processed Foods may lead to gaining weight

Consuming ultra-processed sustenance instead of eating minimally-processed foods may lead to weight gain in some people, higher risks of cancer, and premature death.

 A team of experts from the National Institute of Health examined the effects of eating more ultra-process foods compared to minimally processed foods.

Preceding investigations that examined how ultra-processed foods can drive weight gain. Investigators have depended on on the capability of contributors to remember the food they consumed, which is frequently problematic for the majority persons.

By carefully obeying the diet of contributors, the new research assisted researchers to differentiate the outcomes of both types of food as it occurred in real-time.

Read More at : https://www.techtimes.com/articles/243454/20190519/processed-foods-can-make-you-gain-weight-study.htm

Could drinking 100 per cent natural fruit juices increase your risk of an early death?

Doctors and dieticians have advised patients to eat whole fruits, instead of consuming them in the form of juices and smoothies. Despondently, due to the fast-paced lives, this process leaves no room for peeling, cutting and eating fruits, fresh fruit juices which often seems like a delicious and easy way to stay healthy. However, science does not quite approve of the consumption of fruit juices. While most of us recognize that soda and other sugary drinks ought to be evaded at all costs, 100 percent fruit juices are not accurately good for your health either.

The research

The groundbreaking research connects the ingesting of sugar-sweetened beverages and 100 percent natural fruit juices to a premature passing away. The research consisted of 13,400 adults with an average age of 64 and almost 71 percent of the contributors who were weighty or corpulent.

The researchers asked volunteers were asked about their daily consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks, counting fruit juices. Over the course of 6 years (on an average), 1,168 of the participants died.

After evaluating their health records, it was obtained that an additional 354 ml serving of sugary beverages per day was related an 11 percent higher all-cause mortality danger, while each additional 354 ml serving of fruit juice was linked with a whopping 24 percent higher all-cause death risk.

These outcomes propose higher ingesting of sugary beverages, counting fruit juice, is connected with amplified death. Sugary beverages were defined as SSBs of sodas, soft beverages, or fruit-flavored beverages and naturally sweet 100% fruit juices.

Those who drank the most sugar-sweetened beverages, counting 100 percent fruit juice had higher probabilities of dying throughout the course of the study when equated with those who imbibed the smallest of these.

Broccoli sprout extract help treat schizophrenia

The current schizophrenia treatments rely on antipsychotic drugs that come with unwanted side effects. However, new research has found that a chemical called sulforaphane could reduce and even prevent symptoms of the condition.

close up of broccoli

Broccoli sprouts had a chemical that could alleviate schizophrenia.

Many people with schizophrenia experience hallucinations and delusions that can significantly impact their everyday life.

Broccoli sprouts contain a chemical that may alleviate schizophrenia.
Many people with schizophrenia experience hallucinations and delusions that can significantly impact their everyday life.

However, those with the condition may find it hard to seek treatment.

Based on the World Health Organization (WHO), schizophrenia affects more than 21 million people worldwide, but more than half of these people do not receive proper care.

Medications are a mutual practice of treatment, but they do not function for everybody with the ailment. They also arrive with a long list of side effects, extending from cardiovascular concerns to what is generally known as the heebie-jeebies.

Is calories, carbs, fat, fiber the unraveling problem linked between breast cancer and diet?

A Low-Fat diet assists in easing the possibility of death from breast cancer. Though, dozens of news organizations, such as NPR, reported on innovative new research that discovered that a low-fat diet helped women minimize their danger of dying from breast cancer. However, the results stem through the federally funded Women’s Health Initiative; a significant, long-term, nationwide health study introduced back in 1993. At the time the analysis began, women who signed up were inside their 50s, 60s, and 70s.

The effectiveness of this research is twofold: its size, nearly 50,000 women in all, and its long-term follow-up, nearly 20 years. During the research, some ladies in both groups were identified as having breast cancer, but those that had altered their diets had a 21 percent lower danger of dying through the disease.

As soon as the females had been counseled to produce a lower-fat diet by eating more fresh fruits, veggies, and whole grain products, these people were doing significantly more than lowering fat; these were improving dietary fiber, nutrients, and vitamins.

The women into the study who modified their diets did lose weight, an average of about 3 percent of the total body weight. It is possible that this explains the decreased risk of death from breast cancer documented when you look at the study. It is evident that obesity is a risk factor for cancer of the breast, so shedding weight may be an approach to reduce risk.

Did you know that genetically engineered immune cells fight off deadly virus in mice?

