Category Archives: Politics

Politics

Little Bernie turns Trump into big chicken

1 Comment

Cassidy-Bernie-Sanders-Loud-and-Clear-1200Bernie Sanders expressed his frustration with the Republican presidential nominee after Donald Trump backed out on debating Sanders in California.

After there had been at least two offers produced by television networks to host the debate and make sizable donations to charity, Donald Trump backed out. In a statement, Trump said, “Based on the undeniable fact that the Democratic nominating process is wholly rigged, and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will likely not allow Bernie Sanders to win, yet again I will be the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the 2nd place finisher. Likewise, the networks would you like to make a killing on these events and so are not proving to become too generous to charitable causes, in this case, women’s health problems. Therefore, as far as I would you like to debate Bernie Sanders – and it could be an easy payday – I am going to wait to discuss the first place finisher within the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it could be.”

Trump has come up with two excuses for backing out. Bernie Sanders is a loser. Additionally the television networks aren’t paying enough money to any debate.

Bernie Sanders responded to Trump with a blistering statement:

In recent days, Donald Trump has said he wants to debate, he doesn’t would you like to debate, he wants to debate and, now, he doesn’t would you like to debate.

Because there are many television networks ready to carry this debate and donate funds to charity, I hope which he changes his mind once again and comes up to speed.

There is certainly a reason why in just about any national and statewide poll I am defeating Donald Trump, sometimes by vast margins and more often than not by far larger margins than Secretary Clinton. There is certainly a reason for that reality, in addition to American people must be able to notice it in advance in an excellent debate and a clash of ideas.

The truth is that Trump never had any intention of debating Bernie Sanders. The Trump campaign admitted which they were only thinking about the idea because of all of the publicity that the theory generated. Bernie Sanders continues to be calling Trump a liar for months. Therefore it should come as no surprise to him that Trump lied in regards to the debate.

The networks could offer $20 million, and Trump will say no. They can provide $100 million, and Trump would say no because he doesn’t desire to debate Bernie Sanders.

Trump is afraid to debate Sen. Sanders. Bernie Sanders more than held his very own with Hillary Clinton, while Trump struggled in debates with Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz.

Donald Trump would probably get his clock cleaned by Bernie Sanders, which can be the biggest reason why the Republican nominee chickened from the debate.

Resource

Politics

Trump making promises that he might not keep

1 Comment

Featured Image -- 1043The truth is, Donald Trump has now made a very important policy statement. Introducing what he billed as an “energy plan,” Trump promised to “cancel the Paris Climate Plan.” Unlike so much of what originates from Trump on policy, this is certainly a genuinely clarifying moment, with potentially enormous long-term implications.

The near-term political consequences with this will — or should — be that there’s now no chance whatsoever that Bernie Sanders can do anything more on his way out that could imperil party unity in a fashion that makes a Trump victory more likely. I don’t believe Sanders has any intention to accomplish this, by the way, but this would theoretically render it an impossibility in his mind, as it dramatically advances the stakes for a somewhat smooth resolution of the Democratic primaries. Indeed, I believe it is likely Sanders will dsicover it because of this, too.

To have all the details on Trump’s full energy plan, read Brad Plumer’s piece. Trump would pursue a mostly standard-issue GOP agenda of “fewer regulations and much more fossil fuel production.” More important, with some reporters wondering what Trump’s actual views are on global climate change, he clarified them: he could be utterly indifferent to its existence and would roll back the main things we’re currently putting in place to cope with it.

Trump claimed that the present environmental challenges that the national government is trying to tackle are “phony.” He added that he would “rescind” the EPA’s Clean Power Plan, which would curb skin tightening and emissions from existing coal-fired power plants, and is key towards the U.S.’s ability to meet its commitments included in the global climate deal. He would withdraw the U.S. from participation in that global accord.

As I have reported before, there are complexities that may make it harder than expected for a Republican president — even one as masterfully competent and strong as Trump — to roll back the Clean Power Plan and/or withdraw through the Paris climate deal. However it’s possible that Trump could accomplish one or these two, which will be a significant setback.

Connectivity for a smarter world
The world-wide-web of Things (IoT) has got the potential to resolve our biggest global challenges and bring people everywhere a significantly better total well being.
This deepens the contrast between Trump and Hillary Clinton. While Clinton would not be as ambitious as Sanders in tackling the climate challenge, the unalterable fact of the matter is the fact that Clinton would preserve and implement the Clean Power Plan as well as the global climate accord, and Trump would seek to reverse them both.

