Category Archives: Politics

Politics, Social Justice

14 Republican Excuses for Donald Trump’s Racism

1 Comment

Paul Ryan and Trump
Three months ago, David Duke, a white supremacist, declared his support for Donald Trump. Duke—who beat a field of Republicans, and all sorts of but one Democrat, when you look at the 1991 race for governor of Louisiana—praised Trump for saying “what I said almost 25 years back.”

When CNN’s Jake Tapper invited Trump to repudiate Duke together with KKK, Trump begged off, saying he needed more information. That prompted a rebuke from House Speaker Paul Ryan. “If a person would like to end up being the nominee associated with Republican Party, there can be no evasion and no games,” Ryan demanded. “They must reject any group or cause that is built on bigotry. This party does not prey on people’s prejudices.”

 

Nighty days later, Trump has been doing what Duke did, and much more. By tapping popular anger and exploiting anxiety about Cuban Americans, Mexican Americans, blacks, and Seventh-day Adventists, Trump has beaten a field of Republicans. If he can overcome one last Democratic candidate, he’ll be president for the United States. As opposed to turn far from Duke’s politics, Trump has moved closer to them. He’s got repeatedly accused Gonzalo Curiel, the federal judge that is hearing a fraud case against Trump University, of bias and unfitness because Curiel—who came to be in Indiana—is “Mexican.” This weekend, Trump added that a Muslim judge may be similarly not capable of treating him fairly. Meanwhile, Trump repeated his call for a ban on Muslims entering the United States.

Resource

 

Politics

The media have obtained a turning point in covering Donald Trump. He will possibly not survive it.

1 Comment

 

trump-hands-headRepublican presidential candidate Donald Trump warned reporters May 31, “I will continue to attack the press.” He slammed parts of society at large as “dishonest” on a news conference about donations he raised for veterans’ groups at Trump Tower in New York city.

The news media have learned in for a large amount of criticism in terms they’ve reported this election, that makes it very similar to most other election. But something could possibly have changed just in the past few days. I seem to not a clue how meaningful it definitely change into or how much time it will last.
But it’s fairly likely that when we recall in the sweep with this most unusual campaign, we’ll mark today as a significant turning point: the amount of time when journalists finally found out learn how to cover Donald Trump.
They didn’t do it by creating some hyped model of coverage, or distributing and assigning what they were taught in journalism school. They’re performing by rediscovering the fundamental values and norms that may presupposed to guide their profession. (As well as for the record, although I’m part of “the media” I’m speaking among the third person here because I’m an opinion writer, which certainly is mostly about the reporters whose job it can be to objectively relay the events of one’s day).
If this evolution in coverage takes hold, we can trace it into the combined effect of a number of events and developments happening in a quick time period. The initial was Trump’s press conference on Tuesday, the ostensible objective of that was to answer questions on a fund-raiser he kept in January to improve money for veterans’ groups. For the duration the press conference, Trump reluctantly visited his petulant, abusive worst, attacking reporters generally and any within the room. “The political press is among the most dishonest people that I’ve ever met,” he stated, saying to one journalist who had asked an absolutely reasonable question, “You’re a sleaze.” These sorts of criticisms aren’t new — anybody who has reported a Trump rally can inform you how Trump always tosses some insults for the press, at this stage his supporters spin and hurl their own abuse at those covering the event — but Trump seemed particularly angry and unsettled.
To discover the state of the hot tub press checked out that revealing event, it’s critical to comprehend what resulted in it. It happened due to the reason that the Post’s David Fahrenthold and some other reporters did what journalists are supposed to do. They raised queries about Trump’s fund-raiser, and the moment they didn’t get adequate answers, they investigated, gathered facts, and asked more questions.
Match the ‘nasty’ reporter who got Trump to offer $1 million

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said he raised $6 million for veterans groups with a January fund-raiser. The Washington Post’s accounting, in accordance to interviews with charities, only found $3.2 million in donations to veterans groups. Additionally, almost four months after promising one million dollars of his own money to veterans’ causes, Trump gone to fulfill that pledge.