Researchers may have demonstrated a novel way to safeguard us from some of the world’s deadliest viruses. By genetically engineering immune cells, which will make more effective antibodies, they usually have defended mice from a potentially lethal lung virus. Precisely the same strategy can work in humans against diseases, which are why there are not any vaccines. Though, vaccines typically contain a disabled microbial invader or shards of their molecules. They stimulate immune cells known as B cells to crank out antibodies that target the pathogen. Not every person who receives a vaccine gains protection, however. Some patients’ antibodies are not up to snuff, for example. Moreover, researchers have not been able to develop vaccines against some microbes, such for example HIV additionally the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), that causes lung infections mainly in children and folks with impaired immune systems.

To find out whether transplanting the modified cells could prevent infections, the scientists injected the genetically engineered B cells or control cells into mice and then exposed the animals to RSV. Five days later, the lungs of this control mice teemed utilizing the virus. However, the lungs of mice that had received the engineered cells contained almost no RSV, the researchers report today in Science Immunology. As soon as the researchers injected the modified B cells into mice with defective immune systems—a common problem in bone marrow recipients, who will be prone to RSV—the rodents could fight off the virus 82 days later.

Could a healthy diet cuts risk of dying from breast cancer in older women?

A well-balanced, low-fat diet significantly lowers the risk of dying from breast cancer in postmenopausal women, based on new long-term data from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Dietary Modification trial.

The balanced diet designed is one of moderation, and after nearly 20 years of follow-up, the health benefits are still accruing.

The findings revealed during a press briefing May 15 ahead of a presentation Jun 2 during the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting.

This research makes clear there are not any down-sides, only up-sides to a more healthy diet, plus it adds to a growing level of studies showing similar positive effects across cancer types.

The trial enrolled 48,835 postmenopausal women without any previous breast cancer and with dietary fat accounting for at the very least 32 per cent of total daily calories. From 1993 to 1998, the women were randomly allocated to a usual-diet comparison group or a dietary intervention group that aimed to cut back fat intake to 20 per cent of daily calories and increase consumption of vegetables, fruit and grains.

Women into the balanced, low-fat diet group stuck with the diet for roughly 8.5 years. Many of them increased their intake of fruits, vegetables and grains and cut their daily fat intake to 25 per cent or less, although most did not reach the 20 per cent goal.

An overall total of 3,374 women developed breast cancer between 1993 and 2013. The low-fat diet failed to significantly reduce women’s risk of developing cancer of the breast – still, women within the dietary intervention group experienced a range of short- and long-term health advantages in comparison with women within the normal diet group. Specifically, that they had a 21 per cent lower danger of death from breast cancer and a 15 per cent lower chance of death from any cause through the follow through period.

Postmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome (increased blood pressure, high blood glucose, excess excessive fat around the waist and abnormal cholesterol or triglyceride levels) were particularly prone to benefit from the dietary intervention.

Find out more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/world/healthy-diet-cuts-risk-of-dying-from-breast-cancer-in-older-women-11540664
664

Ultra-Processed Foods Drive Weight Gain

Over 70 years, ultra-processed foods appear to dominate the United States diet plan. These foods come from cheap industrial ingredients. The cheap foods are concocted to be super delicious and commonly elevated in fat, sugar, and salt.

The growth of ultra-processed foods has overlapped with increasing proportions of obesity, leading many to mistrust they have performed a big role in our developing waistlines. Is it something about the highly processed character of these foods itself that pushes persons to overindulge? New inquiry discoveries the response is yes.

The study, led by investigators at the National Institutes of Health, is the first randomized, controlled trial to display that consuming a diet made up of ultra-processed foods really pushes people to overindulge and gain weight related with a diet made up of whole or slightly processed foods. Study contributors to the ultra-processed diet consumed an average of 508 calories more per day and gained an average of 2 pounds over a two-week period. People on the organic diet, in the meantime, ended up losing about 2 pounds on average over a two-week timeline.

Keto Dieting

The “keto” diet is any exceptionally low- or no-carbohydrate diet that moves the human body into a state of ketosis.

Ketosis occurs when people eat a reduced- or no-carb diet plan and molecules also known as ketones build up in their bloodstream.

Low carb levels result in blood sugar levels to drop in addition to body begins breaking down fat to use as energy.

Ketosis is in fact a mild type of ketoacidosis. Ketoacidosis mostly affects people who have type 1 diabetes. In reality, it will be the leading reason for death of people who have diabetes that are under 24 years of age.

However, many experts say ketosis itself just isn’t necessarily harmful.

Some studies Trusted Source, in fact, suggest that a ketogenic diet is safe for significantly overweight or obese people.

However, other clinical reviews point out that patients on low-carbohydrate diets regain a number of their lost weight within a year.