Category Archives: Social Justice

This also talks about the issues that are current and what matters to all human beings who want to be a change agent in the world

Ethics, Politics, Social Justice

Trumps take advantage of 911 money for small businesses

1 Comment

CLAIM: Donald Trump improperly received $150,000 in federal aid earmarked for small enterprises damaged through 9/11 attacks, even though his business was neither small nor damaged among the list of attacks.

trump-hands-head
MOSTLY FALSE
WHAT’S TRUE: Company owned or operated by Donald Trump was entitled to $150,000 in federal aid to businesses affected with all the 9/11 attacks.
WHAT IS FALSE: The grant money was not specifically earmarked for smaller businesses nor was it improperly accessed by Trump. Trump’s businesses failed to lie or mislead federal agencies to in order to qualify underneath the respect of programs, which did not require businesses to get sustained physical harm to remain eligible to get the funds. Trump’s business also was not the greatest large firm to qualify under criteria used by the agency tasked with distributing the grant money.
ORIGIN:In late May 2016 a variety of sites published articles reporting that presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump had improperly received $150,000 in federal aid earmarked for smaller businesses affected by the September 11 attacks and get a property he owned or maintained at 40 Wall Street in New York city. Many social websites shares misleadingly described the reports as “just in” or “breaking,” suggesting that rumors of Trump’s purported fiscal impropriety in terms of 9/11 funds had only recently arrived at light, and the underlying articles mischaracterized the particulars of a given controversy.

Resource

Social Justice

Trump involved in crafting controversial Trump University ads, executive testified

Leave a comment

Donald Trump was personally tangled up in devising the online marketing strategy for Trump University

Source: Trump involved in crafting controversial Trump University ads, executive testified

Politics, Social Justice

Trump involved in crafting controversial Trump University ads, executive testified

1 Comment

Donald Trump was personally tangled up in devising the online marketing strategy for Trump University, even vetting potential ads, based on newly disclosed sworn testimony through the company’s top executive taken included in a continuing lawsuit.

Into the testimony, section of a trove of records made public as a result of a federal judge’s Friday order, the executive said that the real estate mogul was associated with discussions and signed off “any time we had a fresh ad.”

“Mr. Trump understandably is protective of his brand name and very protective of his image and how he’s portrayed,” Michael Sexton, Trump University’s president, said within the 2012 deposition. “And he desired to see how his brand name and image were portrayed in Trump University marketing materials. And he had very good and substantive input as well.”

The order Friday from U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel came as a result to a request because of the Washington Post, which argued that the general public had a pastime in mastering about a business run by a potential president. Lawyers for Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, opposed the release, arguing that the records contained trade secrets.

The records released Tuesday include documents from employees who described Trump University as a scam, as well as internal company manuals, called “playbooks,” which show that instructors were advised to aggressively steer prospective customers toward the most expensive courses. The playbooks advised staff members to gather “personalized information” about participants to help close sales. An example: “Are they a single parent of three children that may need money for food?”

Trump University’s marketing tactics have now been in the center of a case by which former students allege they certainly were defrauded because of the company. Among all of their allegations: which they were misled by ads featuring Trump claiming that he had been overseeing the curriculum and therefore the faculty would be “hand-picked by me.”
Trump has rejected the fraud allegations and has said the organization provided a valuable service. A Trump lawyer, Jill A. Martin, predicted Tuesday that the company will prevail once the case goes to trial, that is anticipated to happen in late November. Most of the newly unsealed evidence, she said, “demonstrates the advanced level of satisfaction from students, and that Trump University taught valuable real estate information.”

Tuesday’s release included an amount of glowing reviews from customers. “Trump University is some of the best money I ever invested!” one customer wrote.

Trump’s exact role in the for-profit educational venture happens to be an important facet of contention. Previously reported testimony from the lawsuit suggested that Trump was not deeply involved in the substance of the courses.

Sexton testified in an independent deposition that Trump would not personally select instructors for the marquee sessions. And Trump, in a sworn deposition, was unable to recall the names of key faculty members.