Resource

Politics

Trump tapped into a Reservoir of Inherent Racism

1 Comment

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump; former President Jimmy Carter. (Photos: Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post via Getty Images; John Bazemor/AP)Republican candidate this is certainly presidential Trump; former President Jimmy Carter.
Former President Jimmy Carter had some words which can be tough Monday for Donald Trump.

Carter told the most recent York Times that Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee that seems to be presidential had “tapped a waiting reservoir there of inherent racism.”

He also stated Trump had violated rights which are human many of his incendiary comments through the campaign trail. Ahead of the Times, Carter cited Trump’s proposal to bar Muslims via the U.S. regarding his declare that Mexico is criminals that are sending the U.S. border.

“When you pick out any particular group of people for secondary citizenship status, that’s a violation of basic individual rights,” the president that is former.

Carter, 91, offered the meeting into the Times to be able to emphasize a Baptist conference he could be hosting this autumn to handle race problems and inequality this is certainly social. The paper was told by him which he has seen a growth of available racism.

“I don’t feel great, aside from any a very important factor: i do think the planet continues to be reawakened days gone by a couple of years to your proven undeniable fact that we currently haven’t remedied the battle issue adequately,” he stated.

He further stated, “I think there’s a heavy effect among a several racially conscious Republicans against an African-American being president.”

Resource

Politics, Social Justice

Trumps supports sentenced for violence

1 Comment

Discrimination1Boston brothers accused in urinating on and beating a good homeless Mexican man and then telling police “Donald Trump was right: All these illegals need to be deported, ” were sentenced to prison on Monday, prosecutors said.

Scott Leader, 38, and then Steve Leader, 30, had recently pleaded guilty to indictments charging them with causing physical injury while committing a good civil rights violation, and also assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, among other charges.

Scott Leader was sentenced to three years in prison and Steve Leader was sentenced to 1-1/2 years, the Suffolk County Area Attorney’s Office said within a statement. The pair will also be on probation for three years after their prison sentences end.

The Commanders were arrested on Sept. 19 on suspicion concerning beating Rodriguez, 58 then, because he slept in a subway stop. The men told law enforcement many people targeted their victim general health thought he was an against the law immigrant.

The victim, Guillermo Rodriguez, said in a declaration that he was in fact a permanent resident.

“I came to this country many years ago and worked hard in the farm fields to provide produce to people here. I actually became a permanent resident of this country years ago, although if I had been undocumented I still would not have deserved to be beaten this way, ” Rodriguez said in a prepared statement read by Assistant District Attorney Nicole Rimar before the sentencing.

The pair punched and kicked Rodriguez, and one of the men repeatedly struck him with a metal pole, before the two walked off laughing, prosecutors said.

According to a police report, they told officers, “Donald Trump was right: All these illegals need to be deported. ”

Prosecutors said Scott Leader told arresting officers that he believed the attack was justified because the victim was homeless and Mexican. The pair allegedly threatened cops while in custody also.

Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for that U. S. presidential competition, has verbal on migrants, proposing to create a wall on the U. S. -Mexico promising and border, if elected, to deport the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the usa already.

Overcome, a genuine estate reality and developer tv personality, initially described that attack while an end result of passionate sights on migrants but later called that “terrible. ”

and then telling police “Donald Trump was right: All these illegals need to be deported, ” were sentenced to prison on Monday, prosecutors said.

Scott Leader, 38, and then Steve Leader, 30, had recently pleaded guilty to indictments charging them with causing physical injury while committing a good civil rights violation, and also assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, among other charges.

Scott Leader was sentenced to three years in prison and Steve Leader was sentenced to 1-1/2 years, the Suffolk County Area Attorney’s Office said within a statement. The pair will also be on probation for three years after their prison sentences end.

The Commanders were arrested on Sept. 19 on suspicion concerning beating Rodriguez, 58 then, because he slept in a subway stop. The men told law enforcement many people targeted their victim general health thought he was an against the law immigrant.

The victim, Guillermo Rodriguez, said in a declaration that he was in fact a permanent resident.

“I came to this country many years ago and worked hard in the farm fields to provide produce to people here. I actually became a permanent resident of this country years ago, although if I had been undocumented I still would not have deserved to be beaten this way, ” Rodriguez said in a prepared statement read by Assistant District Attorney Nicole Rimar before the sentencing.

The pair punched and kicked Rodriguez, and one of the men repeatedly struck him with a metal pole, before the two walked off laughing, prosecutors said.

According to a police report, they told officers, “Donald Trump was right: All these illegals need to be deported. ”

Prosecutors said Scott Leader told arresting officers that he believed the attack was justified because the victim was homeless and Mexican. The pair allegedly threatened cops while in custody also.

Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for that U. S. presidential competition, has verbal on migrants, proposing to create a wall on the U. S. -Mexico promising and border, if elected, to deport the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the USA already.

Overcome, a genuine estate reality and developer TV personality, initially described that attack while an end result of passionate sights on migrants but later called that “terrible. ”

Click on link for more information

Culture, Politics, Uncategorized

Bernie on fire for Native Americans

2 Comments

Bernie for Native AmericansBernie Sanders took his motorcade straight down a remote highway to go to the Pine Ridge Native American Reservation in rural Southwest Dakota, among the poorest of the United states where around 70% of students will opt out before graduating.

Thursday before addressing the packed gym, the Democratic presidential candidate met with leaders from tribes in the region privately. They draped him during a normal white-and-blue quilted umbrella and exchanged presents.

Her Sanders, the senator’s partner, had brought a pewter and cup tealight by Vermont, and by the ultimate end of the day, Sanders’ personnel was carrying moccasins, blanket and a bundle of sweetgrass handed to him while something special from someone inside crowd. From Minnesota to California, Sanders has met privately with Native American leaders from dozens of tribes in the past four months and spoken publicly, at each of his campaign stops, about the hardships their communities face.

His effort has not gone unnoticed, especially in the remaining primary states out West, where “Natives for Bernie” has become a visible and vocal part of the senator’s coalition.

Walter C. Fleming, head of the Department of Native American research at Montana Condition University in Bozeman, stated he was not amazed Sanders can be advocating for these kinds of problems on the trail. “Sanders can be picking up a significant amount of support more recently, owing too much to the visits that he’s making probably, out West particularly, ” said Fleming, who is one of the Kickapoo tribes in Kansas. “Jewish many people will always be thinking about causes of equal treatment and justice. ”

Sanders himself echoed the sentiment when asked about the origins of his interest in the issue.

“It comes from, I think, a political life of trying to do my best to protect the least amongst us, ” Sanders told ABC News after his visit to Pine Ridge. “I try to get an understanding of the reality of American life, and I’ve learned a whole lot in this advertising campaign. ”

‘At Least, We all Matter to Someone Away There.’

In Pine Shape, most of the audience people got Sanders’ T-shirts, signs and buttons, which include Theresa Claymore, 66, who have lived on the reservation and so said she hitchhiked to make sure you the function.

“He is the very best candidate , ” she explained. “ He is the only one who took time out of his busy schedule to visit us. ”

Claymore said she had watched him mention Native Americans during a TV interview. “At least we matter to somebody out there, ” she added.

By most estimates, Native native and Americans Alaskans comprise around 2 percent of the U. S. population, the area of the reason that demographic provides been overlooked during presidential campaigns often.

Seeking Beyond the Immediate Concerns

While both candidates have checked some key boxes for the constituency — talking about the need to improve health care and education on reservations and maintain tribal sovereignty — Sanders has been more vocal in his opposition to other key issues like the Keystone pipeline and fracking.

“ It is another block you can either ignore or cultivate, ” Professor Fleming added, saying again that the alliance made sense for the senator. “Particularly out West where some of these issues of land preservation and environment are not just Indian matters. ”

Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton is not without her support among Native Us citizens. Indeed, the elected president of the National Congress of American Indians, Brian Cladoosby, endorsed her together with a precise amount of tribal leaders in Washington Condition the primary.

Clinton’s husband, in particular, was popular in The Indian nation extremely. Leader Costs Clinton held a fabulous historical tribal summit on the Light Home with representatives by all federally known people and invited many people to take part in his initial inaugural parade.

In Mar, Hillary Clinton was presented with one’s Lushootseed name, “this? d? x?? i” this means “Strong Woman, ” during an ending up in 19 tribal leaders coming from around Washington state.

And then Councilman Bill Sterud from the Puyallup Tribe recalled the respect in participating in that inaugural parade.

“So in 2017, a little over a 12 months — when she is elected the next president, maybe, perhaps — we’ll get a call, ” he said during their conference.

Multiple Visits Seem to Make a Difference

But Clinton drew substantial criticism last month when the girl used a perceived bad collection to refer to now-presumptive GOP nominee Donald Overcome.

“I have a whole lot concerning experience coping with men who have sometimes log off the booking in the manner they behave, and they speak, ” she stated during an interview on CNN.

The campaign quickly granted an apology for the previous secretary of states’ provide feedback that lots of people found questionable.