Finally it was excellent work — time-consuming, difficult, and ultimately paying dividends publicly understanding. And Trump’s attack for them for doing their jobs directions those jobs are purported to be performed couldn’t have also been better devised to get most other journalist to desire to accomplish exactly the same. They’re as simple as anyone else: While you have a direct attack upon their professionalism, they’re prone to react by reaching back to their profession’s core values to indicate that they may perform them. Trump may have needed to intimidate them, but it’s likely to hold the opposite effect.
Exactly the same day just like the press conference, a trove of documents from Trump University was released when you prepared the motorcycle for winter a class-action lawsuit accusing Trump of fraud. Your fax revealed allegations as to just what a scam that enterprise was: high-pressure sales tactics, nothing resembling knowledge being imparted towards the “students,” people in financial trouble preyed upon and told to do so go overdrawn on their credit cards to offer for more seminars and courses. Several of Trump’s other schemes could possibly have been comical, but as far as we know nobody was victimized too terribly by buying a Trump Steak or maybe a bottle of Trump Vodka. Trump University is something entirely different, and it’s not over yet; questions are now being raised about a investigation the Texas Attorney General’s office undertook of Trump University, which concluded the new comer was cheating Texans away from large sums of money; the investigation was dropped by then-AG Greg Abbott, who later got $35,000 in contributions from Trump and is actually don’t worry the state’s governor.
Watch Jake Tapper ask Trump 23 follow-up questions about whether Trump continues to be racist about a estimate

CNN reporter Jake Tapper asked Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump if his judge attack was racist, then carried out 23 times.

A lot of presidential candidates have possessed shady doings in their pasts, but how do you give thought to anything at all that compares to Trump University? A party’s nominee allegedly managing a con not just on unsuspecting victims, but on victims specifically chosen for his or her vulnerability and desperation? It’s obvious why you can’t find any Republicans who’ll defend it, in a time when ordinarily you can find a partisan hack to justify absolutely anything their party’s leader is practicing or has done.
Then you had Trump’s continued attacks toward the judge presiding over that fraud case. It’s unusual just enough for a presidential candidate to become publicly attacking a judge inside a case he’s involved in, but what’s most appalling is the blatant bigotry along at the basis of Trump’s criticisms. First Trump could possibly feel that together with being biased against him the judge is “Mexican” (which happens to be false — the judge was born in Indiana). Now Trump says that because of the fact that the judge is “of Mexican heritage” he should really be faraway from the reality. “I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of concern,” he avers. Given the rest of the demographic groups Trump has insulted and offended, the body’s conclusion would seem to get that as a general rule only white male judges are fit to preside over Trump’s many, many lawsuits.

Put together this sequence of developments coming one after another, and I suspect that many journalists are deciding the fact that the technique to cover Trump is just to accomplish it as honestly and assiduously as possible, which might itself be something almost revolutionary. In the event the tone of his coverage up until has been “Wow, is the election crazy or what!” it very well could become much more serious — as is completely appropriate given that we’re choosing a professional to make sure that the most powerful position on earth.
The switch may be seen in ways both government and commercial. Yesterday, in a story about a number of Trump’s remarks, CNN ran a chyron reading “Trump: I never said Japan needs to have nukes (he did)”. The type of on-the-fly fact-checking is unusual, but Trump necessitates it because he tells this sort of spectacularly good deal of lies. He also enables it because those lies are often repeated and obvious. So we’re embarking to see those corrections appear directly in the too much to handle stories: the reporter relays what Trump said, and notes immediately that it’s false.
Trump himself probably finds such treatment grossly unfair, since to that person “unfair” coverage is anything else that doesn’t portray him in the most glowing terms. However it is perhaps ironic that after all this time of thinking about to handle this most unusual candidate, Trump has been shown the press that this most effective way to do it would be to cover him like every candidate really should be covered. This means not simply planting a camera at his rallies and marveling at how nuts almost everything is, but doing the work to completely vet his background, correcting his lies as swiftly and surely as they simply can, exploring exactly what a Trump presidency would positively mean, and customarily doing their jobs without letting him intimidate them.

Author Resource Box:

Politics

Donald Trump singled out a black supporter for a rally Friday, telling the group to “look his African-American.”

1 Comment


Speaking at an event in Redding, California, Trump condemned the violent protests that had broken out after his campaign rally in San Jose the night before and called the protesters “thugs.” Trump claimed he always tells his supporters to “be very gentle” with demonstrators — despite having frequently encouraged violence at his campaign events.
Trump then started a story about a rally in Tucson, Arizona, the place where a black Trump supporter punched a protester wearing a KKK hood.
“We experienced a case where we had an African-American guy who was a big fan of mine. Great fan. Great guy. The truth is I wish to get to know what’s happening with him,” Trump said, before pointing to a man inside the crowd. “Look at my African-American over here. Examine him. Are you the most? You are aware what I’m talking about? OK.”
“Everyone thought the African-American was against me,” he was quoted saying in regards to the incident with the Tucson rally. “And it was actually the flip side it.”

