Person blames God for mistreating people.
Source: How should you respond when a person blames God for not treating people with respect?
All posts by Kenneth Dantzler-Corbin
How should you respond when a person blames God for not treating people with respect?
In response to this article: When I read this article and thought another one. I thought God said love your neighbor. I believe Torah teaches us to love the stranger. It is strange when how we blame God for our wrong doing.
A South Carolina tow pickup truck driver said God told him to leave a handicapped Bernie Sanders ally stranded along the interstate.
Cassy McWade was involved in a car crash near Asheville, North Carolina, and her family members called their frequent mechanic to drive forty-five minutes north of his shop to take her wrecked auto back for auto repairs, reported WHNS-TV.
Ken Shupe, an owner of Shupee Max Towing, arrived about an hour in the future and began connecting McWade’s car about his truck — until he seen the Sanders plan sticker on her fender and the yard signal placed in her rear end window.
“He circles back and comes back and says, ‘I cannot tow you, ‘,i” McWade said. “My first instinct was there must be something wrong with all the car, and he says, ‘No, you’re a Bernie supporter. ’ And I was like, ‘Wait – really? ’ And he says, ‘Yes ma’am, ’ and walks away. ”
Shupe offered a supernatural explanation intended for his decision to leave the 25-year-old McWade, who is affected with arthritis and other health problems, alongside I-26.
“Something came over me personally, I think theGod told me, and He just said, ‘Get in the truck and leave,’” Shupe said. “And onceIgot in my pickup truck, you know, I was, therefore, proud, because We felt like I finally drew a collection in the sand and stood up for what I believed. ”
The Donald Trump ally then offered a far more earthly explanation intended for stranding the customer.
“Every business dealing in recent history with a socialist-minded person I have not become paid, ” Shupe said. “I personal this truck. This says, ‘Shupee, ’ not ‘freebie. ’ Every time I cope with these people I obtain ‘Berned’ with an ‘e’ – not a ‘u’. ”
McWade — who suffers from psoriatic arthritis, fibromyalgia, serious fatigue syndrome, and early-stage Crohn’s disease – is by law disabled and exhibits a handicapped placard on her rear-view hand mirror, but the mechanic explained he wasn’t mindful of her disability.
The woman said her spouse and children told Shupe regarding her health problems — but he explained it wouldn’t currently have mattered much, at any rate.
“Had she recently been disabled, would I’ve towed her car? No ma’am, ” Shupe said. “I would have pulled onward and sat at this time there with her to make certain she was fine until another wrecker service showed up to get her residence safely, but I just still would not have got towed her car. ”
“I uphold my decision, and I would do it again today if the opportunity offered itself, ” Shupe said.
The conservative Christian suggested he had a religious right to decline service to Sanders followers.
“I respect their very own beliefs, and I desire they respect my personal views, ” Shupe said.
McWade anxiously waited alone for another 50 percent hour, terrified that her Crohn’s disease would flare up, till another mechanic came, and she remains to be mystified by Shupe’s behavior.
“I, personally don’t believe that you don’t have to agree with anything just to become kind to one another, ” McWade said. “I was like, ‘What performed I do to you? ’ You know, I do consider I try to carry out right by persons. So I was genuinely offended, and I don’t really know what exactly he perceives I would have done to him directly since they can be a believer in Bernie. ”
Reference
Could there be hidden bias groups in Britain?
Nearly half a century ago, when he first became a working supporter of Britain’s Work Party, Rabbi Abraham Pinter said it had much less of a problem with anti-Semitism than the country as a whole.
But whilst other political groups have got recognized the need to address bias against Jews, Pinter stated the country’s main resistance party was stuck in past times.
Labour now faces claims of anti-Semitism in its rates – from its high-profile previous London mayor Ken Livingstone, who said Adolf Hitler had supported Zionism, to students at Oxford University or college. This has fanned concern amongst Jewish communities already concerned at increasing levels of hate crimes.
“The Labour Party never recognized it a new problem. It’s really exactly where it was 50 years ago, inch said Pinter, a former Work councilor who speaks pertaining to the Orthodox Haredi Judaism community in the Restaurant Stamford grand Hill area of north Greater London.
“It’s been there and it’s really still there, ” this individual told Reuters.