Bruce Duthu, a tutor of Native American Research in Dartmouth University, predetermined that Clinton’s comment injure her standing in some Indigenous American circles and that Sanders has benefited from exclusive visits with so a large number of tribal communities.

Still, Duthu said many native people young and old remained skeptical of capturing campaign promises from any presidential runners. As the constituency neglected in recent administrations, many tribal leaders, he said, stay focused on sustaining basic tenets of their tribal sovereignty.

“ The general sense I receive is that indigenous peoples happen to be skeptical about either choice having the ability to deliver on the pledges they are producing to the Native American Indian country, ” he says.

One major problem of the challenge is the vacancy in one of the U. S. Supreme Courtroom, Duthu stated. “People for The Indian nation are acutely alert to the tremendous function the Supreme Courtroom offers in establishing the limitations of sovereign tribal expert, ” he added.

“Those boundaries have been drawn quite narrowly in recent years by a court dominated by conservative justices. There’s a lot riding on who gets the empty chair and, therefore, a lot riding on who gets to name the occupant of that chair. ”

Click and Read for further information

 

Ethics, Politics

Donald Trump’s swimsuit fetish

1 Comment

Donald trumps former girlfriend

One of Donald Trump’s former girlfriends says her comments were distorted in a New York Times piece alleging that the presumptive Republican nominee has a history of making “unwelcome advances” towards women.

“I did not have a negative experience with Donald Trump, ” Rowanne Brewer Lane told “Fox & Friends ” about Monday, two days following the element – titled “Crossing that Range: How Donald Overcome Behaved With Ladies in Personal ” – was posted. “And I don’t appreciate these people rendering it look like that. ”

For its 5, 000- term front-page story, the right times said, it interviewed a large number of women who had caused or for Trump “in the global worlds of property, pageants and modeling, ” including “ ladies who had dated your ex boyfriend or interacted with your ex boyfriend socially” and folks “who got closely observed his perform since his adolescence. ”

Brewer Lane was offered at the start of the article, which described her conference him at an ongoing party at his Palm Beach, Fla., estate:
Donald was in fact having a pool party in Mar-a-Lago. There have been about 60 models and 30 males. There were women in the private pools, splashing around. For reasons uknown Donald seemed just a little smitten with me. He just started talking to me and nobody else. He suddenly took me by the hand, and he started to show me around the mansion. He asked me if I had a swimsuit with me. I said no . I hadn’t intended to swim. He took me into a room and opened drawers and asked me to put on a swimsuit.

“I went into the bathroom and tried one on, ” Brewer Lane continued. “I came out, and he said, ‘Wow. ’”

Trump, “then 44 and in the midst of his first divorce, decided to show her off to the crowd at Mar-a-Lago, ” based on the right times.

“He brought me personally out to that pool and stated, ‘That is a sensational Trump young lady, isn’t it? ’” Coffee maker Lane recounted to the changing times.
But Brewer Lane stated that she was flattered through gesture.

“It wasn’t weird, it was polite actually, on Mon ” Brewer Lane told Yahoo Information. “I assumed he had been, you know, thoughtful. ”

“I’m actually astonished what size a deal is being crafted from it, ” she further. “It wasn’t a big deal. ”

Within an interview with “Fox & Friends” previous Wednesday, Brewer Lane said that she felt demeaned at all “never. ”

“He is extremely gracious, ” the lady said. “I noticed your ex boyfriend around all sorts of people, all sorts of women. He was extremely sweet, thoughtful, generous. He was your gentleman. ”

Relating to make sure you Brewer Lane, the changing times certain her “that it could certainly not be a strike piece and this my tale would encounter in the manner I was informing that and accurately. It was not absolutely. ”

“I made it clear often that I had an extremely pleasurable romantic relationship with Donald, ” she told CNN during another interview. “I under no circumstances felt like I had been represented as a piece of meat. ”

Brewer Lane, who advised CNN she’s not spoken to Trump since 1991, said also said she was compelled to come forward by Trump or the campaign.

“I wanted to set the record straight, ” she told Yahoo News. “Neither one of us did anything wrong. We didn’t do the improper reporting. ”

On Sunday, Trump slammed the story as a “lame hit piece. ” Following Brewer Lane’s Monday “Fox & Friends” appearance, Trump offered her story as proof that the Times “lied. ”

Click here to read more

Culture, Politics, Social Justice

Transgenders fight over bathroom rights

1 Comment

transgender-1The recent introduction of laws that regulate whether transgender people can use the facilities that align with their gender identities has brought the issue of bathroom sex segregation to the forefront of national conversations. Some have proposed that the solution may lie in gender-neutral facilities, while others worry in what the consequences may be. But , whilst attempts to prohibit gender intermingling in restrooms took on a new concentrate, the roots of the debate day back over a century.