Trump continued by insinuating that the media has hidden his black supporters.
“We have tremendous African-American support,” he said. “The reason is I’m intending to bring jobs to our country. However when these sleazy people, these dishonest individuals who never show the crowds … And showed that event, it made it appear like the white guy was on my side.”
The presumptive GOP nominee has previously claimed he’ll prosper with black voters in November’s general election. However, a Quinnipiac Poll released today found Hillary Clinton winning 93 percent of a given black vote inside a potential match-up having the business mogul.
Author Resource Box:

 

Ethics, Politics

Why the new Trump University documents give Democrats exactly the weapon meets the necessary needs

1 Comment

trump-hands-head

Three months ago, Marco Rubio tried to utilize story of Trump University to trim down down his primary rival. “He’s hoping to give to the American people what he did to those in this particular course,” Rubio said within a debate, setting about to turn how it is into your metaphor for the complete Trump candidacy. “He’s attempting to con people into giving him their vote identical to he conned these people into giving him their money.” But as you can possibly recall, it didn’t work — Trump kept rolling, right over Rubio and right to the Republican nomination.
However as you read this, there’s probably a focus group in progress somewhere, in which undecided voters are shown documents from the originial and Trump University lawsuit and prized their reaction while Democratic pollsters and media consultants watch eagerly from behind one-way glass, convinced this is the attack which Trump cannot recover. And they might not be wrong.
What changed? The vague and somewhat abstract became concrete, by using documents typically from class-action lawsuit against Trump, in which former marks — pardon me, students — of Trump U are suing the Republican standard-bearer for fraud. Now that your fax have been publicly released, instead of general characterizations of what happened there, we’ve former employees testifying on how these were instructed to encourage the students to reach the limit on their cards, how they ordered students’ desperation (“is it a single parent of three children that may need money for food?”) being a tool to manipulate them into making ever-larger purchases of a given supposedly life-changing seminars, or the way Trump U salesman was reprimanded after he failed to push a struggling couple to subscribe a $35,000 package because he knew they couldn’t afford it (unfortunately to them, another salesman stepped in and closed the sale).
Any political consultant can tell you that if you want to say your opponent lied or call him a hypocrite, it’s much more effective if by chance you have got his actual words — and it’s more appropriate if they’re on tape. The better concrete the evidence, the harder it is to pay no attention to or explain away. That’s what these Trump University documents do: not just recast this specific tale, but allow Democrats to make it a metaphor for Trump’s candidacy, really as Rubio tried without success to perform.
Trump’s wealth has represented numerous factors to voters until the now. To lots of people of his supporters, his plane and resorts and spectacularly gold-plated apartment (done within a method we might call Late Russian Mobster) represent success, proof of Trump’s competence and skill. To lots of people others, his wealth represents Trump’s shallow and classless venality. Except for the most part, until recently finally it was essentially harmless and amusing. That’s as opposed into the last person the Republicans nominated for president, who appeared to actually be apologizing for their wealth — the single last thing Trump will ever do.
Democrats successfully convinced voters that Mitt Romney was obviously a heartless corporate raider who may step over his own mother to help make another million. They had several grounds on which in order to make that case, but none was as powerful as the stories of people that were released using a company Romney’s Bain Capital had bought. In a single devastating super PAC ad, a worker in an Indiana factory told how he and his awesome coworkers were instructed to create stage within their plant; the stage was then mounted by executives who told the gathered workers which the plant was closing and they were all going to lose their jobs. “Seems that whenever we built that stage, it was actually like building my own coffin,” said a male in the ad.
But Trump’s wealth had never appeared to come at anyone’s expense. Sure, you might think Trump Tower serves as a monument to ’80s garishness, but no one’s pushed to purchase a place to rent there. Trump Steaks may well have been a joke, but at worst you are possibly one of the tiny number of people who bought some on a holiday to Sharper Image, ate them, and chose not to really become a repeat customer. Victims were few and far between.
That is actually, until Trump University. Now Democrats can say that just not only is Trump a fraud, he’s a con artist who destroys people’s lives as a way to buy himself a new hair weave. That recasts Trump’s wealth, that have always been his primary qualification for office. The absurd notion that is President Donald Trump rests on the notion that being a successful businessman, he is very good at get things done and create things work. It’s surprisingly hard to believe if you really associate him less with titans of industry and a lot more using the guys running three-card-monte games within the shadow of 1 of his buildings.
All that isn’t to claim that the emerging attack on Trump U is guaranteed to work. Even if Democrats decide to allow it to be the centerpiece of their own campaign against Trump, it’ll be only one piece of an incredibly complicated puzzle. But considering that they usually have a vivid, concrete method to make the case, its probabilities of success are very high.