Some inside Labour say they are getting accused of anti-Semitism only for expressing legitimate criticisms of Israel. Senior figures have got said prejudice is limited to a small fringe and had been used to smear party head Jeremy Corbyn.
But the line could play a role in Thursday’s London mayoral election. Work candidate Sadiq Khan, broadly tipped to become the capital’s first Muslim mayor, stated he was appalled simply by Livingstone’s comments and that they can harm his chances within a city home to an approximated 170, 000 Jews.
Moshe Menezira, manager of the Kosher Deli in Golders Green in north London, that has a large Jewish community, stated there seemed to be an issue within Labour and that it had been leading to many Jewish voters reconsidering whether to back again Khan.
“I know a lot of Labour supporters yet they’re in two thoughts because of what is going on, ” the 65-year-old said.
Last week, Labour’s leadership suspended Livingstone and ordered an inquiry in to anti-Semitism in the party following comments the ex-mayor made in a radio interview that Hitler had backed Zionism in the 1930s before “he went crazy and ended up killing 6 million Jews”.
Livingstone have been defending a Labour Muslim lawmaker after she apologized for posting online text messages which included a suggestion that His home country of israel should be relocated to the United states of america to solve the problems in the Middle East.
The incidents sparked claims from Jewish leaders that Labour leaders and those for the British political left had been doing too little to overcome anti-Semitism in their ranks.
“There is now a cancer within their party and it is getting even worse by the day, ” the Judaism Chronicle newspaper said within an editorial in March. “If Labour is not to reduce the last residue of trust from our community, it must recognize and deal with that cancer. ”
Suspensions
Competitors of Labour have previously leveled accusations of anti-Semitism against socialist Corbyn, who had been elected party leader last September. They pointed to a speech he produced about the Middle East last year, in which he described Hamas and Hezbollah – groupings designated as terrorist agencies by Britain and the United states of america – as “friend.
Conventional Prime Minister raised individuals comments during heated exchanges with Corbyn in parliament on Wednesday.
“Are they will your friends or are they not really? Because those organizations within their constitutions believe in persecuting and killing Jews, ” Cameron said. “They’re anti-Semitic agencies, they’re racist organizations, this individual must stand up and state they are not his close friends. ”
Corbyn replied: “Obviously anyone that commits racist works or is anti-Semitic can be not a friend of my own. ”
The Labour head has previously said he previously used the term friends in “a collective way”.
The parliament exchange and the line surrounding Livingstone followed harming headlines for Labour in February, when the co-chairman of the Oxford University Work Club quit, saying “a large proportion of both OULC and the student still left in Oxford more generally have some kind of problem with Jews”.
On Tuesday, Labour stated it had suspended 3 councillors in northern and central England because of anti-Semitic remarks.
Independent Jewish Sounds, a human rights group set up in 2007 which criticizes some of Israel’s policies, stated it was concerned at capturing suggestions that anti-Semitism was pervasive in the party.
“We also reiterate the view that the battle against anti-Semitism is undermined anytime opposition to Israeli federal government policies is automatically top quality as anti-Semitic, ” this said.
But some Jewish market leaders say Labour has more than the usual fringe problem, with anti-Zionism often used as a cover for being anti-Jewish.
“In latest days, we have heard anti-Semitism in the Labour Party described variously as ‘a smear’ and as ‘mood music’ being manipulated by politics opponents of Jeremy Corbyn, ” Britain’s Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis wrote in Wednesday’s Daily Telegraph paper.
“There has been nothing more disheartening in this story than the suggestion that this much more about politics than regarding substance. ”
‘Becoming acceptable’
The anti-Semitism row can be casting a shadow more than Khan’s push to become gran of London, an associated with about 8. 5 mil people.
Most Jewish voters say they have no issue with Khan himself, who stated he was disgusted simply by Livingstone’s remarks.
The Labour leadership generally needs to act far more important and swiftly when these types of comments are made, ” this individual said on Tuesday. “It can’t be right that there are Londoners of Jewish faith who have feel the Labour party is not a place on their behalf. ”
In Golders Green, where Jewish men putting on skull caps push buggies along the street past Kosher shops and restaurants that line the main highway, there is certainly real concern that the line engulfing Labour could energy prejudice in Britain.
