Tag Archives: Politics

Is Nancy Pelosi the master of shade?

President Donald Trump — so far — happens to be reluctant to provide Nancy Pelosi any nickname.

Five months after Pelosi got Trump to own the shutdown during an Oval Office conference, their communications along with his frustrations, led Trump to walk off of his job, in the middle of your day, on the White House Lawn.

She then agreed to pray for him. Ardently. Moreover, perhaps a family group involvement is in order? She mused that possibly the President, unlike her, maybe was not in control of his very own White House. She challenged his work moral principle. Pelosi waved off one of his top aides, requiring that she only deals with Trump.

For the reason that it is what Pelosi does, moreover, Trump, who respects (fears?) Pelosi because of her power, her wealth along with her family lineage, is her most reliable target.

She doles out shade, the kind which takes a while to show itself. Pelosi goes on detours and tangents — in some instances about Jefferson and Roosevelt and Eisenhower together with Erie Canal — after which it becomes apparent that the path leads right to Shadytown. All the while, there was a sort of detached bemusement — a businesslike aloofness towards the whole affair.

While Trump fumes, Pelosi gently waves an admirer. It is not that she is mad. Just disappointed.

These are classic Jedi-mind tricks, perfected by a woman who had five kids in six years and five kids in six years.

She has got a means of delivering her message towards the intended without rubbing their face inside it — without directly telling them why she is so disappointed. Moreover, for Trump, Pelosi, in most of her dispassionate, unemotional glory, eventually ends up being a giant warning sign, a perfect foil. Though, she embodies what he has got never had — a check up on his behavior.

Can you believe that Russian documents reveal the desire to sow racial discord — and violence — in the U.S.?

Russians who were connected to interference into the 2016 U.S. election discussed ambitious intends to stoke unrest as well as violence within the U.S. as recently as 2018, based on documents reviewed by NBC News.

The documents — communications between associates of Yevgeny Prigozhin, a Kremlin-linked oligarch indicted by special counsel Robert Mueller for previous influence operations resistant to the U.S. — laid out an innovative new plot to govern and radicalize African-Americans. The plans show that Prigozhin’s circle has sought to exploit racial tensions well beyond Russia’s social media marketing and misinformation efforts linked with the 2016 election.

The documents were obtained through the Dossier Center, a London-based investigative project funded by Russian opposition figure Mikhail Khodorkovsky. NBC News has not yet independently verified the materials, but forensic analysis by the Dossier Center appeared to substantiate the communications.

One document said that President Donald Trump’s election had “deepened conflicts in American society” and suggested that, if successful, the influence project would “undermine the country’s territorial integrity and military and economic potential.”

The revelations come as U.S. intelligence agencies have warned of probable Russian meddling within the 2020 election.

The documents contained proposals for all ways to further exacerbate racial discord in the future, including a suggestion to recruit African-Americans and transport them to camps in Africa “for combat prep and trained in sabotage.” Those recruits would then be sent back to America to foment violence and strive to establish a pan-African state in the Southern U.S., including South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana.

There’s no indication that the plan — which is light on details — was ever put into action, however it offers a fresh exemplory instance of the mindset around Russian efforts to sow discord when you look at the U.S.

The blueprint, entitled “Development Strategy of a Pan-African State on U.S. Territory,” floated the thought of enlisting poor, formerly incarcerated African-Americans “who have experience in organized crime groups” as well as people in “radical black movements for participation in civil disobedience actions.”

The target was to “destabilize the internal situation within the U.S.”

Faculty Address At Taylor University Walk Out Of Mike Pence’s Commencement

Frustrated by their school’s choice of commencement exercise presenter, a large number of Taylor University graduates and faculty walked out on Vice President Mike Pence in protestation in the Christian college’s commencement exercise ceremony Saturday.

The demonstration emerged following Taylor students began an on-line petition calling regarding the school to bar Pence from giving the address, pointing out issues so it might be construed as an endorsement of President Donald Trump’s guidelines.

Read more at: https://thegailygrind.com/2019/05/18/graduates-faculty-walk-out-of-pences-commencement-address-at-taylor-university/?fbclid=IwAR3KfSLvqu_YKtno639FGB3AjWPpnx_qr4R2I-Kegv3Tg3kr2RAP-YH_C6s

Did Rep Justin Amash say,”Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct?”

Rep. Justin Amash has become the very first Republican that is congressional to for the president’s impeachment based on special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.

The special counsel did not establish that the Trump campaign or anybody associated with it plotted or synchronized with Russia. He additionally provided no conclusion on the matter of feasible obstruction of justice, choosing instead to go out of that decision for Congress.

Amash stated that the 448-page report “identifies multiple examples” of the president’s conduct pleasing all of the aspects of blockage of justice.

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has stopped short of calling for impeachment but left the doorway open to the chance, though Democratic leaders are reluctant to introduce a divisive effort that would likely end with all the president’s acquittal within the GOP-led Senate.