Author Resource Box:

Ethics, Politics

Trump is under fire about Trump University

1 Comment

A judge, called a “hater” by Donald Trump for his handling of a lawsuit pertaining to the businessman’s Trump University real estate school, has unsealed documents associated with the way it is.

Republican U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump holds a rally with supporters in San Diego, California, U.S. May 27, 2016. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee for any Nov. 8 election, is fighting a lawsuit that accuses his school venture of misleading lots of people who paid as much as $35,000 for seminars to know about the billionaire’s real estate investment strategies.

In an order signed on Friday, U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel said that materials, including Trump University procedures on dealing with students together with media, should be unsealed.

He noted they had recently been published because of the media organization Politico and that a magistrate judge described them previously as “routine” and “commonplace.”

At a rally in north park on Friday, Trump criticized Curiel for his handling associated with Trump University case.

“We have a judge that is a hater of Donald Trump. A hater. He is a hater,” Trump said.

“We’re in the front of a really hostile judge. The judge was appointed by Barack Obama,” Trump said, adding he believed Curiel was Mexican.

Curiel is an American who was simply born in East Chicago, Indiana, and graduated from the Indiana University School of Law.

Legal scholars said Trump could face consequences for slamming the judge, although many speculated that Curiel was unlikely to sanction him formally.

“Mr. Trump’s conduct could possibly be at the mercy of sanction for indirect criminal contempt of court,” said Charles Geyh, a legal ethics expert at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law.

“He has got impugned the honesty associated with the judge in a pending case, and contains done this within the context of a political rally that seems calculated to intimidate by inciting anger among his supporters,” he said.

Arthur Hellman, a specialist on federal courts and judicial ethics at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, said the judge was in a challenging position.

“He can’t respond directly. He’s not expected to talk out of court about proceedings before him. Judges have gotten into trouble defending themselves from attacks. The judge’s hands are actually tied,” he said.

Trump has drawn criticism for his comments about immigrants from Mexico, a few of whom he has said were criminals and rapists.

He’s got proposed building a wall across the U.S. border with Mexico to prevent illegal immigration and requiring Mexico to pay for it.

Hispanics are a vital voting bloc in U.S. presidential elections.

A week ago, Trump knocked one of several highest-profile Hispanic ladies in the Republican Party, criticizing New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez on her behalf handling associated with the state’s economy.

Her office said his criticisms are not substantive. Martinez continues to be touted as a possible vice presidential pick for a Republican ticket.

Resource

Ethics, Politics, Social Justice

Trumps take advantage of 911 money for small businesses

1 Comment

CLAIM: Donald Trump improperly received $150,000 in federal aid earmarked for small enterprises damaged through 9/11 attacks, even though his business was neither small nor damaged among the list of attacks.

trump-hands-head
MOSTLY FALSE
WHAT’S TRUE: Company owned or operated by Donald Trump was entitled to $150,000 in federal aid to businesses affected with all the 9/11 attacks.
WHAT IS FALSE: The grant money was not specifically earmarked for smaller businesses nor was it improperly accessed by Trump. Trump’s businesses failed to lie or mislead federal agencies to in order to qualify underneath the respect of programs, which did not require businesses to get sustained physical harm to remain eligible to get the funds. Trump’s business also was not the greatest large firm to qualify under criteria used by the agency tasked with distributing the grant money.
ORIGIN:In late May 2016 a variety of sites published articles reporting that presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump had improperly received $150,000 in federal aid earmarked for smaller businesses affected by the September 11 attacks and get a property he owned or maintained at 40 Wall Street in New York city. Many social websites shares misleadingly described the reports as “just in” or “breaking,” suggesting that rumors of Trump’s purported fiscal impropriety in terms of 9/11 funds had only recently arrived at light, and the underlying articles mischaracterized the particulars of a given controversy.

Resource

Politics, Social Justice

Trump involved in crafting controversial Trump University ads, executive testified

1 Comment

Donald Trump was personally tangled up in devising the online marketing strategy for Trump University, even vetting potential ads, based on newly disclosed sworn testimony through the company’s top executive taken included in a continuing lawsuit.

Into the testimony, section of a trove of records made public as a result of a federal judge’s Friday order, the executive said that the real estate mogul was associated with discussions and signed off “any time we had a fresh ad.”