Law enforcement figures showed an increase greater than 60 percent in anti-Semitic incidents in London last year, as the Community Security Trust, which usually advises Britain’s estimated 280, 000 Jews on protection matters, said 924 situations were recorded across the country during 2015, including 86 chaotic assaults.
Earlier this month, parliament’s Home Affairs Panel said it would hold a brief inquiry into anti-Semitism more than concerns prejudice was increasing.
In the London Judaism Family Centre in Golders Green, Denise, 61, who have declined to give her surname, said anti-Semitism in The uk had got “way worse” since she moved from South Africa four years ago.
“Six to eight weeks back I was walking across a bridge and a car ceased and the people inside known as me a bloody Jew. The 1st time ever it’s happened in my opinion in four years, inch she said.
The line has been disheartening for Jews involved in Labour politics who have support Khan’s stance.
Mike Katz, the National Vice-Chairman of the Jewish Labour Motion and a Labour applicant for the London Set up, said the expansion from about 200, 000 to about 380, 000 party members since Corbyn became leader had led to the amount of people with anti-Semitic views also increasing.
“People over modern times have found it simpler to pursue a discourse exactly where it is acceptable to say these items and blur the lines between legitimate criticism of Israel and something which will go far further, ” this individual told Reuters.
Rabbi Pinter, who said he was embarrassed that he utilized to count Livingstone as a friend, said those in Work who denied there was a problem were part of the problem.
“People are getting concerned that this is certainly causing anti-Semitism to become popular. My concern is it could becoming acceptable, ” this individual said.
Reference
http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/news/1.717911
Native lives Matter
The majority of the recent headlines about indigenous Americans have had to do with a specific football team.
There are 567 tribes, including 229 Alaska Native communities, currently identified by the federal government. The Bureau of Indian Affairs – the main federal agency in charge of {relations|relationships} with indigenous communities– is also considering increasing federal status to Native Hawaiians.
Each of the federally known tribes is a nation unto itself – sovereign, self-determining and self-governing — that maintains a government-to-government relationship with the United States. In addition , the rights of all indigenous individuals, including Native Hawaiians, have already been affirmed in a 2007 United Nations declaration. Each indigenous nation has a distinct history, language and culture. While many encounter concerns that are particular to their government, state, or region, there are certain issues that have an effect on all Native communities through the entire United States – from The Hawaiian islands to Maine, and Alaska to Florida.
Thanks in large part to the Black Lives Matter movement, which has was adamant that demands for proper rights and equality for the black community remain part of the nationwide conversation, there is now growing energy to address the issues of policing and mass incarceration. While the brutalization of black Americans at the hands of police, and their maltreatment within the criminal justice program, have garnered national head lines, similar injustices against Natives have gone largely unreported.
Previously this month, Paul Castaway, a mentally ill Rosebud Sioux tribal citizen, was taken and killed by Denver Colorado police. His death resulted in protests in the Denver Indigenous community, and has reveal the shocking rate where police kill Native Americans — who account for less than 1% of the national population, yet who make up nearly two percent of all police killings, according to data published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Native peoples are also disproportionately affected by mass incarceration. In states with significant Native populations, Natives are wildly overrepresented inside the criminal justice system. In South Dakota, for example , Natives make up 9 percent from the total population, but twenty nine percent of the prison populace. In Alaska, Native peoples take into account 15 percent of the total population and 38 percent of the prison population. And Native Hawaiians are only 10 % of the state’s population, although 39 percent of the incarcerated population.
The issue of mass incarceration in Native communities can be complicated by overlapping and unresolved conflicts between tribe, federal and state jurisdictions. If a crime is considered to have occurred on a Native booking or within a Native community, it’s not always clear which will agency is going to be in charge of criminal prosecution. That’s determined by a complex pair of factors, including the severity with the charges and the races with the victims and alleged perpetrators. The overlapping jurisdictions of federal and tribal sovereignty also mean that Indians who have commit crimes on tribe lands can be punished 2 times for the same offense: once underneath federal jurisdiction and once again in tribal court. Last but not least, aside from cases of home violence, tribal courts are generally not allowed to try major criminal activity as defined under the Key Crimes Act. This means that potential foods in most felony cases happen to be prosecuted in federal process of law, where sentencing tends to be worse.