Although first sex-segregated toilets had been established in Paris in the 1700s, regulations requiring that American men and women use individual restrooms got their begin in the late 1800s. The first regulation requiring distinct toilet facilities for men and women was passed in 1887, when Massachusetts needed the establishment of distinct privies in businesses. “Wherever male and female persons are employed in the same factory or workshop, a significant number of separate and distinct water-closets, earth-closets, or privies shall be provided for the use of each sex and should be plainly designated, ” the law reads. In the next line, mixed use of such facilities is prohibited. Over the course of the next three decades, nearly every state passed its own version of that law.

But the rules that govern who pees where in public spaces were not created due to physical differences among women and men that affect just how bathrooms are used. “You can think that it makes sense, that bathrooms are separated by sex because there are fundamental biological variations, ” says Terry Kogan, a statutory regulation professor at the University of Utah. “That’s completely wrong. ”

Kogan, who did extensive research on days gone by history of sex-segregation in public areas restrooms, tells TIME that the guidelines came into being as a total consequence of social anxieties about women’s locations in the world.

Social norms of the time dictated that the true residential was a woman’s place. As women entered the place of work even, often in the brand new factories which were being built at the time, there was a reluctance to integrate them fully into public life. Women, policymakers argued, were inherently weaker and still in need of protection from the harsh realities of the public sphere. Thus, separate facilities were introduced in nearly every aspect of society: women’s reading rooms were incorporated into public libraries; separate train cars were established for women, keeping them in the back to protect them in the event of a crash; and, with the introduction of indoor bathrooms which were along the way of replacing single-person outhouses after that, separate loos followed soon. The recommended layouts of bathrooms, says Kogan, were made to mimic the comforts of home-think chaise and curtains lounges.

“[Ladies’ rooms] had been used to create this shielded haven in this dangerous general public realm, ” says Kogan.

Today, despite the fact that society’s views on ladies have shifted largely, sex-segregated bathrooms remain the custom.

Why? Because major plumbing codes in the U. S. use a public building’s capacity to dictate how many restrooms should be built, and those codes specify that men and women’s facilities should be separate. The codes even mandate a minimum number of toilets and urinals per sex. Often , those formulas result in more facilities being made available for men than for females, despite famously lengthy lines for ladies’ rooms.

There were efforts to chip apart at the inequity facing the sexes in bathrooms-in 1987 California signed the Bathroom Equity Act, which stated fresh public projects had a need to include even more restrooms for females. Equivalent ordinances were used in metropolitan areas across the U. S., however in many places there exists a reluctance to neutralize bathrooms with regards to gender still.

As the debate over bathrooms offers shifted, a few of the arguments policymakers are using to guard the circumstances ring might ring familiar to those familiar with bathrooms’ history: the idea that separate facilities will protect women from harm remains. Two North Carolina lawmakers have said that eliminating separate bathrooms would “deny women their right to basic safety and privacy. ” Research does show that trans people may be at risk in bathroom situations-a 2013 survey by the Williams Institute found that 70% of trans people reported experiencing denial of access, verbal harassment or physical assault in an attempt to use the bathroom-but Kogan says the idea that all women are in increased danger in mixed or gender-neutral bathrooms doesn’t make sense, as predators “ aren’t waiting for permission to decorate like a woman to get into bathrooms. ”

For for information click on link

Politics

Do you believe that a single-payer health Care would probably still be expensive?

1 Comment

Bernie Sanders’s chances at enacting a “political revolution” represent but gone. But this doesn’t mean his policy agenda won’t remain to be felt within this election or future Democratic platforms.
One among his signature proposals is usually to move the country’s medical treatment system to a government-run, single payer system. A while back, Hillary Clinton nodded for the reason that direction, suggesting that she will be open to allowing Americans older than 50 to purchase into the government Medicare program that presently covers those 65 senior.
However, also a week ago, a detailed analysis of the Sanders health insurance plan from researchers at the Urban Institute showed that it will probably cost government doubles exactly what the campaign proposed. It is the second credible analysis to suggest the fact that the Sanders plan is more expensive than advertised. (The additional comes from the Emory health policy professor Kenneth Thorpe.)
The Sanders plan is light on some key details, but even in sketch form, it appears clear that it would require even bigger tax increases than the sizable ones the campaign has required.
If you do in fact go searching life, plenty of countries have single-payer systems. As well as all of them pay substantially less for health care than we do within the united states. I am reminded of the often, within the comments of an of my articles. How could a single-payer system here still be so expensive?