“Mr. Trump understandably is protective of his brand name and very protective of his image and how he’s portrayed,” Michael Sexton, Trump University’s president, said within the 2012 deposition. “And he desired to see how his brand name and image were portrayed in Trump University marketing materials. And he had very good and substantive input as well.”

The order Friday from U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel came as a result to a request because of the Washington Post, which argued that the general public had a pastime in mastering about a business run by a potential president. Lawyers for Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee, opposed the release, arguing that the records contained trade secrets.

The records released Tuesday include documents from employees who described Trump University as a scam, as well as internal company manuals, called “playbooks,” which show that instructors were advised to aggressively steer prospective customers toward the most expensive courses. The playbooks advised staff members to gather “personalized information” about participants to help close sales. An example: “Are they a single parent of three children that may need money for food?”

Trump University’s marketing tactics have now been in the center of a case by which former students allege they certainly were defrauded because of the company. Among all of their allegations: which they were misled by ads featuring Trump claiming that he had been overseeing the curriculum and therefore the faculty would be “hand-picked by me.”
Trump has rejected the fraud allegations and has said the organization provided a valuable service. A Trump lawyer, Jill A. Martin, predicted Tuesday that the company will prevail once the case goes to trial, that is anticipated to happen in late November. Most of the newly unsealed evidence, she said, “demonstrates the advanced level of satisfaction from students, and that Trump University taught valuable real estate information.”

Tuesday’s release included an amount of glowing reviews from customers. “Trump University is some of the best money I ever invested!” one customer wrote.

Trump’s exact role in the for-profit educational venture happens to be an important facet of contention. Previously reported testimony from the lawsuit suggested that Trump was not deeply involved in the substance of the courses.

Sexton testified in an independent deposition that Trump would not personally select instructors for the marquee sessions. And Trump, in a sworn deposition, was unable to recall the names of key faculty members.

Even so, according to the newly disclosed testimony from Sexton, the organization was desperate to leverage Trump’s growing celebrity status stemming from his hit reality-television show, “The Apprentice.” Sexton claimed that, throughout the area of the year when the NBC show was airing, ads typically carried slogans associated with this system, such as: “I want you to become my Apprentice.”

These Republicans refuse to vote for Donald Trump

Sexton testified that Trump’s role as “chairman” of Trump University was purposely highlighted in advertising, as was a picture associated with the mogul’s signature.

But he said one potential ad theme built around the idea of teaching students to “invest like a billionaire” was rejected.

“It wasn’t available to people,” Sexton said. “People didn’t necessarily walk around attempting to be a billionaire. They’d be very very happy to be a millionaire. . . . I believe our feeling was that it was almost overwhelming, daunting, you understand; that is not likely to happen.”

The records were unsealed as Trump continued to attack Curiel, the judge overseeing the scenario. He has got previously said Curiel, that is Hispanic, might be biased due to Trump’s proposal for a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. Friday, Trump described the Indiana-born jurist as “Mexican.”

In an appearance Tuesday, Trump said Curiel was “very bad.” Asked why he would risk antagonizing the person presiding over the litigation, he responded: “Because I don’t care. We have a judge who’s very, very unfair. He knows he’s unfair. And I’ll win the Trump University case.”
Trump University was started in 2004 as a small business offering courses in entre­pre­neur­ship under the Trump brand. Trump gave his consent and became a 93 percent owner of this enterprise, based on Sexton’s newly unsealed deposition.

Trump was the centerpiece for the company’s advertising pitches. “Trump University will provide the experience, knowledge and wisdom of Donald Trump himself,” according to marketing materials distributed to potential prospects. In a promotional video, Trump declared that “at Trump University, we teach success. That’s what it’s all about — success.” He described the faculty as “the best of the best,” with instructors “handpicked by me.”

Aside from the class-action lawsuits being considered by Curiel, Trump University faces an independent $40 million fraud case in New York City, filed by state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. A brand new York judge recently ruled that the outcome is going to trial; Trump has appealed the ruling, an ongoing process that is expected to last several months.

The documents unsealed by the federal judge when you look at the class-action case include a contract with a Trump University speaker showing that a percentage regarding the speaker’s compensation was predicated on signing up seminar participants to purchase more Trump University products. Whilst in training, speakers were anticipated to hit a certain sales rate to be retained because of the program, in accordance with the contract.