Trump administration wants to cut $7.1 billion to Education Department

The Trump administration is wanting to diminish the Education Department’s funding by $7.1 billion in comparison to what it had been given last year, as an element of next year’s proposed budget.

The budget proposal recommends eliminating 29 programs, including after-school and summer time programs for students in high-poverty areas, among other activities.

The budget proposal is unlikely to pass through through Congress – especially with Democrats in charge of your house, however, it really is a glimpse to the Trump administration’s priorities going in to the next fiscal 12 months.

In a statement , Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said the proposed cuts reveal “commitment to investing taxpayer dollars sensibly and efficiently by consolidating or eliminating duplicative and inadequate federal programs.”

The history of the Immigration Act in the United States

The Immigration Act of 1882 was a United States federal law signed by President Chester A. Arthur on August 3, 1882. It imposed a head tax on noncitizens for the United States who stumbled on American ports and restricted certain classes of people from immigrating to America, including criminals, the insane, or “any person unable to look after him or herself.” The act created what is thought to be the first federal immigration bureaucracy and laid the building blocks for more regulations on immigration, including the Immigration Act of 1891.

Ahead of the passage through of the Immigration Act of 1882, the United States Congress had passed two significant acts regarding immigration. The first was the Page Act of 1875, which restricted the immigration of forced laborers originating from Asia. This had an important impact on the immigration of Asian indentured workers and women; specifically women presumed to be immigrating to the office as prostitutes. The 2nd was the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. This act halted all legal immigration of Chinese laborers and it is considered by many to function as the first major exclusionary immigration restriction on a complete nationality enacted because of the United States. While both these acts resulted from public concern about the Chinese influence into the labor market while the economy, they even based on simple prejudice together with public perception among these immigrants’ inability to assimilate into American culture.

Although the Immigration Act of 1882 shared the principle of immigration restriction utilizing the two aforementioned acts, it had been different in a fundamental way. Unlike the Chinese Exclusion act, the Immigration Act of 1882 will never limit all immigration from a certain country or region. Certain European immigrants were considered extremely desirable, so to limit by region would deny desirable immigrants as well. Instead, to limit immigration predicated on excluding certain forms of people who were deemed “undesirable”, there necessary to be a bit of legislation effective at adhering to an even more comprehensive, exclusionary approach that would be administered through a federal government agency with federal policy.

Vice President Joseph Biden, 20th cousin 1x removed

Vice President Joseph Biden is my 20th cousin 1 x removed. The ancestor who connect us together is Maud Marshall (1192 – 1248), my 19th great grandmother.

Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. is an American politician who served as the 47th vice president associated with the United States from 2009 to 2017. Biden also represented Delaware when you look at the U.S. Senate from 1973 to 2009. A member associated with the Democratic Party, Biden is an applicant for President into the 2020 election.

Biden was born in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and lived there for 10 years before moving along with his family to Delaware. He became an attorney in 1969 and was elected into the New Castle County Council in 1970. He had been first elected towards the U.S. Senate in 1972, as he became the sixth-youngest senator in American history. Biden was re-elected into the upper house of Congress six times and was the fourth most senior senator as he resigned to assume the vice presidency in ’09. Biden was a long-time member and former chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. He opposed the Gulf War in 1991, but advocated U.S. and NATO intervention into the Bosnian War in 1994 and 1995. He voted in favor of the resolution authorizing the Iraq War in 2002 but opposed the surge of U.S. troops in 2007. He has got also served as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, dealing with issues associated with drug policy, crime prevention, and civil liberties. Biden led the efforts to pass through the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, and the Violence Against Women Act. He also chaired the Judiciary Committee through the contentious U.S. Supreme Court nominations of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas. Biden unsuccessfully sought the Democratic presidential nomination in 1988 plus in 2008.

My genealogical chart shows the ancestor that Joseph Biden that connect us as family:

Joseph Robinett Biden Jr.
20th cousin 1x removed

Joseph Robinett Robinette Sr Biden Sr. (1915 – 2002)
Father of Joseph Robinett Biden Jr.

Mary Elizabeth Robbinette (1894 – 1943)
Mother of Joseph Robinett Robinette Sr Biden Sr.

George Tanner ROBINETTE (1756 – 1831)
Father of Mary Elizabeth Robbinette

Jesse ROBINETTE (1776 – 1832)
Father of George Tanner ROBINETTE

Moses J George Robinett (1819 – 1903)
Father of Jesse ROBINETTE

George H. Robinette (1844 – 1914)
Father of Moses J George Robinett

Nathan Robinette (1717 – 1803)
Father of George H. Robinette

Mary Taylor (1674 – 1747)
Mother of Nathan Robinette

William Taylor (1640 – 1683)
Father of Mary Taylor

William Taylor , Col. (1605 – 1687)
Father of William Taylor

Thomas Taylor , Cpt.
Father of William Taylor , Col.

Thomas Taylor (1548 – 1588)
Father of Thomas Taylor , Cpt.