One reason would certainly Sanders plan covers excess of typical insurance plans within the United States — or abroad. The Sanders plan would charge no premiums, require no out-of-pocket spending and shall pay the bill for services like dental care and long-term nursing home stays. That which boost the total price tag.
However, imagine a universe where we managed to have a single-payer health plan that has been closer to normal insurance. Perhaps it would be a true “Medicare for all,” where all people have the same insurance the fact that the national currently provides to older people and the disabled.
That Medicare-for-all plan would still are more expensive than single-payer plans in other countries. Here’s why: Medicare rewards doctors and hospitals higher prices than single-payer systems do in other nations.
“The popular trend is that providers here make a great deal of more money than they do anywhere else, and in order in order to get in the ballpark of where these other countries are, you’d reduce payment rates to physicians too much, a lot lower levels,” said John Holahan, possibly one of the authors of a given Urban analysis. “That is just hard to practice.”
The Corporation for Economic Cooperation and Development, which looks for a category of free countries, has discovered that this America pays substantially higher prices for doctors, hospital stays and prescribed drugs in comparison to the whole group. Medicare pays under the USA average, although not enough less to make-up that difference.
Producing the American health care system noticeably cheaper would mean not just cutting the insurance companies away from the game and lowering the high administrative costs of the American system. It will also require paying doctors and nurses substantially lower salaries, using fewer new and high-tech treatments, and doubtless eliminate some of the perks of American hospital stays, like private patient rooms.
The typical family physician north america earns $207,000, in accordance with the Medscape Physician Compensation Report. General practitioners in Britain, which has a single-payer system, earn $81,000 to $122,000. The gaps in spend for specialists are a great deal larger.
The Urban Institute report presumesthat this Sanders plan would pay the bill for doctors substantially, though not by half. That is an acceptable assumption.

Plus we pay a bit more for drugs in comparison to the whole world, though many experts suppose that a single-payer health plan could push down drug prices because drug companies earn such high profit. The Urban analysis assumes that the country could quickly get to prices 25 % lower than what Medicare pays. (That shift assumes a political revolution, of course, because the pharmaceutical companies are a remarkably effective lobby.)
The Sanders campaign disputes many of the Urban Institute’s assumptions. The Sanders team thinks, for instance, that drug prices could well be pushed even lower. Therefore argues that the scientists overestimated the costs connected with administering the govt program. However, it does not debate that the prices paid to medical providers could be cut more sharply.
The very same problem exists for other attempts to reduce health spending in the United States. Efforts through Obama administration to pay doctors and hospitals differently are made to squeegee some waste from the system, by eliminating special care that may not help people’s health. However it has performed little to remove and replace the prices earn money for health care bills. That means that its best hope is usually to “bend the cost curve,” or lessen the rate that health spending grows.
Republican proposals to help make medical treatment into more of free of charge market also tend to assume that they will slow spending growth, not really reduce it.
The Sanders plan would require a huge reorganization of this very country’s health treatment system. Overnight, it would include the private insurance industry out of business, in association with lots of other companies that support it. It will shift vast amounts of dollars of spending from individuals, workers, and states into the federal budget. Doing that might well reduce some of the country’s medical treatment spending that is going toward insurer profits and paper-pushing.

However, more than 90 % of the dollars we currently pay for medical treatment go toward health treatment. Moreover, making big cuts all at once to doctors and hospitals could cause substantial disruptions in care. Some hospitals could go bust. Some doctors would default on their mortgages and student loans. Even when the United States decided that medicine should make you a more middle-class profession — not an understandable outcome, with the substantial public support for the medical professions — it may be difficult to accomplish the change directly.
All of that signifies that bringing a government-run, single-payer medical treatment system could achieve the majority of the goals of the advocates: more equity, lower complexity and some reductions in cost. The United States would continue to possess the most high priced medical treatment system on earth. Moreover, we’d raise taxes high enough to cover it.

Author Resource Box:
Click and read for further information

Politics

Should Trump apologized for insulting veterans?

Leave a comment

In response to this article: The men and women in this country deserve honor for being brave enough to die for the United States. I give them praise for their dedication because they put their lives on the line daily. My question is why would Mr. Trump do such an act since he has not been to war? Family have lost love one’s that they will never see again. If they could many of these families would love to have their love ones home, but instead many are resting in their grave because they paid the ultimate price and that is they gave their life.