One former Trump University staffer, Ronald Schnackenberg, wrote in a formal statement unsealed Tuesday that he quit this system in 2007 after working there for less than a year, deciding that it was participating in “misleading, fraudulent and dishonest” practices. His statement said he had been reprimanded by Trump University for not working harder to offer a $35,000 program to a couple who could not afford it and might have needed to use disability pay and that loan applied for against equity within their apartment to fund it.

He said another salesperson talked the couple into spending money on the seminar after he refused. “I happened to be disgusted by this conduct and made a decision to resign,” he wrote.
Schnackenberg wrote that he never saw Trump in seven months, in which he concluded that the program had not been designed to teach about real estate but instead so it “preyed upon older people and uneducated to split up them from their money.”

The newly disclosed documents also include a number of annual behind-the-scenes strategy manuals intended to guide Trump University employees.

Known as “playbooks,” the documents instruct staff when you look at the minutiae of setting ready to go free introductory courses, but emphasize that participants ought to be pressed to join up for additional, pricey classes.

Politics, Social Justice

Trump’s national movement

Leave a comment

Donald Trump calls his presidential campaign a mass movement, but he must show they can coax enough support from voters who twice delivered the White House to Barack Obama.

The billionaire businessman depended almost exclusively on conservative and GOP-leaning whites — a lot of them men — to secure the . Now he must look forward to a wider, more diverse voting population in his likely general election matchup with Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton.

His capacity to seize on marginal shifts during the electorate may see whether they can pull off a victory once unthinkable. Trump’s task is crucial to flipping back in the GOP column several of the most contested states that Obama won twice.

This challenge could very well be most evident in Florida, a culturally, racially and ideologically varied state where Obama defeated Republican Mitt Romney four years ago by less than 75,000 votes away from more than 8.4 million cast.

This means small shifts anywhere in the electorate could make a difference — from turnout changes among white small-town and rural Republicans or urban, nonwhite Democrats to partisans, embittered by contentious nominating bouts, choosing third-party candidates or declining to vote after all; of course Trump can’t close the gaps in Florida, he has got little shot at winning key Rust Belt and Great Lakes states where Obama’s advantages were greater.

“We still elect presidents utilising the Electoral College … dependent on states which are made up of diverse electorates,” cautions GOP pollster Whit Ayres. “There aren’t enough angry white individuals to create a big part within the new America of 2016, (and) running up your numbers with white males in Mississippi does not get you yet another electoral vote than Mitt Romney.”

Certainly one of Trump’s vanquished primary rivals, Sen. Marco Rubio, told reporters this week Trump can win Florida, that has gone because of the winner in most presidential contest since 1996, provided that they can “continue to become Donald.” That brash outsider pitch has sewn up support from white men like Jack Oliver, a 66-year-old construction worker from West Palm Beach and 84-year-old Frank Papa, a retired grocery manager from Clearwater.

The online world of Things (IoT) has got the potential to resolve our biggest global challenges and bring people everywhere an even better standard of living.
Oliver cites Trump’s hard line on immigration and calls him a leader “who will finally give a damn about people just like me.” Papa, an innovative new Jersey native, says Trump “speaks my language, talks and thinks anything like me.”

But Trump must expand his reach. “If he can’t unify Republicans, there in fact isn’t enough votes for him in order to make up elsewhere,” said Steve Schale, who ran Obama’s 2008 campaign in Florida. He said Florida elections have already been close for a long time, noting 41 million combined presidential votes have now been cast since 1992, with less than 131,000 votes separating the combined totals of Democratic and Republican nominees.

Trump gives lip service into the electorate’s diversity, suggesting “the Mexican people” will “vote for me personally like crazy” and therefore he can win 25 % of African-Americans. The best wide range of African-Americans won by any GOP nominee since 1980 is mostly about 12 percent. He said recently he could lure “40 percent” of voters backing Clinton’s primary opponent, Bernie Sanders.

Some nonwhite Floridians mock Trump’s claims about his or her own appeal.

“I haven’t heard any one of my (black) friends say they’ll vote for Trump,” said Tanisha Winns, 39, a black Democrat in Lakeland, located along central Florida’s Interstate 4 corridor that twice helped give Republican George W. Bush the statewide victory before swinging in Obama’s favor. “If anything, I’m hearing my white friends say they won’t,” Winns added.

For the time being, Florida polls suggest Trump and Clinton are running about even, with about 15 percent undecided. But you will find variables which should give Trump pause.

In 2012, nonwhites accounted for nearly a 3rd of most votes cast in Florida, in comparison to 28 percent nationwide. But population growth, driven by Hispanics, suggests both numbers could possibly be higher come November.