Even so, according to the newly disclosed testimony from Sexton, the organization was desperate to leverage Trump’s growing celebrity status stemming from his hit reality-television show, “The Apprentice.” Sexton claimed that, throughout the area of the year when the NBC show was airing, ads typically carried slogans associated with this system, such as: “I want you to become my Apprentice.”

These Republicans refuse to vote for Donald Trump

Sexton testified that Trump’s role as “chairman” of Trump University was purposely highlighted in advertising, as was a picture associated with the mogul’s signature.

But he said one potential ad theme built around the idea of teaching students to “invest like a billionaire” was rejected.

“It wasn’t available to people,” Sexton said. “People didn’t necessarily walk around attempting to be a billionaire. They’d be very very happy to be a millionaire. . . . I believe our feeling was that it was almost overwhelming, daunting, you understand; that is not likely to happen.”

The records were unsealed as Trump continued to attack Curiel, the judge overseeing the scenario. He has got previously said Curiel, that is Hispanic, might be biased due to Trump’s proposal for a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. Friday, Trump described the Indiana-born jurist as “Mexican.”

In an appearance Tuesday, Trump said Curiel was “very bad.” Asked why he would risk antagonizing the person presiding over the litigation, he responded: “Because I don’t care. We have a judge who’s very, very unfair. He knows he’s unfair. And I’ll win the Trump University case.”
Trump University was started in 2004 as a small business offering courses in entre­pre­neur­ship under the Trump brand. Trump gave his consent and became a 93 percent owner of this enterprise, based on Sexton’s newly unsealed deposition.

Trump was the centerpiece for the company’s advertising pitches. “Trump University will provide the experience, knowledge and wisdom of Donald Trump himself,” according to marketing materials distributed to potential prospects. In a promotional video, Trump declared that “at Trump University, we teach success. That’s what it’s all about — success.” He described the faculty as “the best of the best,” with instructors “handpicked by me.”

Aside from the class-action lawsuits being considered by Curiel, Trump University faces an independent $40 million fraud case in New York City, filed by state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. A brand new York judge recently ruled that the outcome is going to trial; Trump has appealed the ruling, an ongoing process that is expected to last several months.

The documents unsealed by the federal judge when you look at the class-action case include a contract with a Trump University speaker showing that a percentage regarding the speaker’s compensation was predicated on signing up seminar participants to purchase more Trump University products. Whilst in training, speakers were anticipated to hit a certain sales rate to be retained because of the program, in accordance with the contract.

One former Trump University staffer, Ronald Schnackenberg, wrote in a formal statement unsealed Tuesday that he quit this system in 2007 after working there for less than a year, deciding that it was participating in “misleading, fraudulent and dishonest” practices. His statement said he had been reprimanded by Trump University for not working harder to offer a $35,000 program to a couple who could not afford it and might have needed to use disability pay and that loan applied for against equity within their apartment to fund it.

He said another salesperson talked the couple into spending money on the seminar after he refused. “I happened to be disgusted by this conduct and made a decision to resign,” he wrote.
Schnackenberg wrote that he never saw Trump in seven months, in which he concluded that the program had not been designed to teach about real estate but instead so it “preyed upon older people and uneducated to split up them from their money.”

The newly disclosed documents also include a number of annual behind-the-scenes strategy manuals intended to guide Trump University employees.

Known as “playbooks,” the documents instruct staff when you look at the minutiae of setting ready to go free introductory courses, but emphasize that participants ought to be pressed to join up for additional, pricey classes.

Politics, Social Justice

Trump’s national movement

Leave a comment

Donald Trump calls his presidential campaign a mass movement, but he must show they can coax enough support from voters who twice delivered the White House to Barack Obama.

The billionaire businessman depended almost exclusively on conservative and GOP-leaning whites — a lot of them men — to secure the . Now he must look forward to a wider, more diverse voting population in his likely general election matchup with Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton.

