Tag Archives: government

Culture, Ethics, government, human rights, Politics, Social Justice, White House

What do you think of Alabama Senator Tuberville’s comparison of descendants of slaves to criminals?

Leave a comment

Saturday, during a rally for former President Donald Trump, Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Alabama, equated descendants of enslaved people to criminals, generating severe outrage for pushing a racist narrative. Before a predominantly white audience in Minden, Nevada, Tuberville denounced Democrats as “pro-crime.” “They desire crime because they wish to seize what you have.” They seek to control your possessions. “They seek compensation because they believe the perpetrators are entitled to it,” Tuberville added. “Bull****! That is not obliged to them.” In a press release, NAACP President Derrick Johnson described Tuberville’s remarks as “flat out racist, ignorant, and utterly sickening.”

A Call For Reparations: How America Might Narrow The Racial Wealth Gap

America is notorious for racial inequality. A Call for Reparations: How the United States Could Reduce the Racial Wealth Gap
Johnson continued, “His words promote a centuries-old lie about Black people that throughout history has resulted in the most dangerous policies and violent attacks on our community.” The office of Tuberville did not reply promptly to NPR’s request for comment. As a means of addressing the enduring impacts of slavery, support for reparations for black Americans whose ancestors were slaves has increased throughout time. More than 170 Democratic co-sponsors backed a measure to examine reparations for slavery last spring. A House committee voted to advance the proposal, but the entire House of Representatives has not yet examined it. As a means of addressing the enduring impacts of slavery, support for reparations for black Americans whose ancestors were slaves has increased throughout time.

Bibliography

Kim, Juliana. “Alabama Sen. Tuberville Equates Descendants of Enslaved People to Criminals : NPR.” NPR.org, October 10, 2022. https://www.npr.org/2022/10/10/1127872936/senator-tuberville-racist-reparations-stereotype?fbclid=IwAR3H5GpsKM5XxUnWyy1jHr7hJk5xF7vs7YRvdYYE5wHIJyCiDv9QbC2bPTg.

Culture, equal rights, Ethics, government, human rights, Politics, Social Justice

Did you know that most Americans don’t support politicians punishing firms for their views, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds?

Leave a comment

A Reuters/Ipsos survey revealed that a bipartisan majority of US voters reject governments penalizing firms for their social viewpoints, signaling a chilly response for campaigns like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ against Walt Disney Co.

Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando, Fla. on Feb. 24, 2022.John Raoux / AP file

However, a two-day survey concluded on Thursday found that 62% of Americans — including 68% of Democrats and 55% of Republicans — said they were less inclined to support a politician who favors suing firms for their political beliefs. As a result, DeSantis signed a measure this week depriving Disney of self-governing power over its Orlando-area parks in punishment for the company’s objection to a new Florida legislation restricting the teaching of LGBTQ matters in schools. Though it was an effort by DeSantis, a rising star in the Republican Party, to enhance his conservative credentials as a cultural fighter in advance of a potential challenge for the Republican presidential nomination in 2024.

Behavioral Science, Culture, Ethics, human rights, mental health, Philosophy and Religion, Religion, Social Justice, Stigma

Pope Francis’ call for legal acceptance of same-sex relationships

Leave a comment

Pope Francis’ call for legal acceptance of #same-sex relationships has raised both hope and worries among #LGBTQ Catholics.

“What we need certainly to create is a civil union law,” the pontiff said in “Francesco,” an upcoming documentary from Russian American filmmaker Evgeny Afineevsky. “That way, these are typically legally covered. I stood up for that.”

Image: Pope Francis delivers "Urbi et Orbi" Christmas Day message from main balcony of St. Peter's Basilica

The remarks are a departure from earlier church messaging. Inside the last book, “Memory and Identity,” Pope John Paul II suggested same-sex marriage was “part of an innovative new ideology of evil.”

In 2003, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who later became Pope Benedict XVI, wrote that respect for gays and lesbians “cannot lead in any solution to the approval of homosexual behavior or even to legal recognition of homosexual unions.”

“Legal recognition of homosexual unions or placing them on a single level as marriage will mean not only the approval of deviant behavior,” Ratzinger wrote, “but would also obscure basic values which fit in with the normal inheritance of humanity.” It has not been long ago that African Americans and Whites could intermarry. At that time, some Whites believed that Blacks would destroy the white race. Now, we see that the Pope is making a bold statement. Why are some people concerned about others’ marriage when their marriage ends in divorce because of an unfaithful partner who may be practicing deviant behavior with an individual of a different gender or that same-gender, which leads to adultery? Why get in other people’s business if your business is not perfect? Who gives a person the right to tell others who to love when your Christian bible say, “save yourself”? What would G-d say about one’s prejudice toward a sister or brother who may not share the same beliefs? Are we better than the other person because we know scriptures and many times misquote them without knowing the historial context that time in which scripture was written? If we take the scriptures literally, should we be stoning people?There are gay people in our families, pulpits, professional life who are doctors, lawyers, teachers, nurses, firefighter, ministers, essential workers, and in the church serving in every ministry whether known or unkown. There are just questions to think about.

Reference
Pope’s civil union remarks raise hopes, doubts for gay Catholics. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/pope-s-civil-union-remarks-raise-hopes-doubts-gay-catholics-n1244337?cid=referral_taboolafeed

government, Politics, White House

Can you believe the House panel subpoenaed Gates and Michael Flynn?