In February, building off of the momentum of Black Lives Matter, the Lakota Peoples’ Law Project released the “Native Lives Matter“ record, which gives an overview of the inequities faced by Native Americans inside the criminal justice system. The report, like the voices of Native peoples in general, has been generally ignored in the growing nationwide conversation about policing and criminal justice reform.
Reference
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/13-native-american-issues_us_55b7d801e4b0074ba5a6869c
If Laws Are Set in Stone to Prevent Discrimination, Why Is Discrimination A Problem?
Government and most states’ laws prohibit workplace race bigotry. In fact, Title VII — the federal law that forbids race discrimination — has recently been on the books for almost… Source: If Laws …
Source: If Laws Are Set in Stone to Prevent Discrimination, Why Is Discrimination A Problem?
If Laws Are Set in Stone to Prevent Discrimination, Why Is Discrimination A Problem?
Government and most states’ laws prohibit workplace race bigotry. In fact, Title VII — the federal law that forbids race discrimination — has recently been on the books for almost…
Source: If Laws Are Set in Stone to Prevent Discrimination, Why Is Discrimination A Problem?
If Laws Are Set in Stone to Prevent Discrimination, Why Is Discrimination A Problem?
There are times when we think that we know the laws of the land, but do we really know them. I asked several people about their rights as a citizen. I was surprised that many individuals did not know their rights on jobs, are in the general public. When I was coming up in school, they taught us civics. It is a shame that many people do not know anything about civics. I asked another person did they know what civics was. The reply was, that they believe it was something that dealt with an alien take over of the world. I could not do nothing but laugh. Whatever alien that has taken over the world is from the planet ignoramus. Whatever happened, it erased knowledge of the past and is now on course of a scary future.
Government and most states’ laws prohibit workplace race bigotry. In fact, Title VII — the federal law that forbids race discrimination — has recently been on the books for almost five decades now. However, apparently, some business employers have not gotten the message, because racial discrimination still happens more often than anyone wants to believe. Inside fact, it is the most common type of discrimination employees are accountable to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the federal agency that enforces Title VII.
Discrimination pays a very high price, both from the victims and from the companies that let it occur. Legal cases in recent times have proven this point, as large companies have experienced to pay for a huge amount to compensate the sufferers of competition discrimination and also to pay for their complicity in motivating or allowing a discriminatory atmosphere to prosper in the work environment.
An employer does race discrimination when it makes job judgments by nationality or when it retreats into seemingly unbiased job guidelines that disproportionately affect members of a particular contest.
Federal and most states’ laws and regulations prohibit race elegance in every aspect of employment, including employing, firing, promotions, compensation, job training, discipline, and termination.
Whenever an employer deliberately public out candidates or employees of a particular race for less favorable treatment, that is “disparate treatment” discrimination. However, the burden falls more heavily on employees of a particular race, that is “disparate impact” discrimination.
An employee who makes a disparate treatment claim alleges that he or she was handled differently than other employees who were in similar situations, due to employee’s competition. For example, a boss promotes only white employees to remedies positions, requires only job seekers of a certain race to submit to drug tests, or refuses to allow employees of certain races to deal with customers.
An employer that discriminates by physical characteristics associated with a particular race — such as hair texture or color, skin color, or facial features — also commits disparate treatment discrimination.
In a disparate impact legal action, the employee does not state that the employer purposely singled out employees of a particular race for bad treatment. Instead, the employee claims that the employer’s apparently neutral policy, rule, or practice has a disproportionately negative effect on users of a particular competition.
For example, a work policy requiring men to be clean-shaven may discriminate against African-American men, who are more likely to experience Pseudofolliculitis barbae (a painful skin condition triggered and exacerbated by shaving). A minimum height need may screen out excessive numbers of Asian Us and Latino job candidates. Analysis on hiring any applicant with an arrest or conviction record could disproportionately affect Latino and Black men.
If an employee implies that a particular policy has a disproportionate impact on members of the particular race, the employer can defend the plan by showing that there is a legitimate, important, job-related reason that necessitates the policy. For example, a height requirement might be justified if the employer can present that an employee must be at least a certain level to operate a particular type of machinery. However, an employer would be hard-pressed to justify a level requirement for a office position.