His capacity to seize on marginal shifts during the electorate may see whether they can pull off a victory once unthinkable. Trump’s task is crucial to flipping back in the GOP column several of the most contested states that Obama won twice.

This challenge could very well be most evident in Florida, a culturally, racially and ideologically varied state where Obama defeated Republican Mitt Romney four years ago by less than 75,000 votes away from more than 8.4 million cast.

This means small shifts anywhere in the electorate could make a difference — from turnout changes among white small-town and rural Republicans or urban, nonwhite Democrats to partisans, embittered by contentious nominating bouts, choosing third-party candidates or declining to vote after all; of course Trump can’t close the gaps in Florida, he has got little shot at winning key Rust Belt and Great Lakes states where Obama’s advantages were greater.

“We still elect presidents utilising the Electoral College … dependent on states which are made up of diverse electorates,” cautions GOP pollster Whit Ayres. “There aren’t enough angry white individuals to create a big part within the new America of 2016, (and) running up your numbers with white males in Mississippi does not get you yet another electoral vote than Mitt Romney.”

Certainly one of Trump’s vanquished primary rivals, Sen. Marco Rubio, told reporters this week Trump can win Florida, that has gone because of the winner in most presidential contest since 1996, provided that they can “continue to become Donald.” That brash outsider pitch has sewn up support from white men like Jack Oliver, a 66-year-old construction worker from West Palm Beach and 84-year-old Frank Papa, a retired grocery manager from Clearwater.

The online world of Things (IoT) has got the potential to resolve our biggest global challenges and bring people everywhere an even better standard of living.
Oliver cites Trump’s hard line on immigration and calls him a leader “who will finally give a damn about people just like me.” Papa, an innovative new Jersey native, says Trump “speaks my language, talks and thinks anything like me.”

But Trump must expand his reach. “If he can’t unify Republicans, there in fact isn’t enough votes for him in order to make up elsewhere,” said Steve Schale, who ran Obama’s 2008 campaign in Florida. He said Florida elections have already been close for a long time, noting 41 million combined presidential votes have now been cast since 1992, with less than 131,000 votes separating the combined totals of Democratic and Republican nominees.

Trump gives lip service into the electorate’s diversity, suggesting “the Mexican people” will “vote for me personally like crazy” and therefore he can win 25 % of African-Americans. The best wide range of African-Americans won by any GOP nominee since 1980 is mostly about 12 percent. He said recently he could lure “40 percent” of voters backing Clinton’s primary opponent, Bernie Sanders.

Some nonwhite Floridians mock Trump’s claims about his or her own appeal.

“I haven’t heard any one of my (black) friends say they’ll vote for Trump,” said Tanisha Winns, 39, a black Democrat in Lakeland, located along central Florida’s Interstate 4 corridor that twice helped give Republican George W. Bush the statewide victory before swinging in Obama’s favor. “If anything, I’m hearing my white friends say they won’t,” Winns added.

For the time being, Florida polls suggest Trump and Clinton are running about even, with about 15 percent undecided. But you will find variables which should give Trump pause.

In 2012, nonwhites accounted for nearly a 3rd of most votes cast in Florida, in comparison to 28 percent nationwide. But population growth, driven by Hispanics, suggests both numbers could possibly be higher come November.

Obama beat Romney among Florida’s black voters, with 95 percent. The president won Hispanics by a 60-40 margin, closer than his 71-27 advantage nationally, with numerous of Florida’s conservative Cuban-American voters accounting for any difference. Those numbers still left Romney too reliant on whites. He managed 61 percent of Florida’s white vote — much better than his 59 percent nationally — but he needed seriously to get nearer to 63 percent to win the Sunshine State’s 29 electoral votes.
Demographers and pollsters from both parties say Trump likely would need to push to the mid- to high-60s with whites — an even no candidate has reached since Ronald Reagan’s 1984 landslide — to have the possibility nationally. That’s even more daunting considering an AP-GfK poll, taken in April, that found two out of three white women view Trump negatively.