Featured Image -- 1043

Senator John McCain of Arizona called on Donald J. Trump to make amends to veterans for his belittling comments about prisoners of war and suggested he would be unlikely to appear on a stage with Mr. Trump until that happened.

Mr. McCain has committed to supporting Mr. Trump as the Republican nominee for president. But in an interview that aired on CNN’s “ State of the Union” on Sunday, Mr. McCain expressed deep dismay at the tenor of the Republican presidential race, saying Mr. Trump make amends to “a body of American heroes” he had offended.

Mr. Trump mocked Mr. McCain last summer for having been imprisoned and captured during the Vietnam War, stating that he preferred “people who weren’t captured. ”

Mr. McCain, who was simply the Republican presidential nominee in 2008, informed CNN that this individual was indifferent to Mr personally. Trump’s ridicule but that he cannot abide the affront to veterans generally. Asked if he’d show up on the marketing campaign path with Mr. Trump, Mr. McCain said “ lots of things would need to happen” first.

“ I believe it’s very important to Donald Trump expressing his – not Steve McCain, but veterans who have been incarcerated as prisoners of battle, ” Mr. McCain said. “When he said, ‘I don’t like people who were captured, ’ then there’s a body of American heroes that I’d like to see him retract that statement – not about me, but about the others. ”

Mr. McCain’s comments add to the already extraordinary pressure on Mr. Trump to mend his relationships across the Republican Party and win over a range of party leaders he has alienated in the 2016 campaign. One of Mr. McCain’s closest friends in the Senate, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, has already announced that he will not vote for Mr. Trump under any circumstances.

Mr. McCain said it was incumbent on Mr. Trump to “heal many of the wounds” from the primary season. The senator said the “personalization” of the 2016 race was like nothing he had ever seen, “where people’s integrity and character are questioned. ”

Noting the rift that had opened in the Republican Party, Mr. McCain said the party’s leaders  lost touch of numerous voters in Mr. Trump’s constituency – mainly, he said, old, white, blue-collar employees who see no working job prospects.

“ There is certainly some distance, if not really a disconnect, between party leadership and members of Congress, ” Mr. McCain said, “and lots of the voters who’ve chosen Donald Trump to be the nominee of the ongoing party. ”

Reference

Politics

Will the prominent Republicans support Trump in the general election?

1 Comment

Featured Image -- 1043

In response: I know that Trump is winning, but I have many questions.How much does he know about the global affairs? What is his experience in politics?  What is his plan, he keeps on saying “Let’s make America Great, again” and how will he achieve this? I noticed he makes all these promises. What happens when he does not keep his promise and the country finds out that the emperor does not have no cloths on? I disagree with his politics, but I agree that all have the right to run for the highest office in the country. Politics is not a joke, it not a fashion show, it is the lives of millions of people. I want someone who will represent all people and not just a few angry people.Stirring anger only makes the country look like we are a country of thugs in the media, not a country that is a leader in the world. Think about it and think hard. In stead of a leader taking us into the future, we might be headed into the twilight zone.

Donald Trump’s march to the White House experienced fierce level of resistance from his own party Thursday as senior lawmakers hesitated to promote him, party luminaries said they’d skip his nominating convention and others considered the possibility of a third-party bid.

House Speaker Paul Ryan said he’s ” not ready” to aid Trump, becoming the best elected Republican official to improve concerns about Trump since he became the party’s likely standard-bearer this week.
Within an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Ryan said he wants Trump to unify “all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement” and run a campaign that may allow Americans to “have a thing that they’re proud to aid and proud to become a part of. ”
“And we have methods to go from here to there, ” Ryan said.
Trump dug in. Hours after Ryan’s announcement, Trump proclaimed in a statement that “I am not prepared to support Speaker Ryan’s agenda. ” He added, “Perhaps later on we can interact and come to an agreement in what is best for the American people. They have already been treated so badly for such a long time that it’s time for politicians to place them first! ”
Trump continued to highlight Ryan’s reports on Friday morning.
“So many great endorsements yesterday, aside from Paul Ryan! We should put America and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN first! ” Trump tweeted.