Obama beat Romney among Florida’s black voters, with 95 percent. The president won Hispanics by a 60-40 margin, closer than his 71-27 advantage nationally, with numerous of Florida’s conservative Cuban-American voters accounting for any difference. Those numbers still left Romney too reliant on whites. He managed 61 percent of Florida’s white vote — much better than his 59 percent nationally — but he needed seriously to get nearer to 63 percent to win the Sunshine State’s 29 electoral votes.
Demographers and pollsters from both parties say Trump likely would need to push to the mid- to high-60s with whites — an even no candidate has reached since Ronald Reagan’s 1984 landslide — to have the possibility nationally. That’s even more daunting considering an AP-GfK poll, taken in April, that found two out of three white women view Trump negatively.

One of them are Republicans the nominee absolutely must get.

In Clearwater, Republican Barbie Sugas says she’s always voted for any GOP nominee, however the 47-year-old surgical technician said she’s “kind of leaning toward Clinton” because she does not “trust Trump” with international affairs.

To be certain, Clinton also must shore up her Democratic base, still divided with Sanders within the race. Jennifer Perelman, a Sanders supporter, says she won’t back the previous secretary of state. But she won’t vote for Trump either. Her plan: to vote for Sanders as a write-in candidate.

Ayres, the Republican pollster, affirmed that it is “not impossible” for Trump to fashion a fantastic coalition. But, he says, “You’re basically arguing that somehow, a consistent 20-year-plus demographic trend is merely planning to magically stop.”

Resource

Politics

Trump keeps giving Republicans major cause for alarm

1 Comment

Featured Image -- 1043He said he would not say it.

But Donald Trump seemingly couldn’t resist.

“I wonder if i possibly could say — you realize, remember lyin’. Lyin’. I won’t say ‘Lyin’ Ted’ — I refuse to say it,” he told a crowd during a Friday rally in Fresno, California.

“Lyin’ Ted!” Trump then exclaimed. “Holds that Bible high, puts it down, and then he lies. Lyin’ Ted. Well, I’m going to retire that from Ted — I’m not likely to call Ted that anymore.”

Trump had resurrected perhaps his most infamous moniker to discuss shifting it from Ted Cruz, the Texas senator who challenged him for any Republican nomination, to Hillary Clinton.

However the incident helped illuminate a still-signature part of Trump’s campaign rallies: his insults of fellow Republicans.

The Manhattan billionaire is almost a complete month into being the GOP’s presumptive nominee, but his rallies in the last week have shown which he doesn’t appear to be easing up on fellow Republicans who possess drawn his ire.

During a Tuesday rally in New Mexico, for example, Trump unleashed on Susana Martinez, the state’s governor. Martinez could be the first Latina governor in US history. And she actually is a Republican.

But all of that didn’t stop Trump for attacking Martinez — one of a number of GOP governors who have yet to come out to get Trump — for not attending his rally.

“We have to ensure you get your governor get started — she’s got to do a more satisfactory job, OK?” Trump said. “Your governor has to do a better job. … She’s not doing the task. Hey, maybe I’ll run for governor of brand new Mexico — I’ll understand this place going. She’s not doing the job. We surely got to get her moving. Think about it. Let’s go, governor.”

GOP strategist and commentator Evan Siegfried, who is anti-Trump, wrote on Business Insider the following day that the remark showed Republicans can’t trust the real-estate magnate.

He wrote:

Several days ago, Trump’s campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, managed to get clear to Republicans that when they distanced themselves from Trump, they might not face any retribution. This was an intelligent move considering how toxic Trump is by using every key demographic needed to win an election. Unfortunately, it seems that Donald Trump either would not get the memo or, even worse, he made a decision to ignore it. The message this sends with other Republicans must certanly be chilling: Trump can’t be taken at his word.

Later when you look at the week, Trump homed in on two of his favorite targets which have said they will not support him: Jeb Bush, the previous Florida governor and failed 2016 presidential hopeful, and Mitt Romney, the 2012 GOP nominee.

Claiming that he had “a shop that’s worth more cash” than Romney during a Wednesday rally in Anaheim, California, Trump said if Romney would’ve decided to run for president in this election cycle “he would’ve been out quickly.”

“I understand losers,” Trump said of Romney.

Trump also compared Romney a number of animals.

Romney “walked like a penguin round the stage,” Trump said.

“He choked like your pet dog,” Trump continued. “You ever see in athletics? He’s a choker. And you understand the truth, I hate to say this: Once a choker, always a choker. I was nasty about this.”

Of Bush, Trump resurrected his “low-energy” label associated with the one-time 2016 presidential candidate.