One of them are Republicans the nominee absolutely must get.

In Clearwater, Republican Barbie Sugas says she’s always voted for any GOP nominee, however the 47-year-old surgical technician said she’s “kind of leaning toward Clinton” because she does not “trust Trump” with international affairs.

To be certain, Clinton also must shore up her Democratic base, still divided with Sanders within the race. Jennifer Perelman, a Sanders supporter, says she won’t back the previous secretary of state. But she won’t vote for Trump either. Her plan: to vote for Sanders as a write-in candidate.

Ayres, the Republican pollster, affirmed that it is “not impossible” for Trump to fashion a fantastic coalition. But, he says, “You’re basically arguing that somehow, a consistent 20-year-plus demographic trend is merely planning to magically stop.”

Resource

Social Justice

Trump keeps giving Republicans major cause for alarm

Leave a comment

Donald Trump keeps giving Republicans major cause for alarm — because he’s still attacking them

Source: Trump keeps giving Republicans major cause for alarm

Politics, Social Justice

Trumps supports sentenced for violence

1 Comment

Discrimination1Boston brothers accused in urinating on and beating a good homeless Mexican man and then telling police “Donald Trump was right: All these illegals need to be deported, ” were sentenced to prison on Monday, prosecutors said.

Scott Leader, 38, and then Steve Leader, 30, had recently pleaded guilty to indictments charging them with causing physical injury while committing a good civil rights violation, and also assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, among other charges.

Scott Leader was sentenced to three years in prison and Steve Leader was sentenced to 1-1/2 years, the Suffolk County Area Attorney’s Office said within a statement. The pair will also be on probation for three years after their prison sentences end.

The Commanders were arrested on Sept. 19 on suspicion concerning beating Rodriguez, 58 then, because he slept in a subway stop. The men told law enforcement many people targeted their victim general health thought he was an against the law immigrant.

The victim, Guillermo Rodriguez, said in a declaration that he was in fact a permanent resident.

“I came to this country many years ago and worked hard in the farm fields to provide produce to people here. I actually became a permanent resident of this country years ago, although if I had been undocumented I still would not have deserved to be beaten this way, ” Rodriguez said in a prepared statement read by Assistant District Attorney Nicole Rimar before the sentencing.

The pair punched and kicked Rodriguez, and one of the men repeatedly struck him with a metal pole, before the two walked off laughing, prosecutors said.

According to a police report, they told officers, “Donald Trump was right: All these illegals need to be deported. ”

Prosecutors said Scott Leader told arresting officers that he believed the attack was justified because the victim was homeless and Mexican. The pair allegedly threatened cops while in custody also.

Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for that U. S. presidential competition, has verbal on migrants, proposing to create a wall on the U. S. -Mexico promising and border, if elected, to deport the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the usa already.

Overcome, a genuine estate reality and developer tv personality, initially described that attack while an end result of passionate sights on migrants but later called that “terrible. ”

and then telling police “Donald Trump was right: All these illegals need to be deported, ” were sentenced to prison on Monday, prosecutors said.

Scott Leader, 38, and then Steve Leader, 30, had recently pleaded guilty to indictments charging them with causing physical injury while committing a good civil rights violation, and also assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, among other charges.

Scott Leader was sentenced to three years in prison and Steve Leader was sentenced to 1-1/2 years, the Suffolk County Area Attorney’s Office said within a statement. The pair will also be on probation for three years after their prison sentences end.

The Commanders were arrested on Sept. 19 on suspicion concerning beating Rodriguez, 58 then, because he slept in a subway stop. The men told law enforcement many people targeted their victim general health thought he was an against the law immigrant.

The victim, Guillermo Rodriguez, said in a declaration that he was in fact a permanent resident.

“I came to this country many years ago and worked hard in the farm fields to provide produce to people here. I actually became a permanent resident of this country years ago, although if I had been undocumented I still would not have deserved to be beaten this way, ” Rodriguez said in a prepared statement read by Assistant District Attorney Nicole Rimar before the sentencing.