Harassment is also restricted. Harassment is any behavior based on a person’s actions that create an overwhelming, hostile, or offensive work environment or interferes with the individual’s works performance. Harassing might include racial slurs, jokes in regards to a particular ethnic group, physical acts of significance to a certain racial group.
Not every joke or inappropriate remark could be harassment, from a legal perspective. Place of work conduct must be unwelcome. Also it must be adequately severe or pervasive to change the conditions and conditions of the victim’s employment, to qualify as harassment. If the conduct is extreme, an individual incident might be enough to create a hostile environment. Physical assault, use of “the N-word, ” or hanging a noose, for example, might be so threatening and insulting as to be a nuisance. In the event the comments or functions are much less offensive, they will constitute harassment if they often happen enough to change the workplace surroundings.
Reference
What Is Race Discrimination? | Nolo.com. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/fighting-race-national-origin-discriminat
If A Person Is Running For The Highest Office in The Nation, Should He or She Have Knowledge On Hot Button Issues?
This is a sensitive subject for women. Punishing women, that is an interesting concept. The problem is, some would like to elect Trump as president. So, if Trump is going to punish women. Women you…
If A Person Is Running For The Highest Office in The Nation, Should He or She Have Knowledge On Hot Button Issues?
This is a sensitive subject for women. Punishing women, that is an interesting concept. The problem is, some would like to elect Trump as president. So, if Trump is going to punish women. Women you need to run and run fast. Though, I personally believe in life or give the child to a loving family who can not have children that would be ideal for those families. But, to punish a woman for this. We are only human, we have no right to judge and when laws are passed to box women in, with no rights, that is just modern-day institutionalized slavery. We need to call it out and recognize what it is. We do not know if the woman was attacked or forced to have a child because of a horrific experience. I cannot be the judge on any person’s life. This is something the person will have to live with.
“The woman is a target in this case as is the life in her womb.”
Donald Trump said in a new interview Wednesday that he would support banning abortions, as well as “some form of punishment” for women who undergo the procedure illegally. However, he or she later backed far from those comments amid critique from rivals in both events.
The original exchange came as MSNBC’s Chris Matthews attempted to pin Trump down on his views about child killing illegal baby killing in an interview which aired Wed night. Matthews requested the Republican presidential frontrunner, “How can you ban illegal baby killing? Just how do you do it? ”
After repeating his stance of being “pro-life” multiple times, Trump said, “You know you will go back to a position like where they experienced where people perhaps will go to against the law places… However, you have to prohibit it. ”
Matthews hard pressed Trump on which should happen to women who get abortions under a future ban—the prospect has called for creating a commitment to reversing the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Sort decision a litmus test for appointing justices. “There needs to be some form of punishment, ” Trump said, but that he has “not determined what the punishment would be. ”
Matthews requested if the man who got the lady pregnant would be legally responsible. Trump responded, “I would say no, ”
Shortly after a segment of the interview was posted online Wednesday afternoon, Overcome released a statement, stating the “issue is not clear and really should be put back into the says for dedication. ” The particular prospect then released another statement walking back his comments on punishing girls that have abortions.
“If Congress were to pass legislation making illegal baby killing illegitimate and the government courts upheld this law, or any state was permitted to ban child killing illegal baby-killing under state, and federal government law. The doctor or any other person performing the illegitimate would be placed legally responsible, not the lady, ” Trump said in the other statement. “The woman is a sufferer in cases like this being the life in her womb. My position has not changed—like Ronald Reagan; We are pro-life with exceptions. ”
Conservative prospects who are at odds of illegal baby killing rights recommend legal repercussions for physicians and medical providers who perform abortions although not for women. However, Trump, who once described himself as “very pro-choice” and says he has since “evolved” on the issue, was evidently less comfortable under asking.
Other individuals in the race for president immediately jumped on Trump.
Reference
Donald Trump Tries To Clarify Abortion Punishment Comments … (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AngiKWkaIDk
Watch out the Laws You Pass to Discriminate, Could these Laws Come Back to be Your Nightmare?
Anti-gay religious community heads in Kokomo, Indiana, are getting down on their knees to pray that they will remain to enjoy the privilege to discriminate against LGBT persons.
Source: Watch out the Laws You Pass to Discriminate, Could these Laws Come Back to be Your Nightmare?
The Dantzler Report! 