“Jeb hasn’t done it yet,” Trump said regarding Bush endorsing his candidacy. “He can get a burst of energy, after which he can do it. He has to get up the energy. No, Jeb will not be nice.”

For the reason that same Anaheim rally, Trump spent a quick moment discussing the State Department inspector general’s report faulting Clinton’s email practices, saying it really is “not very good.”

Tony Fratto, who served as deputy press secretary through the George W. Bush administration, called Trump a “vile creature” when discussing his continued penchant for ripping Republicans.

“Look, I do not whitewash my views with this — i do believe there is never been a far more vile creature to ever run for president than Donald Trump,” Fratto told Business Insider in an interview last week. “I think way too many people have a tendency to treat him like an ordinary candidate and appearance during the things he says and does and attempts to find normal explanations for them, but there aren’t any normal explanations for them because he’s a monster.”

“And monsters don’t do normal, rational things,” he continued.

Fratto said he had “no earthly idea” why he would target Martinez when he has to improve his standing among both women and Hispanics, groups with which Trump holds distinctly low favorability ratings.

“since there is no normal idea — there isn’t any normal, rational basis for that,” he said. “It is irrational and destructive, and that’s why i do believe ultimately, at the conclusion of the afternoon, that is why he loses.”

Last week’s NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found that Trump has consolidated support inside the party.

That poll found just 6% of Republicans surveyed said they mightn’t back Trump into the fall, while 86% responded that they’d offer the presumptive Republican nominee. An ABC News/Washington Post poll found near identical results.

But Fratto said consolidating the party is not going to be adequate to win, and also the constant insults will have to stop for Trump to own a shot.

“We have had the Republican Party unified for multiple elections,” he said. “and also the facts are we’ve won the popular vote in exactly one election since 1988. So when you look at the best of that time period, using the best of candidates, and a unified party, we now have a hard time winning national elections.”

He continued:

If you believe we’re going to win one with a candidate that is intent every single day to divide the party is perhaps all you must know about why he will lose. The question in my situation isn’t whether he will win or lose — I’m very confident he will lose — the real question is how much damage is he likely to do in order to the party.

Just how long will people just like me feel just like you want to be a part of a party that would nominate someone like him and possess to blow all of our time explaining the truly ridiculous items that he does.

Resource

Politics, Uncategorized

Liar, Liar Campaign is on fire

1 Comment

trump-hands-headWhen Donald Trump spoke to Republicans that his campaign had money, it was a lie. In ending up in Senate Republicans, Trump’s campaign privately admitted that they don’t have any money and won’t be able to run television ads until following the GOP convention in July.

The Washington Examiner reported:
Donald Trump’s campaign has alerted Senate Republicans that he won’t have much money to pay to fend off attacks from Hillary Clinton in the next couple months.

The notice came when Paul Manafort, Trump’s senior advisor, met with a group of Senate Republican chiefs of staff for lunch a week ago, sources familiar with the meeting told the Washington Examiner. The admission implies that Trump will undoubtedly be much more determined by the GOP brass for money than he has got led voters to think. Nevertheless, it’s in line with his reliance in the Republican National Committee to give you a ground game in battleground states.

“They understand that they’re not planning to are able to afford to become on TV in June and probably nearly all of July, until they actually accept the nomination and acquire RNC funds, so they really plan to just use earned media to compete in the airwaves,” one GOP source familiar with Manafort’s comments told the Examiner.

Trump is additionally refusing to utilize their own money to fund his campaign. To put it differently, what Donald Trump is telling the voters is utterly distinctive from what exactly is happening in today’s world.

When Republicans nominated Trump, they believed that they were getting a billionaire who could help the party raise money while throwing his own cash in to the pot for his White House bid.

What the GOP is stuck with is a deadbeat who talks a beneficial game that they’re likely to have to fund during the general election because he is either unwilling or not able to pull his own weight.

Donald Trump’s wealth seems to be a myth, and it’s also obvious that Trump is utilizing the Republican Party to create his cult of personality. Donald Trump has no intention of giving anything back Republicans.

Trump’s inability to operate ads in June and July is a present to Democrats, who must certanly be blanketing the airwaves on the next 8 weeks. Democrats have to be able to define Trump, in which he can’t fight back. Supporters should be prepared to see Democrats strike early and frequently before Trump may even get his ads on the air.

Donald Trump’s “business sense” has struck again. This time, Trump has bankrupted his presidential campaign and it is expecting Republicans to pick up the tab.

Resource