The pair punched and kicked Rodriguez, and one of the men repeatedly struck him with a metal pole, before the two walked off laughing, prosecutors said.

According to a police report, they told officers, “Donald Trump was right: All these illegals need to be deported. ”

Prosecutors said Scott Leader told arresting officers that he believed the attack was justified because the victim was homeless and Mexican. The pair allegedly threatened cops while in custody also.

Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for that U. S. presidential competition, has verbal on migrants, proposing to create a wall on the U. S. -Mexico promising and border, if elected, to deport the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the USA already.

Overcome, a genuine estate reality and developer TV personality, initially described that attack while an end result of passionate sights on migrants but later called that “terrible. ”

Click on link for more information

Culture, Politics, Social Justice

Transgenders fight over bathroom rights

1 Comment

transgender-1The recent introduction of laws that regulate whether transgender people can use the facilities that align with their gender identities has brought the issue of bathroom sex segregation to the forefront of national conversations. Some have proposed that the solution may lie in gender-neutral facilities, while others worry in what the consequences may be. But , whilst attempts to prohibit gender intermingling in restrooms took on a new concentrate, the roots of the debate day back over a century.

Although first sex-segregated toilets had been established in Paris in the 1700s, regulations requiring that American men and women use individual restrooms got their begin in the late 1800s. The first regulation requiring distinct toilet facilities for men and women was passed in 1887, when Massachusetts needed the establishment of distinct privies in businesses. “Wherever male and female persons are employed in the same factory or workshop, a significant number of separate and distinct water-closets, earth-closets, or privies shall be provided for the use of each sex and should be plainly designated, ” the law reads. In the next line, mixed use of such facilities is prohibited. Over the course of the next three decades, nearly every state passed its own version of that law.

But the rules that govern who pees where in public spaces were not created due to physical differences among women and men that affect just how bathrooms are used. “You can think that it makes sense, that bathrooms are separated by sex because there are fundamental biological variations, ” says Terry Kogan, a statutory regulation professor at the University of Utah. “That’s completely wrong. ”

Kogan, who did extensive research on days gone by history of sex-segregation in public areas restrooms, tells TIME that the guidelines came into being as a total consequence of social anxieties about women’s locations in the world.

Social norms of the time dictated that the true residential was a woman’s place. As women entered the place of work even, often in the brand new factories which were being built at the time, there was a reluctance to integrate them fully into public life. Women, policymakers argued, were inherently weaker and still in need of protection from the harsh realities of the public sphere. Thus, separate facilities were introduced in nearly every aspect of society: women’s reading rooms were incorporated into public libraries; separate train cars were established for women, keeping them in the back to protect them in the event of a crash; and, with the introduction of indoor bathrooms which were along the way of replacing single-person outhouses after that, separate loos followed soon. The recommended layouts of bathrooms, says Kogan, were made to mimic the comforts of home-think chaise and curtains lounges.

“[Ladies’ rooms] had been used to create this shielded haven in this dangerous general public realm, ” says Kogan.

Today, despite the fact that society’s views on ladies have shifted largely, sex-segregated bathrooms remain the custom.

Why? Because major plumbing codes in the U. S. use a public building’s capacity to dictate how many restrooms should be built, and those codes specify that men and women’s facilities should be separate. The codes even mandate a minimum number of toilets and urinals per sex. Often , those formulas result in more facilities being made available for men than for females, despite famously lengthy lines for ladies’ rooms.

There were efforts to chip apart at the inequity facing the sexes in bathrooms-in 1987 California signed the Bathroom Equity Act, which stated fresh public projects had a need to include even more restrooms for females. Equivalent ordinances were used in metropolitan areas across the U. S., however in many places there exists a reluctance to neutralize bathrooms with regards to gender still.