Margaret Tyndal (1510 – )
Mother of Thomas Taylor

William Tyndal (1440 – 1488) Father of Margaret Tyndal

Thomas Tyndal (1411 – 1448)
Father of William Tyndal

Helena de Felbrigge (1390 – 1426)
Mother of Thomas Tyndal

Simon de Felbrigge (1367 – 1431)
Father of Helena de Felbrigge

Roger de Felbrigge (1342 – 1368)
Father of Simon de Felbrigge

Simon le Bigod (1281 – 1349)
Father of Roger de Felbrigge

Roger le Bigod (1242 – 1295)
Father of Simon le Bigod

Simon le Bigod (1218 – 1242)
Father of Roger le Bigod

Maud Marshall (1192 – 1248)
Mother of Simon le Bigod

Zachary Taylor the 12th President of the United States,10th cousin 3x removed

President Zachary Taylor is my 10th cousin 3x removed. The ancestor on my genealogical chart who connects us together is Edward NEVILLE, Baron Bergavenny (1412 – 1476), my 12th great grandfather.

Zachary Taylor was born on November 24, 1784 and died on July 9, 1850. He was the 12th president associated with the United States, serving from March 1849 until his death in July 1850. Taylor previously was a lifetime career officer in the United States Army, rose to your rank of major general and became a national hero due to his victories when you look at the Mexican–American War. As a result, he won election towards the White House despite his vague political beliefs. His top priority as president was preserving the Union, but he died sixteen months into his term, prior to making any progress regarding the status of slavery, which was in fact inflaming tensions in Congress.

My genealogical chart reveals that ancestor we both share:

President Zachary Taylor (1784 – 1850)
10th cousin 3x removed

Sarah Dabney Strother
Mother of President Zachary Taylor

William Strother
Father of Sarah Dabney Strother

Francis Thornton Strother (1700 – 1751)
Father of William Strother

William B. Strother III (1665 – 1726)
Father of Francis Thornton Strother

Eleanor Conyers (1570 – 1611)
Mother of William B. Strother III

Sir John Conyers (1550 – 1610)
Father of Eleanor Conyers

Anne Dawney (1515 – )
Mother of Sir John Conyers

Dorothy Neville (1496 – 1532)
Mother of Anne Dawney

Richard Neville (1468 – 1530)
Father of Dorothy Neville

Henry Neville, Sir (1437 – 1469)
Father of Richard Neville

Edward NEVILLE, Baron Bergavenny (1412 – 1476)
Father of Henry Neville, Sir

Does the Presidents behavior gives reason to impeach?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stated on Thursday that she is convinced President Donald Trump every day presents reasons about impeachment meanwhile quarreling that she does not want to impeach, although she would not exclude the likelihood.

Pelosi thinks the President daily provides reasons meant for impeachment when it comes to his obstruction of justice. She by no means state, blanketly, she is not responding to any subpoenas Pelosi explained.

The comments were comparable to remarks Pelosi made recently recommending that the President, only by his conduct, is successfully creating an advantage of his impeachment.

Although Pelosi also stated at the function, “Now she no longer wants to impeach,” attaching, she wants the President to give them the facts before having to waste too much money on attorneys.

Trepidation among House Democrats and the Trump administration boomed to epic proportions furthermore this week when the White House declined demand for files from the House Judiciary Committee in its comprehensive investigation into conceivable impediment of justice.

House Democrats claim that they possess a constitutional obligation to practice oversight of the President, even though Trump and his allies dispute that the investigations motivated by Democrats are politically enthusiastic and engineered to focus on the President for partisan motives. However, Pelosi rejected to state if she supports imposing penalties on persons who ditch congressional subpoenas, on the other hand, reiterated that “absolutely nothing is off the table” when asked about this likelihood throughout the press meeting.

Fight Draconian Anti-Abortion Laws

Anti-abortion activists and legislators appear to be against Roe v. Wade, and they are getting close to eliminating this case. All-male legislators in Alabama Senate voted to highlight this draconian abortion ban, without exceptions for rape or incest. The governor of this state is republican Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey.

Ivey signs the bill. This bill will become the most restrictive abortion law in the country. The next states to pass such a bill are Georgia and Ohio which bans abortions after six weeks.

Last year 15 states adopted 27 new constraints on abortion and family planning. The definitive objective of many of the designers of these regulations, and the abortion prohibitions passed in Ohio, Georgia and Alabama, is to manipulate state legislation to get Roe v. Wade overturned by the Supreme Court, which is now slanted in conservatives’ support.

To be clear, this is not an aim that left-wingers have understood, but one that legislators have come right out and identified on the record.

Outlawing abortion is about controlling women’s liberty, independence, mobility, sexuality and self-determination. Regulations like the ones passed in Georgia, Mississippi and Alabama ― laws that totally disregard things that essentially diminish abortions, like all-inclusive sex education, available birth control, and better social services for parents and children ― are, quite factually, violence on females’ lives.