Leave a comment

The House Intelligence Committee on Thursday sent a subpoenas to two pastTrump officials who pleaded guilty and cooperated concerning special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

The intelligence panel reported it had subpoenaed past Trump campaign deputy Rick Gates and past national security adviser Michael Flynn. The two pleaded guilty in the special counsel’s investigation before cooperating when using the investigation, and their affidavit is documented in Mueller’s report.


House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff’s decision to subpoena overall the Mueller witnesses illustrate a new facet in the Democrats’ investigations into President Donald Trump, as it is the very first subpoenas issued to targets related to the Mueller probe.


Schiff threatens to subpoena FBI director. The House Judiciary and Intelligence committees are operating on dual tracks inside their examinations relating to the Mueller investigation: House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler has issued subpoenas to former White House officials who figured prominently inside the special counsel’s obstruction investigation, while Schiff is now subpoenaed officials cited within the special counsel’s investigation into Russian election interference.

“To be a part of our oversight work, the property Intelligence Committee is constant to evaluate the deep counterintelligence concerns raised in Special Counsel Mueller’s report, so that requires speaking directly with the fact witnesses,” Schiff, a Democrat from California, said in a statement. “Both Michael Flynn and Rick Gates were critical eyewitnesses for Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation, but until now have refused to cooperate fully with Congress.”


The subpoenas to Flynn and Gates request they can give documents later this month and appear just before the panel on July 10. The House Intelligence Committee had interviewed former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen when you prepared the motorcycle for winter its sweeping probe that Schiff launched not too long ago, that is examining Russian election interference along with Trump’s finances and possible foreign influence.

House approves a resolution to enforce McGahn, Barr subpoenas during the court proceeding. Schiff had put off other interviews, including with Trump business associate Felix Sater, as the committee dedicated to having the Mueller report. However, Thursday’s subpoenas undoubtedly are a sign of the fact that the committee is returning to its interviews as Democrats proceed to highlight and publicize what has been uncovered within the Mueller investigation.

Within the Judiciary Committee’s investigation, the White House has directed those subpoenaed do not provide documents regarding their time inside the Trump administration. The White House directed former White House counsel Don McGahn not to testify under subpoena, while former White House communications director Hope Hicks is appearing later this month behind closed doors but may not answer there will be instances when inquiries are asked that the court will not allow due to claims of executive privilege.

It is unclear how Flynn and Gates will respond to Schiff’s subpoenas. Both of them are still under cooperating agreements when using the Justice Department and also have still to be sentenced after their guilty pleas. Flynn retained a new lawyer now that promoted conspiracy theories about Mueller’s team.

The letter to Flynn includes a note about his cooperation when using the Justice Department, which prompted the special counsel to recommend very little jail time, arguing which the cooperation should consist of Congress.

“Even though the committee knows that your cooperation agreement having the Doj only demands that you testify for the department, the committee is disappointed which you do not view your cooperation more broadly as an obligation to assist us, not merely the Department of Justice,” Schiff wrote.

Reference
House Intelligence Committee urges no pardon for Edward …. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/house-intelligence-committe-urges-no-pardon-for-edward-snowden/2016/09/15/f647a6f4-7b86-11e6-beac-57a4a412e93a_story.html
Former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks …. https://www.westernjournal.com/former-white-house-communications-director-hope-hicks-lands-new-gig-fox/

Ethics, History, Politics

Do you believe impeachment would send Trump and his ego into a tailspin or should Democrats just do it?

Leave a comment

If there is something we understand about President Donald Trump, it is that he is an unapologetic egomaniac that is obsessed with general public viewpoint. He retweets good approval reviews while labeling any polls showing negative ratings as “fake.” Throughout decades in public areas life, Trump has repeatedly lied about his wide range. The entirety of their life is choreographed appearing vibrant, and powerful. Trump’s narcissism, nonetheless, reveals a fragility that congressional Democrats is smart to exploit as they continue steadily to debate whether they should initiate impeachment procedures resistant to the president.

For this point, Democrats have now been trapped in a field of their very own generating. Regarding the one hand, they issue strong statements claiming that the president “is perhaps not over the law.” In the other, Democratic leaders like House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., state that “you cannot impeach a president if American people do not help it.”

By wanting to contain it both methods, congressional leaders only have telegraphed to Trump that they do not have the stomach for the impeachment fight. Trump indeed interprets their hesitancy as weakness and feels empowered because of it.

Reference

Democrats must impeach Trump to show presidents can’t …. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/06/11/impeach-donald-trump-show-presidents-cant-commit-crimes-column/1340404001/

Culture, Ethics, Politics

Trump administration wants to cut $7.1 billion to Education Department

Leave a comment

The Trump administration is wanting to diminish the Education Department’s funding by $7.1 billion in comparison to what it had been given last year, as an element of next year’s proposed budget.

The budget proposal recommends eliminating 29 programs, including after-school and summer time programs for students in high-poverty areas, among other activities.

The budget proposal is unlikely to pass through through Congress – especially with Democrats in charge of your house, however, it really is a glimpse to the Trump administration’s priorities going in to the next fiscal 12 months.

In a statement , Education Secretary Betsy DeVos said the proposed cuts reveal “commitment to investing taxpayer dollars sensibly and efficiently by consolidating or eliminating duplicative and inadequate federal programs.”