As the debate over bathrooms offers shifted, a few of the arguments policymakers are using to guard the circumstances ring might ring familiar to those familiar with bathrooms’ history: the idea that separate facilities will protect women from harm remains. Two North Carolina lawmakers have said that eliminating separate bathrooms would “deny women their right to basic safety and privacy. ” Research does show that trans people may be at risk in bathroom situations-a 2013 survey by the Williams Institute found that 70% of trans people reported experiencing denial of access, verbal harassment or physical assault in an attempt to use the bathroom-but Kogan says the idea that all women are in increased danger in mixed or gender-neutral bathrooms doesn’t make sense, as predators “ aren’t waiting for permission to decorate like a woman to get into bathrooms. ”

For for information click on link

Ethics, Social Justice

How should you respond when a person blames God for not treating people with respect?

Leave a comment

scapegoat

In response to this article: When I read this article and thought another one. I thought God said love your neighbor. I believe Torah teaches us to love the stranger. It is strange when how we blame God for our wrong doing.

A South Carolina tow pickup truck driver said God told him to leave a handicapped Bernie Sanders ally stranded along the interstate.

Cassy McWade was involved in a car crash near Asheville, North Carolina, and her family members called their frequent mechanic to drive forty-five minutes north of his shop to take her wrecked auto back for auto repairs, reported WHNS-TV.
Ken Shupe, an owner of Shupee Max Towing, arrived about an hour in the future and began connecting McWade’s car about his truck — until he seen the Sanders plan sticker on her fender and the yard signal placed in her rear end window.

“He circles back and comes back and says, ‘I cannot tow you, ‘,i” McWade said. “My first instinct was there must be something wrong with all the car, and he says, ‘No, you’re a Bernie supporter. ’ And I was like, ‘Wait – really? ’ And he says, ‘Yes ma’am, ’ and walks away. ”

Shupe offered a supernatural explanation intended for his decision to leave the 25-year-old McWade, who is affected with arthritis and other health problems, alongside I-26.

“Something came over me personally, I think theGod told me, and He just said, ‘Get in the truck and leave,’” Shupe said. “And onceIgot in my pickup truck, you know, I was, therefore, proud, because We felt like I finally drew a collection in the sand and stood up for what I believed. ”
The Donald Trump ally then offered a far more earthly explanation intended for stranding the customer.

“Every business dealing in recent history with a socialist-minded person I have not become paid, ” Shupe said. “I personal this truck. This says, ‘Shupee, ’ not ‘freebie. ’ Every time I cope with these people I obtain ‘Berned’ with an ‘e’ – not a ‘u’. ”

McWade — who suffers from psoriatic arthritis, fibromyalgia, serious fatigue syndrome, and early-stage Crohn’s disease – is by law disabled and exhibits a handicapped placard on her rear-view hand mirror, but the mechanic explained he wasn’t mindful of her disability.

The woman said her spouse and children told Shupe regarding her health problems — but he explained it wouldn’t currently have mattered much, at any rate.

“Had she recently been disabled, would I’ve towed her car? No ma’am, ” Shupe said. “I would have pulled onward and sat at this time there with her to make certain she was fine until another wrecker service showed up to get her residence safely, but I just still would not have got towed her car. ”

“I uphold my decision, and I would do it again today if the opportunity offered itself, ” Shupe said.

The conservative​ Christian suggested he had a religious right to decline service to Sanders followers.

“I respect their very own beliefs, and I desire they respect my personal views, ” Shupe said.

McWade anxiously waited alone for another 50 percent hour, terrified that her Crohn’s disease would flare up, till another mechanic came, and she remains to be mystified by Shupe’s behavior.

“I, personally don’t believe that you don’t have to agree with anything just to become kind to one another, ” McWade said. “I was like, ‘What performed I do to you? ’ You know, I do consider I try to carry out right by persons. So I was genuinely offended, and I don’t really know what exactly he perceives I would have done to him directly since they can be a believer in Bernie. ”

Reference

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/05/trump-loving-tow-truck-driver-says-god-told-him-to-leave-bernie-sanders-supporter-stranded/

 

Culture, Politics, Social Justice

If Laws Are Set in Stone to Prevent Discrimination, Why Is Discrimination A Problem?