On morning Friday, Trump confirmed he designed to meet with Ryan next week, but wasn’t sure what they’d talk about.
“I have absolutely no idea, ” Trump told Fox News’ “Fox Friends” about the conversation topics. ” There are a lot of days before that. ”
The developments reflect the growing split in the GOP in the days since Trump’s commanding victory in the Indiana primary, which forced his remaining Republican rivals out of the race. The resistance underscored how far he has to go to unite the party before the November general election.
CNN reached out to 16 Republican elected officials, leaders and major fundraisers associated with former Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush and former Vice President Dick Cheney. Speaking on background, none of them said they were planning to go to this summer’s Republican convention. They didn’t say they would vote for Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. But they said they were not yet supporting Trump.
2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney declared he’d skip the convention, joining at least three prior Republican nominees — John McCain and both Presidents Bush — in declining to attend the event.
Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake told CNN’s Manu Raju that ” some of Trump’s positions” make it ” very difficult for me ” to aid him.
Meanwhile, Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse continued an extended Facebook diatribe against Trump and conservative blogger Erick Erickson said some members of Congress have joined his effort to recruit a third-party candidate.
Regardless of the day’s tumult, Trump gained some allies, including former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, his one-time rival in the 2016 race.
“He is not really a perfect man. But what I really do believe is that he loves this national country and he’ll surround himself with capable, experienced people and he’ll pay attention to them, ” Perry told CNN’s Dana Bash.
Bill Cole, a Republican candidate for governor in West Virginia, appeared onstage at a Trump event there Thursday and embraced the true estate mogul’s method of politics, drawing a comparison even.
“You go through the things that I really believe Donald Trump’s brings, and I’m that business guy, too. I’m one that will go in and make those tough decisions, ” Cole said.
Jokes fly about Trump’s potential vice president 02: 03
Taking center stage in the entire days ahead could be the divide between Trump and Ryan. The speaker’s move may help his party’s members deflect questions about Trump — but it additionally, means discord will continue before an over-all election where control of the Senate, several governorships and blue-state House seats are also at risk.
The gulf between Ryan and Trump now means Ryan, who as House speaker will chair the Republican National Convention, is months away from coronating a nominee he — so far — doesn’t officially support.
The first effort at détente between Trump and Ryan, Republican National Committee spokesman Sean Spicer told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on Thursday evening, could come the next week. The RNC is attempting to set up a meeting between Trump and Ryan. The speaker’s spokesman tweeted that he’d be ” happy to attend. ”
Among the problems: The two aren’t on the same page in terms of policy.
On free trade, taxes, immigration, the minimum wage and more, Trump has broken from conservative orthodoxy — a problem for Capitol Hill Republicans who have prized purity in recent years.
Ryan laid out what he wants to see from Trump in his interview with Tapper.
“Saying we’re unified doesn’t in and of itself unify us, but taking the principles that we all believe in actually, showing that there surely is a dedication to those, and owning a principled campaign that Republicans could be proud about and that may actually appeal to most Americans — that, if you ask me, is what must be done to unify this ongoing party, ” the speaker said.
What 2012’s electoral map shows us about 2016 03: 30
Ryan’s comments about Trump quickly became a political football, with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign highlighting the speaker within a “growing set of conservatives rebuking Trump” within an email.
A Republican strategist involved with Senate races told CNN that he’s worried Ryan has create a situation which will be problematic for him to eventually escape.
” What exactly are the conditions where Ryan will ever endorse? I have no idea how this ends, ” the strategist said. “What would make him reach a yes on Trump? I’m uncertain what Trump can do, apart from change his positions. ”
The speaker’s move may help House Republicans — particularly those facing competitive general election races — giving them cover to break from Trump, or delay a stance on whether they’ll support him in November.
But many Senate Republicans, including Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, and endangered members like New Hampshire’s Kelly Ayotte and Ohio’s Rob Portman, had already declared on Wednesday that they might keep their commitments to support the party’s nominee by backing Trump.
Eric Trump talks about his father’s Cinco de Mayo tweet 01: 22
Looming over it all is the prospect of a third-party campaign by a conservative intent on hewing closer to traditional Republican principles than Trump.
Erickson, the conservative blogger, told CNN — without naming them — that members of Congress have joined influential Republican members of the Trump movement in seeking out a candidate.
“Planning is continuing for a third-party, ” he said. “I don’t necessarily read this as Ryan endorsing a third party, but it gives motivation to people who want a third party to continue down that track. I have had several congressmen reach out to me to encourage a third party because they are worried about turnout in (November) because they want an alternative to Trump. ”
The candidate many conservatives view as ideal is Sasse, the freshman Nebraska senator. He has rejected overtures far thus, pointing to his young family and saying like-minded Republicans have to look for a candidate who can devote enough time essential to campaigning.
However in a Facebook screed in the first Thursday early morning, Sasse wrote: “Why shouldn’t America draft a genuine leader who’ll concentrate on 70% solutions for another four years? You understand… a grown-up? ”

Reference

http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/05/politics/paul-ryan-donald-trump-republican-resistance/