1 Comment

There are times when we think that we know the laws of the land, but do we really know them. I asked several people about their rights as a citizen. I was surprised that many individuals did not know their rights on jobs, are in the general public. When I was coming up in school, they taught us civics. It is a shame that many people do not know anything about civics. I asked another person did they know what civics was. The reply was, that they believe it was something that dealt with an alien take over of the world. I could not do nothing but laugh. Whatever alien that has taken over the world is from the planet ignoramus. Whatever happened, it erased knowledge of the past and is now on course of a scary future.gay2

Government and most states’ laws prohibit workplace race bigotry. In fact, Title VII — the federal law that forbids race discrimination — has recently been on the books for almost five decades now. However, apparently, some business employers have not gotten the message, because racial discrimination still happens more often than anyone wants to believe. Inside fact, it is the most common type of discrimination employees are accountable to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal agency that enforces Title VII.

Discrimination pays a very high price, both from the victims and from the companies that let it occur. Legal cases in recent times have proven this point, as large companies have experienced to pay for a huge amount to compensate the sufferers of competition discrimination and also to pay for their complicity in motivating or allowing a discriminatory atmosphere to prosper in the work environment.
An employer does race discrimination when it makes job judgments by nationality or when it retreats into seemingly unbiased job guidelines that disproportionately affect members of a particular contest.

Federal and most states’ laws and regulations prohibit race elegance in every aspect of employment, including employing, firing, promotions, compensation, job training, discipline, and termination.

Whenever an employer deliberately public out candidates or employees of a particular race for less favorable treatment, that is “disparate treatment” discrimination. However, the burden falls more heavily on employees of a particular race, that is “disparate impact” discrimination.

An employee who makes a disparate treatment claim alleges that he or she was handled differently than other employees who were in similar situations, due to employee’s competition. For example, a boss promotes only white employees to remedies positions, requires only job seekers of a certain race to submit to drug tests, or refuses to allow employees of certain races to deal with customers.

An employer that discriminates by physical characteristics associated with a particular race — such as hair texture or color, skin color, or facial features — also commits disparate treatment discrimination.
In a disparate impact legal action, the employee does not state that the employer purposely singled out employees of a particular race for bad treatment. Instead, the employee claims that the employer’s apparently neutral policy, rule, or practice has a disproportionately negative effect on users of a particular competition.

For example, a work policy requiring men to be clean-shaven may discriminate against African-American men, who are more likely to experience Pseudofolliculitis barbae (a painful skin condition triggered and exacerbated by shaving). A minimum height need may screen out excessive numbers of Asian Us and Latino job candidates. Analysis on hiring any applicant with an arrest or conviction record could disproportionately affect Latino and Black men.

If an employee implies that a particular policy has a disproportionate impact on members of the particular race, the employer can defend the plan by showing that there is a legitimate, important, job-related reason that necessitates the policy. For example, a height requirement might be justified if the employer can present that an employee must be at least a certain level to operate a particular type of machinery. However, an employer would be hard-pressed to justify a level requirement for a office position.

Harassment is also restricted. Harassment is any behavior based on a person’s actions that create an overwhelming, hostile, or offensive work environment or interferes with the individual’s works performance. Harassing might include racial slurs, jokes in regards to a particular ethnic group, physical acts of significance to a certain racial group.

Not every joke or inappropriate remark could be harassment, from a legal perspective. Place of work conduct must be unwelcome. Also it must be adequately severe or pervasive to change the conditions and conditions of the victim’s employment, to qualify as harassment. If the conduct is extreme, an individual incident might be enough to create a hostile environment. Physical assault, use of “the N-word, ” or hanging a noose, for example, might be so threatening and insulting as to be a nuisance. In the event the comments or functions are much less offensive, they will constitute harassment if they often happen enough to change the workplace surroundings.

Reference
What Is Race Discrimination? | Nolo.com. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/fighting-race-national-origin-discriminat

Culture, Philosophy and Religion, Politics, Social Justice

Watch out the Laws You Pass to Discriminate, Could these Laws Come Back to be Your Nightmare?

1 Comment

gay1As a blogger, I know that some may not share my thoughts and belief, however, I believe whether we agree with people or not, that we should have a love for our neighbor. I might not agree with my neighbor, but love is what brings us together. I overheard a conversation about the LGBT community, and while listening to the statements, I was applaud of what was coming out of Christians mouths. I was asked for my response; I said answered with a question, who in the shop has a perfect life? The shop went quiet. Who has committed sin in their mind while being angry with another person? How many have lusted after a woman? Still no answer. I responded, “Do not use God as a pon because God is not a Pon. Using the Bible to an AK47 to shoot people down does not give you that right to do unjust drive-by shootings with your lips. The same Bible used to enslave, was the same Bible used to kill millions of Jew, the same Bible used to oppress women was that same Bible that was used to deny rights to individuals who are different, and this was the same Bible used to write a constitution that excluded American Indians. Then I processed to say; there is a difference between reading the Bible and Studying the Bible. Studying means that you struggle with text and critically break that text down using the actual language, Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic. If one is not critically translating this text in its original form, I have questions. So, before quoting scripture make sure you know what you are saying because King James I was a homosexual and murderer.

Anti-gay religious community heads in Kokomo, Indiana, are getting down on their knees to pray that they will remain to enjoy the privilege to discriminate against
LGBT persons.

Kokomo’s Common Council voted 5-4 to approve an LGBT-inclusive nondiscrimination ordinance. The ordinance is a response to the Indiana Legislature’s failure to pass statewide law that would protect LGBT persons.

if the council approves the ordinance about second reading this evening, Kokomo will become one of regarding Indiana cities which may have approved LGBT protections.

About Thursday, 100 religious leaders opposed the ordinance gathered to pray that one council member will change their vote while on their knees inside Mount Pisgah Missionary Baptist Church.

However, organizers of the rally insisted they were acting out of love, not hate, and merely following “God’s word. ”

“It is never right for a man ever to be in a the female bathrooms, (or) locker rooms in Kokomo, Indiana, ” noted Eric Miller, the founder of Advance American, an Indianapolis-based anti-LGBT group.

Sadly, Tribune reporter Cara Ball did not bother to contact anyone who supports the ordinance for her story. She did nothing also to table the false, fear-mongering declaration that the ordinance can in some manner lead to possible sexual predators going into women’s restrooms and so preying on young girls.

Soon after Improve America’s Miller got dealt with the council carry on Mon, officials began offering inclination to speakers who are in the populous metropolis.

Some of those speakers were Aleczander Leader, an 18-year-old trans scholar at Kokomo High school graduation who have refuted the trans bathroom myth poignantly.

“I simply want to know why most people fellas think we are going to end up being potential predators, seeing as how the washroom can be our worst problem? ” Dean told that authority.

Mount Pisgah Pastor L. E. Anderson mentioned that he did not have a problem with LGBT people.

“God loves them as he loves us, ” Anderson told the Tribune. “It is not about LGBT. It is not about heterosexual. It is not about homosexual. It is about God’s word, and that trumps everything. ”

Councilman Stephen Whikehart, the author of the ordinance, told The New Civil Rights Movement he is confident it will pass on the second reading.
“The five of us our firm and adamant on the subject of creating a complete part of legislation that expands city rights protections to add: era, marital status, expert level, sexual orientation and male or female identity, ” this individual explained. If our community strategies to remain competitive nearby, and so nationally globally, we must entice and retain households, quality professionals, and hard-working people. Part of this kind of interest comes with creating a secure and so inclusive environment. We can not end up being influenced by misguided beliefs plus the propagation of dread.

Reference

Anti-Gay Religious Leaders Pray for Legal Right to .., http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/johnwright/anti_gay_christians_pray_for (accessed March 20, 2016).